Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure

Background: The treatment of congestion in heart failure (HF) is a challenge despite the therapeutic arsenal available. The aim of this study was to analyze different combinations of diuretics used to resolve congestion in patients admitted for decompensated HF and to define clinical profiles accord...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raquel López-Vilella, Pablo Jover Pastor, Víctor Donoso Trenado, Ignacio Sánchez-Lázaro, Luis Martínez Dolz, Luis Almenar Bonet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1109966623000568
_version_ 1797682523027800064
author Raquel López-Vilella
Pablo Jover Pastor
Víctor Donoso Trenado
Ignacio Sánchez-Lázaro
Luis Martínez Dolz
Luis Almenar Bonet
author_facet Raquel López-Vilella
Pablo Jover Pastor
Víctor Donoso Trenado
Ignacio Sánchez-Lázaro
Luis Martínez Dolz
Luis Almenar Bonet
author_sort Raquel López-Vilella
collection DOAJ
description Background: The treatment of congestion in heart failure (HF) is a challenge despite the therapeutic arsenal available. The aim of this study was to analyze different combinations of diuretics used to resolve congestion in patients admitted for decompensated HF and to define clinical profiles according to these treatments. Methods: Single-center study of 1,559 patients admitted for decompensated HF was done between 2016 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to the diuretic combination that led to clinical stabilization and discharge from the hospital: (1) Loop diuretic. (2) Loop diuretic + distal tubule (antialdosterone ± thiazides). (3) Loop diuretic + distal + proximal tubule (acetazolamide ± SGLT2 inhibitor). (4) Loop diuretic + distal tubule + collecting duct (tolvaptan). (5) Loop diuretic + distal + proximal + collecting duct. Based on these diuretic combinations, profiles with clinical, analytical, and echocardiographic differences were established. Results: There were more previous hospitalizations in groups 4 and 5 (p = 0.001) with a predominance of pulmonary congestion in profiles 1 and 2 and systemic congestion in 3, 4, and 5. Creatinine and CA125 were higher in profiles 4 and 5 (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0001), with no differences in NT-proBNP. Profiles 4 and 5 had a higher proportion of dilatation and depression of right ventricular (p = 0.0001) and left ventricular (p = 0.003) function. Diuretic therapy-defined groups showed difference in clinical characteristics. Conclusions: The diuretic treatment used identifies five clinical profiles according to the degree of congestion, renal function, CA125, and right ventricular functionality. These profiles would guide the best diuretic treatment on admission.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:00:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4e692f91369f4329b0715b02e281b4e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1109-9666
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:00:57Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
spelling doaj.art-4e692f91369f4329b0715b02e281b4e12023-09-18T04:29:45ZengElsevierHellenic Journal of Cardiology1109-96662023-09-017317Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failureRaquel López-Vilella0Pablo Jover Pastor1Víctor Donoso Trenado2Ignacio Sánchez-Lázaro3Luis Martínez Dolz4Luis Almenar Bonet5Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Corresponding author. Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, 106, Fernando Abril Martorell Av, PC 46026, Valencia, Spain.Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, SpainHeart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, SpainHeart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, SpainCardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, SpainHeart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, SpainBackground: The treatment of congestion in heart failure (HF) is a challenge despite the therapeutic arsenal available. The aim of this study was to analyze different combinations of diuretics used to resolve congestion in patients admitted for decompensated HF and to define clinical profiles according to these treatments. Methods: Single-center study of 1,559 patients admitted for decompensated HF was done between 2016 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to the diuretic combination that led to clinical stabilization and discharge from the hospital: (1) Loop diuretic. (2) Loop diuretic + distal tubule (antialdosterone ± thiazides). (3) Loop diuretic + distal + proximal tubule (acetazolamide ± SGLT2 inhibitor). (4) Loop diuretic + distal tubule + collecting duct (tolvaptan). (5) Loop diuretic + distal + proximal + collecting duct. Based on these diuretic combinations, profiles with clinical, analytical, and echocardiographic differences were established. Results: There were more previous hospitalizations in groups 4 and 5 (p = 0.001) with a predominance of pulmonary congestion in profiles 1 and 2 and systemic congestion in 3, 4, and 5. Creatinine and CA125 were higher in profiles 4 and 5 (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0001), with no differences in NT-proBNP. Profiles 4 and 5 had a higher proportion of dilatation and depression of right ventricular (p = 0.0001) and left ventricular (p = 0.003) function. Diuretic therapy-defined groups showed difference in clinical characteristics. Conclusions: The diuretic treatment used identifies five clinical profiles according to the degree of congestion, renal function, CA125, and right ventricular functionality. These profiles would guide the best diuretic treatment on admission.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1109966623000568heart failurecongestiondiureticsclinical profilestreatment
spellingShingle Raquel López-Vilella
Pablo Jover Pastor
Víctor Donoso Trenado
Ignacio Sánchez-Lázaro
Luis Martínez Dolz
Luis Almenar Bonet
Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
heart failure
congestion
diuretics
clinical profiles
treatment
title Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure
title_full Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure
title_fullStr Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure
title_short Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure
title_sort clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure
topic heart failure
congestion
diuretics
clinical profiles
treatment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1109966623000568
work_keys_str_mv AT raquellopezvilella clinicalphenotypesaccordingtodiureticcombinationinacuteheartfailure
AT pablojoverpastor clinicalphenotypesaccordingtodiureticcombinationinacuteheartfailure
AT victordonosotrenado clinicalphenotypesaccordingtodiureticcombinationinacuteheartfailure
AT ignaciosanchezlazaro clinicalphenotypesaccordingtodiureticcombinationinacuteheartfailure
AT luismartinezdolz clinicalphenotypesaccordingtodiureticcombinationinacuteheartfailure
AT luisalmenarbonet clinicalphenotypesaccordingtodiureticcombinationinacuteheartfailure