Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic neck pain is a common complaint in the Netherlands with a point prevalence of 14.3%. Patients with chronic neck pain are often referred to a physiotherapist and, although many treatments are available, it remains unclear whic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vos Cees J, Geilen Mario, Verhagen Arianne P, Vonk Frieke, Koes Bart W
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-10-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/5/34
_version_ 1818010337810579456
author Vos Cees J
Geilen Mario
Verhagen Arianne P
Vonk Frieke
Koes Bart W
author_facet Vos Cees J
Geilen Mario
Verhagen Arianne P
Vonk Frieke
Koes Bart W
author_sort Vos Cees J
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic neck pain is a common complaint in the Netherlands with a point prevalence of 14.3%. Patients with chronic neck pain are often referred to a physiotherapist and, although many treatments are available, it remains unclear which type of treatment is to be preferred.</p> <p>The objective of this article is to present the design of a randomised clinical trial, Ephysion, which examines the clinical and cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with a physiotherapy treatment for patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Eligible patients with non-specific neck pain persisting longer than 3 months will be randomly allocated to either the behavioural graded activity programme or to the physiotherapy treatment. The graded activity programme is based on an operant approach, which uses a time-contingent method to increase the patient's activity level. This treatment is compared with physiotherapy treatment using a pain-contingent method.</p> <p>Primary treatment outcome is the patient's global perceived effect concerning recovery from the complaint. Global perceived effect on daily functioning is also explored as primary outcome to establish the impact of treatment on daily activity. Direct and indirect costs will also be assessed. Secondary outcomes include the patient's main complaints, pain intensity, medical consumption, functional status, quality of life, and psychological variables. Recruitment of patients will take place up to the end of the year 2004 and follow-up measurement will continue until end 2005.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:54:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4e14d9ee30e741d99587338ff0369a8e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:54:00Z
publishDate 2004-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-4e14d9ee30e741d99587338ff0369a8e2022-12-22T02:08:59ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742004-10-01513410.1186/1471-2474-5-34Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]Vos Cees JGeilen MarioVerhagen Arianne PVonk FriekeKoes Bart W<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic neck pain is a common complaint in the Netherlands with a point prevalence of 14.3%. Patients with chronic neck pain are often referred to a physiotherapist and, although many treatments are available, it remains unclear which type of treatment is to be preferred.</p> <p>The objective of this article is to present the design of a randomised clinical trial, Ephysion, which examines the clinical and cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with a physiotherapy treatment for patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Eligible patients with non-specific neck pain persisting longer than 3 months will be randomly allocated to either the behavioural graded activity programme or to the physiotherapy treatment. The graded activity programme is based on an operant approach, which uses a time-contingent method to increase the patient's activity level. This treatment is compared with physiotherapy treatment using a pain-contingent method.</p> <p>Primary treatment outcome is the patient's global perceived effect concerning recovery from the complaint. Global perceived effect on daily functioning is also explored as primary outcome to establish the impact of treatment on daily activity. Direct and indirect costs will also be assessed. Secondary outcomes include the patient's main complaints, pain intensity, medical consumption, functional status, quality of life, and psychological variables. Recruitment of patients will take place up to the end of the year 2004 and follow-up measurement will continue until end 2005.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/5/34
spellingShingle Vos Cees J
Geilen Mario
Verhagen Arianne P
Vonk Frieke
Koes Bart W
Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
title Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]
title_full Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]
title_fullStr Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]
title_short Effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain: design of a randomised clinical trial [ISRCTN88733332]
title_sort effectiveness of behavioural graded activity compared with physiotherapy treatment in chronic neck pain design of a randomised clinical trial isrctn88733332
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/5/34
work_keys_str_mv AT vosceesj effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332
AT geilenmario effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332
AT verhagenariannep effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332
AT vonkfrieke effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332
AT koesbartw effectivenessofbehaviouralgradedactivitycomparedwithphysiotherapytreatmentinchronicneckpaindesignofarandomisedclinicaltrialisrctn88733332