Task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviors

Social animals have the remarkable ability to organize into collectives to achieve goals unobtainable to individual members. Equally striking is the observation that despite differences in perceptual-motor capabilities, different animals often exhibit qualitatively similar collective states of organ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Nalepka, Paula L. Silva, Rachel W. Kallen, Kevin Shockley, Anthony Chemero, Elliot Saltzman, Michael J. Richardson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592491/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1818435623226179584
author Patrick Nalepka
Paula L. Silva
Rachel W. Kallen
Kevin Shockley
Anthony Chemero
Elliot Saltzman
Michael J. Richardson
author_facet Patrick Nalepka
Paula L. Silva
Rachel W. Kallen
Kevin Shockley
Anthony Chemero
Elliot Saltzman
Michael J. Richardson
author_sort Patrick Nalepka
collection DOAJ
description Social animals have the remarkable ability to organize into collectives to achieve goals unobtainable to individual members. Equally striking is the observation that despite differences in perceptual-motor capabilities, different animals often exhibit qualitatively similar collective states of organization and coordination. Such qualitative similarities can be seen in corralling behaviors involving the encirclement of prey that are observed, for example, during collaborative hunting amongst several apex predator species living in disparate environments. Similar encirclement behaviors are also displayed by human participants in a collaborative problem-solving task involving the herding and containment of evasive artificial agents. Inspired by the functional similarities in this behavior across humans and non-human systems, this paper investigated whether the containment strategies displayed by humans emerge as a function of the task’s underlying dynamics, which shape patterns of goal-directed corralling more generally. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the strategies naïve human dyads adopt during the containment of a set of evasive artificial agents across two disparate task contexts. Despite the different movement types (manual manipulation or locomotion) required in the different task contexts, the behaviors that humans display can be predicted as emergent properties of the same underlying task-dynamic model.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T16:55:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4dddbaa3b099480b925908bbbbfd6e65
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T16:55:49Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-4dddbaa3b099480b925908bbbbfd6e652022-12-21T22:53:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-011611Task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviorsPatrick NalepkaPaula L. SilvaRachel W. KallenKevin ShockleyAnthony ChemeroElliot SaltzmanMichael J. RichardsonSocial animals have the remarkable ability to organize into collectives to achieve goals unobtainable to individual members. Equally striking is the observation that despite differences in perceptual-motor capabilities, different animals often exhibit qualitatively similar collective states of organization and coordination. Such qualitative similarities can be seen in corralling behaviors involving the encirclement of prey that are observed, for example, during collaborative hunting amongst several apex predator species living in disparate environments. Similar encirclement behaviors are also displayed by human participants in a collaborative problem-solving task involving the herding and containment of evasive artificial agents. Inspired by the functional similarities in this behavior across humans and non-human systems, this paper investigated whether the containment strategies displayed by humans emerge as a function of the task’s underlying dynamics, which shape patterns of goal-directed corralling more generally. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the strategies naïve human dyads adopt during the containment of a set of evasive artificial agents across two disparate task contexts. Despite the different movement types (manual manipulation or locomotion) required in the different task contexts, the behaviors that humans display can be predicted as emergent properties of the same underlying task-dynamic model.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592491/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Patrick Nalepka
Paula L. Silva
Rachel W. Kallen
Kevin Shockley
Anthony Chemero
Elliot Saltzman
Michael J. Richardson
Task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviors
PLoS ONE
title Task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviors
title_full Task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviors
title_fullStr Task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviors
title_full_unstemmed Task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviors
title_short Task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviors
title_sort task dynamics define the contextual emergence of human corralling behaviors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592491/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT patricknalepka taskdynamicsdefinethecontextualemergenceofhumancorrallingbehaviors
AT paulalsilva taskdynamicsdefinethecontextualemergenceofhumancorrallingbehaviors
AT rachelwkallen taskdynamicsdefinethecontextualemergenceofhumancorrallingbehaviors
AT kevinshockley taskdynamicsdefinethecontextualemergenceofhumancorrallingbehaviors
AT anthonychemero taskdynamicsdefinethecontextualemergenceofhumancorrallingbehaviors
AT elliotsaltzman taskdynamicsdefinethecontextualemergenceofhumancorrallingbehaviors
AT michaeljrichardson taskdynamicsdefinethecontextualemergenceofhumancorrallingbehaviors