Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic neck pain is a common complaint in the Netherlands with a point prevalence of 14.3%. Patients with chronic neck pain are often referred to a physiotherapist and, although many treatments are available, it remains unclear whic...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2004-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/5/34 |
_version_ | 1818010337810579456 |
---|---|
author | Vos Cees J Geilen Mario Verhagen Arianne P Vonk Frieke Koes Bart W |
author_facet | Vos Cees J Geilen Mario Verhagen Arianne P Vonk Frieke Koes Bart W |
author_sort | Vos Cees J |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic neck pain is a common complaint in the Netherlands with a point prevalence of 14.3%. Patients with chronic neck pain are often referred to a physiotherapist and, although many treatments are available, it remains unclear which type of treatment is to be preferred.</p> <p>The objective of this article is to present the design of a randomised clinical trial, Ephysion, which examines the clinical and cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with a physiotherapy treatment for patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Eligible patients with non-specific neck pain persisting longer than 3 months will be randomly allocated to either the behavioural graded activity programme or to the physiotherapy treatment. The graded activity programme is based on an operant approach, which uses a time-contingent method to increase the patient's activity level. This treatment is compared with physiotherapy treatment using a pain-contingent method.</p> <p>Primary treatment outcome is the patient's global perceived effect concerning recovery from the complaint. Global perceived effect on daily functioning is also explored as primary outcome to establish the impact of treatment on daily activity. Direct and indirect costs will also be assessed. Secondary outcomes include the patient's main complaints, pain intensity, medical consumption, functional status, quality of life, and psychological variables. Recruitment of patients will take place up to the end of the year 2004 and follow-up measurement will continue until end 2005.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T05:54:00Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4e14d9ee30e741d99587338ff0369a8e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2474 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T05:54:00Z |
publishDate | 2004-10-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
spelling | doaj.art-4e14d9ee30e741d99587338ff0369a8e2022-12-22T02:08:59ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742004-10-01513410.1186/1471-2474-5-34Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]Vos Cees JGeilen MarioVerhagen Arianne PVonk FriekeKoes Bart W<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic neck pain is a common complaint in the Netherlands with a point prevalence of 14.3%. Patients with chronic neck pain are often referred to a physiotherapist and, although many treatments are available, it remains unclear which type of treatment is to be preferred.</p> <p>The objective of this article is to present the design of a randomised clinical trial, Ephysion, which examines the clinical and cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with a physiotherapy treatment for patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Eligible patients with non-specific neck pain persisting longer than 3 months will be randomly allocated to either the behavioural graded activity programme or to the physiotherapy treatment. The graded activity programme is based on an operant approach, which uses a time-contingent method to increase the patient's activity level. This treatment is compared with physiotherapy treatment using a pain-contingent method.</p> <p>Primary treatment outcome is the patient's global perceived effect concerning recovery from the complaint. Global perceived effect on daily functioning is also explored as primary outcome to establish the impact of treatment on daily activity. Direct and indirect costs will also be assessed. Secondary outcomes include the patient's main complaints, pain intensity, medical consumption, functional status, quality of life, and psychological variables. Recruitment of patients will take place up to the end of the year 2004 and follow-up measurement will continue until end 2005.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/5/34 |
spellingShingle | Vos Cees J Geilen Mario Verhagen Arianne P Vonk Frieke Koes Bart W Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332] BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
title | Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332] |
title_full | Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332] |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332] |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332] |
title_short | Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332] |
title_sort | effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain design of a randomised clinical trial isrctn88733332 |
url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/5/34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vosceesj effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332 AT geilenmario effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332 AT verhagenariannep effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332 AT vonkfrieke effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332 AT koesbartw effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332 |