Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth
Background: Glass ionomer cement is a common material used in pediatric dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in deciduous teeth after conditioning with four different conditioners. Materials and Methods: Fifty intact primary...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Dental Research Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=4;spage=337;epage=341;aulast=Mazaheri |
_version_ | 1798045907482050560 |
---|---|
author | Romina Mazaheri Leila Pishevar Ava Vali Shichani Sanas Geravandi |
author_facet | Romina Mazaheri Leila Pishevar Ava Vali Shichani Sanas Geravandi |
author_sort | Romina Mazaheri |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Glass ionomer cement is a common material used in pediatric dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in deciduous teeth after conditioning with four different conditioners.
Materials and Methods: Fifty intact primary canines were collected. Standard Class V cavities (2 mm × 1.5 mm × 3 mm) were prepared by one operator on all buccal tooth surfaces, including both enamel and dentin. The samples were divided into five groups with different conditioners (no conditioner, 20% acrylic acid, 35% phosphoric acid, 12% citric acid, and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]). Two-way - ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the means of microleakage between the five groups. The significance level was set at P < 0.05.
Results: There was no significant difference between the means of microleakage in incisal (enamel) and gingival (dentin) margins (P = 0.34). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the means of microleakage in enamel and dentin margins (P = 0.4). There was a significant difference between the means of microleakage in different groups (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it is suggested that 20% acrylic acid and 17% EDTA be used for cavity conditioning which can result in better chemical and micromechanical adhesion. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T23:28:51Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4dec5edceaae408d95bd3205aa5c0cf1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1735-3327 2008-0255 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T23:28:51Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Dental Research Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-4dec5edceaae408d95bd3205aa5c0cf12022-12-22T03:57:13ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552015-01-0112433734110.4103/1735-3327.161448Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teethRomina MazaheriLeila PishevarAva Vali ShichaniSanas GeravandiBackground: Glass ionomer cement is a common material used in pediatric dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in deciduous teeth after conditioning with four different conditioners. Materials and Methods: Fifty intact primary canines were collected. Standard Class V cavities (2 mm × 1.5 mm × 3 mm) were prepared by one operator on all buccal tooth surfaces, including both enamel and dentin. The samples were divided into five groups with different conditioners (no conditioner, 20% acrylic acid, 35% phosphoric acid, 12% citric acid, and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]). Two-way - ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the means of microleakage between the five groups. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: There was no significant difference between the means of microleakage in incisal (enamel) and gingival (dentin) margins (P = 0.34). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the means of microleakage in enamel and dentin margins (P = 0.4). There was a significant difference between the means of microleakage in different groups (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it is suggested that 20% acrylic acid and 17% EDTA be used for cavity conditioning which can result in better chemical and micromechanical adhesion.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=4;spage=337;epage=341;aulast=MazaheriCervical restorationdental leakageglass ionomer cementprimary tooth |
spellingShingle | Romina Mazaheri Leila Pishevar Ava Vali Shichani Sanas Geravandi Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth Dental Research Journal Cervical restoration dental leakage glass ionomer cement primary tooth |
title | Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth |
title_full | Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth |
title_fullStr | Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth |
title_short | Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth |
title_sort | effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth |
topic | Cervical restoration dental leakage glass ionomer cement primary tooth |
url | http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2015;volume=12;issue=4;spage=337;epage=341;aulast=Mazaheri |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rominamazaheri effectofdifferentcavityconditionersonmicroleakageofglassionomercementwithahighviscosityinprimaryteeth AT leilapishevar effectofdifferentcavityconditionersonmicroleakageofglassionomercementwithahighviscosityinprimaryteeth AT avavalishichani effectofdifferentcavityconditionersonmicroleakageofglassionomercementwithahighviscosityinprimaryteeth AT sanasgeravandi effectofdifferentcavityconditionersonmicroleakageofglassionomercementwithahighviscosityinprimaryteeth |