The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts
The triad of decline-metamorphosis-rebirth constantly reappears in the history of civilisation, it is current in all historical periods and cultural environments, in different areas and the most diverse contexts. Its manifestations are countless and the same is true of its interpretations. They are...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | Ars & Humanitas |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/5236 |
| _version_ | 1797950021625184256 |
|---|---|
| author | Tine Germ |
| author_facet | Tine Germ |
| author_sort | Tine Germ |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The triad of decline-metamorphosis-rebirth constantly reappears in the history of civilisation, it is current in all historical periods and cultural environments, in different areas and the most diverse contexts. Its manifestations are countless and the same is true of its interpretations. They are especially frequent in the area of art, because the evolutionary model, grounded in the idea of cyclic development comes very handy for explanations and illustrations which seek to present complicated things in a simple and clear way. The history of art, mainly in the 19th century, advocated a tripartite development of art which seeks greater perfection and maturity and reaches its peak just to be then inevitably followed by a decline in artistic originality and power. Already for some time now the evolutionary model has been shown too ineffective in addressing scholarly questions, especially due to oversimplification and a priori classification of subject matter which cannot possibly be classified. The perception that the art of the Early Renaissance was a preliminary period for more mature and accomplished achievements of High Renaissance which at some point began to lose its drive and went into decline either by repeating outmoded forms or their decomposition, is not only naive, but simply wrong and represents a misunderstanding of the essence of art. In much the same way it would be equally wrong to label in advance the early works of a certain artist as not-mature-yet or possessing less artistic authenticity.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T22:09:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4e34e79565964ab8bd4e7864b5adf9a3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1854-9632 2350-4218 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T22:09:46Z |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ars & Humanitas |
| spelling | doaj.art-4e34e79565964ab8bd4e7864b5adf9a32023-01-18T08:53:52ZdeuUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Ars & Humanitas1854-96322350-42182015-12-019210.4312/ars.9.2.5-13The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine ArtsTine Germ The triad of decline-metamorphosis-rebirth constantly reappears in the history of civilisation, it is current in all historical periods and cultural environments, in different areas and the most diverse contexts. Its manifestations are countless and the same is true of its interpretations. They are especially frequent in the area of art, because the evolutionary model, grounded in the idea of cyclic development comes very handy for explanations and illustrations which seek to present complicated things in a simple and clear way. The history of art, mainly in the 19th century, advocated a tripartite development of art which seeks greater perfection and maturity and reaches its peak just to be then inevitably followed by a decline in artistic originality and power. Already for some time now the evolutionary model has been shown too ineffective in addressing scholarly questions, especially due to oversimplification and a priori classification of subject matter which cannot possibly be classified. The perception that the art of the Early Renaissance was a preliminary period for more mature and accomplished achievements of High Renaissance which at some point began to lose its drive and went into decline either by repeating outmoded forms or their decomposition, is not only naive, but simply wrong and represents a misunderstanding of the essence of art. In much the same way it would be equally wrong to label in advance the early works of a certain artist as not-mature-yet or possessing less artistic authenticity. https://journals.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/5236The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts |
| spellingShingle | Tine Germ The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts Ars & Humanitas The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts |
| title | The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts |
| title_full | The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts |
| title_fullStr | The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts |
| title_short | The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts |
| title_sort | paradigm of decline metamorphosis rebirth in fine arts |
| topic | The Paradigm of Decline-Metamorphosis-Rebirth in Fine Arts |
| url | https://journals.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/5236 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tinegerm theparadigmofdeclinemetamorphosisrebirthinfinearts AT tinegerm paradigmofdeclinemetamorphosisrebirthinfinearts |