Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth

Background: Glass ionomer cement is a common material used in pediatric dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in deciduous teeth after conditioning with four different conditioners. Materials and Methods: Fifty intact primary...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Romina Mazaheri, Leila Pishevar, Ava Vali Shichani, Sanas Geravandi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=4;spage=337;epage=341;aulast=Mazaheri
_version_ 1798045907482050560
author Romina Mazaheri
Leila Pishevar
Ava Vali Shichani
Sanas Geravandi
author_facet Romina Mazaheri
Leila Pishevar
Ava Vali Shichani
Sanas Geravandi
author_sort Romina Mazaheri
collection DOAJ
description Background: Glass ionomer cement is a common material used in pediatric dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in deciduous teeth after conditioning with four different conditioners. Materials and Methods: Fifty intact primary canines were collected. Standard Class V cavities (2 mm × 1.5 mm × 3 mm) were prepared by one operator on all buccal tooth surfaces, including both enamel and dentin. The samples were divided into five groups with different conditioners (no conditioner, 20% acrylic acid, 35% phosphoric acid, 12% citric acid, and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]). Two-way - ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the means of microleakage between the five groups. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: There was no significant difference between the means of microleakage in incisal (enamel) and gingival (dentin) margins (P = 0.34). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the means of microleakage in enamel and dentin margins (P = 0.4). There was a significant difference between the means of microleakage in different groups (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it is suggested that 20% acrylic acid and 17% EDTA be used for cavity conditioning which can result in better chemical and micromechanical adhesion.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:28:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4dec5edceaae408d95bd3205aa5c0cf1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:28:51Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Dental Research Journal
spelling doaj.art-4dec5edceaae408d95bd3205aa5c0cf12022-12-22T03:57:13ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552015-01-0112433734110.4103/1735-3327.161448Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teethRomina MazaheriLeila PishevarAva Vali ShichaniSanas GeravandiBackground: Glass ionomer cement is a common material used in pediatric dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in deciduous teeth after conditioning with four different conditioners. Materials and Methods: Fifty intact primary canines were collected. Standard Class V cavities (2 mm × 1.5 mm × 3 mm) were prepared by one operator on all buccal tooth surfaces, including both enamel and dentin. The samples were divided into five groups with different conditioners (no conditioner, 20% acrylic acid, 35% phosphoric acid, 12% citric acid, and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]). Two-way - ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the means of microleakage between the five groups. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: There was no significant difference between the means of microleakage in incisal (enamel) and gingival (dentin) margins (P = 0.34). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the means of microleakage in enamel and dentin margins (P = 0.4). There was a significant difference between the means of microleakage in different groups (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it is suggested that 20% acrylic acid and 17% EDTA be used for cavity conditioning which can result in better chemical and micromechanical adhesion.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=4;spage=337;epage=341;aulast=MazaheriCervical restorationdental leakageglass ionomer cementprimary tooth
spellingShingle Romina Mazaheri
Leila Pishevar
Ava Vali Shichani
Sanas Geravandi
Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth
Dental Research Journal
Cervical restoration
dental leakage
glass ionomer cement
primary tooth
title Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth
title_full Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth
title_fullStr Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth
title_short Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth
title_sort effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth
topic Cervical restoration
dental leakage
glass ionomer cement
primary tooth
url http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=4;spage=337;epage=341;aulast=Mazaheri
work_keys_str_mv AT rominamazaheri effectofdifferentcavityconditionersonmicroleakageofglassionomercementwithahighviscosityinprimaryteeth
AT leilapishevar effectofdifferentcavityconditionersonmicroleakageofglassionomercementwithahighviscosityinprimaryteeth
AT avavalishichani effectofdifferentcavityconditionersonmicroleakageofglassionomercementwithahighviscosityinprimaryteeth
AT sanasgeravandi effectofdifferentcavityconditionersonmicroleakageofglassionomercementwithahighviscosityinprimaryteeth