Comparison of the Effect of Preoperative Skin Prepartion with Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine-Gluconate on Surgical Site Infection in Laparotomy Patients

Background and Aim: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common health-care associated infections. Using proper antiseptic solutions for preoperative surgical site skin preparation (skin prep) is one of the methods to reduce SSIs. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fardin Amiri, Arash Khajehvand, Sedigheh Hannani, Nemamali Azadi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022-03-01
Series:پیاورد سلامت
Subjects:
Online Access:http://payavard.tums.ac.ir/article-1-7275-en.pdf
_version_ 1797823077820661760
author Fardin Amiri
Arash Khajehvand
Sedigheh Hannani
Nemamali Azadi
author_facet Fardin Amiri
Arash Khajehvand
Sedigheh Hannani
Nemamali Azadi
author_sort Fardin Amiri
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aim: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common health-care associated infections. Using proper antiseptic solutions for preoperative surgical site skin preparation (skin prep) is one of the methods to reduce SSIs. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of preoperative surgical site skin preparation with povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-gluconate on the rate of SSI in laparotomy patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 Laparotomy surgery patients who referred to Firoozgar hospital in Tehran from May to September of 2021 were included in this clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups which were treated with povidone-iodine(PVI) or chlorhexidine-gluconate (CHG) for surgical site skin prep. Skin prep was done with standard rotational method in two steps by the researcher for each group by using of PVI and CHG. SSI incidence was assessed by a researcher-made check list and also over post-surgical follow up visits by the surgeon. We used Fischer’s exact test, t-test, Chi-square and Cochrane’s Q-test to analyze the collected data. Results: SSI was seen in five patients (14.29%) of PVI group and one patient (2.86%) of CHG group. Although the SSI incidence in PVI group was 5.54 times more than CHG group, still the difference wasn’t statistically significant (P=0.198). Comparing the incidence of SSI’s in 24 hours after surgery (0%) and 30 days after surgery (8.57%) in both groups revealed that using these antiseptics for skin prep was effective in preventing SSI (P<0.001). SSI incidence was also associated with two days of patient’s hospital admission time (P=0.001). Conclusion: The result of this study revealed that the occurrence of SSI in PVI group was 5.54 times more than CHG group. However, the difference was not statistically significant. So both of these antiseptics can be used for surgical site skin prep.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:18:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4e34d97a8bc8405094826ade4ed1ec46
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-8132
2008-2665
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:18:41Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series پیاورد سلامت
spelling doaj.art-4e34d97a8bc8405094826ade4ed1ec462023-05-21T05:35:17ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesپیاورد سلامت1735-81322008-26652022-03-01165412421Comparison of the Effect of Preoperative Skin Prepartion with Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine-Gluconate on Surgical Site Infection in Laparotomy PatientsFardin Amiri0Arash Khajehvand1Sedigheh Hannani2Nemamali Azadi3 Assistant Professor, Department of Operating Room, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Master of Sciences Student in Operating Room, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Instructor, Department of Operating Room, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Background and Aim: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common health-care associated infections. Using proper antiseptic solutions for preoperative surgical site skin preparation (skin prep) is one of the methods to reduce SSIs. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of preoperative surgical site skin preparation with povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-gluconate on the rate of SSI in laparotomy patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 Laparotomy surgery patients who referred to Firoozgar hospital in Tehran from May to September of 2021 were included in this clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups which were treated with povidone-iodine(PVI) or chlorhexidine-gluconate (CHG) for surgical site skin prep. Skin prep was done with standard rotational method in two steps by the researcher for each group by using of PVI and CHG. SSI incidence was assessed by a researcher-made check list and also over post-surgical follow up visits by the surgeon. We used Fischer’s exact test, t-test, Chi-square and Cochrane’s Q-test to analyze the collected data. Results: SSI was seen in five patients (14.29%) of PVI group and one patient (2.86%) of CHG group. Although the SSI incidence in PVI group was 5.54 times more than CHG group, still the difference wasn’t statistically significant (P=0.198). Comparing the incidence of SSI’s in 24 hours after surgery (0%) and 30 days after surgery (8.57%) in both groups revealed that using these antiseptics for skin prep was effective in preventing SSI (P<0.001). SSI incidence was also associated with two days of patient’s hospital admission time (P=0.001). Conclusion: The result of this study revealed that the occurrence of SSI in PVI group was 5.54 times more than CHG group. However, the difference was not statistically significant. So both of these antiseptics can be used for surgical site skin prep.http://payavard.tums.ac.ir/article-1-7275-en.pdfantisepticpovidone-iodinechlorhexidine-gluconatesurgical site infection
spellingShingle Fardin Amiri
Arash Khajehvand
Sedigheh Hannani
Nemamali Azadi
Comparison of the Effect of Preoperative Skin Prepartion with Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine-Gluconate on Surgical Site Infection in Laparotomy Patients
پیاورد سلامت
antiseptic
povidone-iodine
chlorhexidine-gluconate
surgical site infection
title Comparison of the Effect of Preoperative Skin Prepartion with Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine-Gluconate on Surgical Site Infection in Laparotomy Patients
title_full Comparison of the Effect of Preoperative Skin Prepartion with Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine-Gluconate on Surgical Site Infection in Laparotomy Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of the Effect of Preoperative Skin Prepartion with Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine-Gluconate on Surgical Site Infection in Laparotomy Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Effect of Preoperative Skin Prepartion with Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine-Gluconate on Surgical Site Infection in Laparotomy Patients
title_short Comparison of the Effect of Preoperative Skin Prepartion with Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine-Gluconate on Surgical Site Infection in Laparotomy Patients
title_sort comparison of the effect of preoperative skin prepartion with povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate on surgical site infection in laparotomy patients
topic antiseptic
povidone-iodine
chlorhexidine-gluconate
surgical site infection
url http://payavard.tums.ac.ir/article-1-7275-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fardinamiri comparisonoftheeffectofpreoperativeskinprepartionwithpovidoneiodineandchlorhexidinegluconateonsurgicalsiteinfectioninlaparotomypatients
AT arashkhajehvand comparisonoftheeffectofpreoperativeskinprepartionwithpovidoneiodineandchlorhexidinegluconateonsurgicalsiteinfectioninlaparotomypatients
AT sedighehhannani comparisonoftheeffectofpreoperativeskinprepartionwithpovidoneiodineandchlorhexidinegluconateonsurgicalsiteinfectioninlaparotomypatients
AT nemamaliazadi comparisonoftheeffectofpreoperativeskinprepartionwithpovidoneiodineandchlorhexidinegluconateonsurgicalsiteinfectioninlaparotomypatients