Measuring Annual Sedimentation through High Accuracy UAV-Photogrammetry Data and Comparison with RUSLE and PESERA Erosion Models

Model-based soil erosion studies have increased in number, given the availability of geodata and the recent technological advances. However, their accuracy remains rather questionable since the scarcity of field records hinders the validation of simulated values. In this context, this study aims to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simoni Alexiou, Nikolaos Efthimiou, Mina Karamesouti, Ioannis Papanikolaou, Emmanouil Psomiadis, Nikos Charizopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/5/1339
_version_ 1797614434782281728
author Simoni Alexiou
Nikolaos Efthimiou
Mina Karamesouti
Ioannis Papanikolaou
Emmanouil Psomiadis
Nikos Charizopoulos
author_facet Simoni Alexiou
Nikolaos Efthimiou
Mina Karamesouti
Ioannis Papanikolaou
Emmanouil Psomiadis
Nikos Charizopoulos
author_sort Simoni Alexiou
collection DOAJ
description Model-based soil erosion studies have increased in number, given the availability of geodata and the recent technological advances. However, their accuracy remains rather questionable since the scarcity of field records hinders the validation of simulated values. In this context, this study aims to present a method for measuring sediment deposition at a typical Mediterranean catchment (870 ha) in Greece through high spatial resolution field measurements acquired by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) survey. Three-dimensional modeling is considered to be an emerging technique for surface change detection. The UAV-derived point cloud comparison, applying the Structure-from-Motion (SfM) technique at the Platana sediment retention dam test site, quantified annual topsoil change in cm-scale accuracy (0.02–0.03 m), delivering mean sediment yield of 1620 m<sup>3</sup> ± 180 m<sup>3</sup> or 6.05 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup> and 3500 m<sup>3</sup> ± 194 m<sup>3</sup> or 13 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup> for the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 estimation. Moreover, the widely applied PESERA and RUSLE models estimated the 2020–2021 mean sediment yield at 1.12 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup> and 3.51 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, while an increase was evident during the 2021–2022 simulation (2.49 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup> and 3.56 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). Both applications appear to underestimate the net soil loss rate, with RUSLE being closer to the measured results. The difference is mostly attributed to the model’s limitation to simulate gully erosion or to a C-factor misinterpretation. To the authors’ better knowledge, this study is among the few UAV applications employed to acquire high-accuracy soil loss measurements. The results proved extremely useful in our attempt to measure sediment yield at the cm scale through UAV-SfM and decipher the regional soil erosion and sediment transport pattern, also offering a direct assessment of the retention dams’ life expectancy.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:12:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4dd35bd5f103443e992fc49c14eab6bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:12:14Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-4dd35bd5f103443e992fc49c14eab6bb2023-11-17T08:31:43ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-02-01155133910.3390/rs15051339Measuring Annual Sedimentation through High Accuracy UAV-Photogrammetry Data and Comparison with RUSLE and PESERA Erosion ModelsSimoni Alexiou0Nikolaos Efthimiou1Mina Karamesouti2Ioannis Papanikolaou3Emmanouil Psomiadis4Nikos Charizopoulos5Laboratory of Mineralogy and Geology, Department of Natural Resources & Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, GreeceFaculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech RepublicGeoinformation Science Lab, Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyLaboratory of Mineralogy and Geology, Department of Natural Resources & Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, GreeceLaboratory of Mineralogy and Geology, Department of Natural Resources & Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, GreeceLaboratory of Mineralogy and Geology, Department of Natural Resources & Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, GreeceModel-based soil erosion studies have increased in number, given the availability of geodata and the recent technological advances. However, their accuracy remains rather questionable since the scarcity of field records hinders the validation of simulated values. In this context, this study aims to present a method for measuring sediment deposition at a typical Mediterranean catchment (870 ha) in Greece through high spatial resolution field measurements acquired by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) survey. Three-dimensional modeling is considered to be an emerging technique for surface change detection. The UAV-derived point cloud comparison, applying the Structure-from-Motion (SfM) technique at the Platana sediment retention dam test site, quantified annual topsoil change in cm-scale accuracy (0.02–0.03 m), delivering mean sediment yield of 1620 m<sup>3</sup> ± 180 m<sup>3</sup> or 6.05 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup> and 3500 m<sup>3</sup> ± 194 m<sup>3</sup> or 13 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup> for the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 estimation. Moreover, the widely applied PESERA and RUSLE models estimated the 2020–2021 mean sediment yield at 1.12 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup> and 3.51 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, while an increase was evident during the 2021–2022 simulation (2.49 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup> and 3.56 t ha<sup>−1</sup>yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). Both applications appear to underestimate the net soil loss rate, with RUSLE being closer to the measured results. The difference is mostly attributed to the model’s limitation to simulate gully erosion or to a C-factor misinterpretation. To the authors’ better knowledge, this study is among the few UAV applications employed to acquire high-accuracy soil loss measurements. The results proved extremely useful in our attempt to measure sediment yield at the cm scale through UAV-SfM and decipher the regional soil erosion and sediment transport pattern, also offering a direct assessment of the retention dams’ life expectancy.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/5/1339soil erosionRUSLEPESERAUAVpoint cloudStructure-from-Motion
spellingShingle Simoni Alexiou
Nikolaos Efthimiou
Mina Karamesouti
Ioannis Papanikolaou
Emmanouil Psomiadis
Nikos Charizopoulos
Measuring Annual Sedimentation through High Accuracy UAV-Photogrammetry Data and Comparison with RUSLE and PESERA Erosion Models
Remote Sensing
soil erosion
RUSLE
PESERA
UAV
point cloud
Structure-from-Motion
title Measuring Annual Sedimentation through High Accuracy UAV-Photogrammetry Data and Comparison with RUSLE and PESERA Erosion Models
title_full Measuring Annual Sedimentation through High Accuracy UAV-Photogrammetry Data and Comparison with RUSLE and PESERA Erosion Models
title_fullStr Measuring Annual Sedimentation through High Accuracy UAV-Photogrammetry Data and Comparison with RUSLE and PESERA Erosion Models
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Annual Sedimentation through High Accuracy UAV-Photogrammetry Data and Comparison with RUSLE and PESERA Erosion Models
title_short Measuring Annual Sedimentation through High Accuracy UAV-Photogrammetry Data and Comparison with RUSLE and PESERA Erosion Models
title_sort measuring annual sedimentation through high accuracy uav photogrammetry data and comparison with rusle and pesera erosion models
topic soil erosion
RUSLE
PESERA
UAV
point cloud
Structure-from-Motion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/5/1339
work_keys_str_mv AT simonialexiou measuringannualsedimentationthroughhighaccuracyuavphotogrammetrydataandcomparisonwithrusleandpeseraerosionmodels
AT nikolaosefthimiou measuringannualsedimentationthroughhighaccuracyuavphotogrammetrydataandcomparisonwithrusleandpeseraerosionmodels
AT minakaramesouti measuringannualsedimentationthroughhighaccuracyuavphotogrammetrydataandcomparisonwithrusleandpeseraerosionmodels
AT ioannispapanikolaou measuringannualsedimentationthroughhighaccuracyuavphotogrammetrydataandcomparisonwithrusleandpeseraerosionmodels
AT emmanouilpsomiadis measuringannualsedimentationthroughhighaccuracyuavphotogrammetrydataandcomparisonwithrusleandpeseraerosionmodels
AT nikoscharizopoulos measuringannualsedimentationthroughhighaccuracyuavphotogrammetrydataandcomparisonwithrusleandpeseraerosionmodels