Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?

In this contribution I make a comparative analysis of Het verhaal van Nederland (The story of the Netherlands) and Het verhaal van Vlaanderen (The story of Flanders) as historical productions, from the perspective of public history. I focus on three domains that are important to public historians....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pieter Van den Heede
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: openjournals.nl 2024-03-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/17757
_version_ 1797243572458618880
author Pieter Van den Heede
author_facet Pieter Van den Heede
author_sort Pieter Van den Heede
collection DOAJ
description In this contribution I make a comparative analysis of Het verhaal van Nederland (The story of the Netherlands) and Het verhaal van Vlaanderen (The story of Flanders) as historical productions, from the perspective of public history. I focus on three domains that are important to public historians. First, I will discuss the production contexts of both series, because they determine the framework wherein historians provide their expertise. I then analyse the maintained narrative techniques and how they shape the content, and whether or not these techniques distort the historical narrative. Finally, I make a plea for a study of the broader reception of these series, in order to mark the value of this type of research for public history.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:57:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4df9c67226774fdbaa43e9f0ad1add43
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:57:15Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher openjournals.nl
record_format Article
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
spelling doaj.art-4df9c67226774fdbaa43e9f0ad1add432024-03-26T15:03:18Zengopenjournals.nlBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982024-03-01139110.51769/bmgn-lchr.17757Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?Pieter Van den Heede0Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam In this contribution I make a comparative analysis of Het verhaal van Nederland (The story of the Netherlands) and Het verhaal van Vlaanderen (The story of Flanders) as historical productions, from the perspective of public history. I focus on three domains that are important to public historians. First, I will discuss the production contexts of both series, because they determine the framework wherein historians provide their expertise. I then analyse the maintained narrative techniques and how they shape the content, and whether or not these techniques distort the historical narrative. Finally, I make a plea for a study of the broader reception of these series, in order to mark the value of this type of research for public history. https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/17757Het Verhaal van NederlandHet Verhaal van VlaanderenPublieksgeschiedenis
spellingShingle Pieter Van den Heede
Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Het Verhaal van Nederland
Het Verhaal van Vlaanderen
Publieksgeschiedenis
title Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?
title_full Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?
title_fullStr Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?
title_full_unstemmed Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?
title_short Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?
title_sort historische televisie a la van oostrom en conscience
topic Het Verhaal van Nederland
Het Verhaal van Vlaanderen
Publieksgeschiedenis
url https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/17757
work_keys_str_mv AT pietervandenheede historischetelevisiealavanoostromenconscience