Representation of published core outcome sets for research in regulatory guidance: protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Background: The COMET Initiative promotes the development and use of ‘core outcome sets’ (COS), agreed standardised sets of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all studies in a particular clinical condition. COS are determined by consensus amongst key stakeholders, including health prof...
Main Authors: | Susanna Dodd, Rebecca Fish, Sarah Gorst, Deborah Hall, Pamela Jacobsen, Jamie Kirkham, Barry Main, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Ian J. Saldanha, Dominic Trépel, Paula R. Williamson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2021-06-01
|
Series: | HRB Open Research |
Online Access: | https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/4-45/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Representation of published core outcome sets for research in regulatory guidance: protocol [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Susanna Dodd, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Using behavioural science to enhance use of core outcome sets in trials: protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Molly Byrne, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Use of core outcome sets was low in clinical trials published in major medical journals
by: Matvienko-Sikar, K, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
by: Elizabeth Gargon, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Jamie Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)