Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars.
Meta-analytic findings indicate that the success of unmasking a deceptive interaction relies more on the performance of the liar than on that of the lie detector. Despite this finding, the lie characteristics and strategies of deception that enable good liars to evade detection are largely unknown....
Main Authors: | Brianna L Verigin, Ewout H Meijer, Glynis Bogaard, Aldert Vrij |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225566 |
Similar Items
-
The relationship between Japanese adults’ age and self-reported verbal strategies when lying
by: Naoya Tabata, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Detecting lies and deceit : pitfalls and opportunities /
by: 329012 Vrij, Aldert
Published: (2008) -
Dialetheists’ Lies About the Liar
by: Jonas R. B. Arenhart, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Detecting Lies via a Theme-Selection Strategy
by: Nicola Palena, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
by: Letizia Caso, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)