Northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change alone
Abstract Few long‐term, large‐scale studies have been conducted about the factors likely to explain changes in species abundance and distribution in winter. Range shifts are generally attributed to the climate change or land use. This study shows that other factors such as species protection and the...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2018-08-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4348 |
| _version_ | 1818853108127629312 |
|---|---|
| author | Loïc Marion Benjamin Bergerot |
| author_facet | Loïc Marion Benjamin Bergerot |
| author_sort | Loïc Marion |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Few long‐term, large‐scale studies have been conducted about the factors likely to explain changes in species abundance and distribution in winter. Range shifts are generally attributed to the climate change or land use. This study shows that other factors such as species protection and the ensuing increasing numbers of individuals and competition could be involved. It details the progressive conquest of France, the most important European wintering area for great cormorant, in three decades as its legal protection by the EU Birds Directive. It is based on 13 exhaustive national counts. Cormorants first occupied the farthest areas (Atlantic and Mediterranean lagoons, then larger rivers) from the main‐core European breeding area, with only progressive occupancy of the northeastern part later. This strategy mainly resulted from competition for optimal available feeding areas. Suboptimal areas (smaller wetlands harboring smaller night roosts, colder northeastern French areas) and progressive fragmentation of large night roosts into smaller, better located ones minimized flight costs. The coldest areas were occupied last, once other areas were saturated. Their occupancy was favored locally by the global climate change, but it played a minor role in these strategies. Both factors induced only a small NNE shift of the weighted centroid range of the wintering population (2.6 km/year) which mainly resulted from competition (buffer effect). Only the 2009 cold wave decreased the total number of wintering cormorants at the national scale, once the population had probably reached the carrying capacity of the country, while the previous cold waves had a minor effect. Comparatively, there was a greater SSE range shift of the weighted centroid of the breeding population (4.66 km/year). Range shifts of other recently protected species have been attributed to the sole climate change in the literature, but competition due to the saturation of usual wintering or breeding areas should be considered too. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T07:31:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4e04c873086742eb8c650efbeceb952a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2045-7758 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T07:31:34Z |
| publishDate | 2018-08-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Evolution |
| spelling | doaj.art-4e04c873086742eb8c650efbeceb952a2022-12-21T20:30:41ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582018-08-018168364837910.1002/ece3.4348Northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change aloneLoïc Marion0Benjamin Bergerot1UMR CNRS ECOBIO Université Rennes Rennes Cedex FranceUMR CNRS ECOBIO Université Rennes Rennes Cedex FranceAbstract Few long‐term, large‐scale studies have been conducted about the factors likely to explain changes in species abundance and distribution in winter. Range shifts are generally attributed to the climate change or land use. This study shows that other factors such as species protection and the ensuing increasing numbers of individuals and competition could be involved. It details the progressive conquest of France, the most important European wintering area for great cormorant, in three decades as its legal protection by the EU Birds Directive. It is based on 13 exhaustive national counts. Cormorants first occupied the farthest areas (Atlantic and Mediterranean lagoons, then larger rivers) from the main‐core European breeding area, with only progressive occupancy of the northeastern part later. This strategy mainly resulted from competition for optimal available feeding areas. Suboptimal areas (smaller wetlands harboring smaller night roosts, colder northeastern French areas) and progressive fragmentation of large night roosts into smaller, better located ones minimized flight costs. The coldest areas were occupied last, once other areas were saturated. Their occupancy was favored locally by the global climate change, but it played a minor role in these strategies. Both factors induced only a small NNE shift of the weighted centroid range of the wintering population (2.6 km/year) which mainly resulted from competition (buffer effect). Only the 2009 cold wave decreased the total number of wintering cormorants at the national scale, once the population had probably reached the carrying capacity of the country, while the previous cold waves had a minor effect. Comparatively, there was a greater SSE range shift of the weighted centroid of the breeding population (4.66 km/year). Range shifts of other recently protected species have been attributed to the sole climate change in the literature, but competition due to the saturation of usual wintering or breeding areas should be considered too.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4348behaviorcompetitionconservationcormorantpopulation trendsrange shift |
| spellingShingle | Loïc Marion Benjamin Bergerot Northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change alone Ecology and Evolution behavior competition conservation cormorant population trends range shift |
| title | Northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change alone |
| title_full | Northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change alone |
| title_fullStr | Northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change alone |
| title_full_unstemmed | Northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change alone |
| title_short | Northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change alone |
| title_sort | northern range shift may be due to increased competition induced by protection of species rather than to climate change alone |
| topic | behavior competition conservation cormorant population trends range shift |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4348 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT loicmarion northernrangeshiftmaybeduetoincreasedcompetitioninducedbyprotectionofspeciesratherthantoclimatechangealone AT benjaminbergerot northernrangeshiftmaybeduetoincreasedcompetitioninducedbyprotectionofspeciesratherthantoclimatechangealone |