The Relevance of Causal Social Construction

Social constructionist claims are surprising and interesting when they entail that presumably natural kinds are in fact socially constructed. The claims are interesting because of their theoretical and political importance. Authors like Díaz-León argue that constitutive social construction is more...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teresa Marques
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Vienna 2016-10-01
Series:Journal of Social Ontology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6822
_version_ 1797818202747568128
author Teresa Marques
author_facet Teresa Marques
author_sort Teresa Marques
collection DOAJ
description Social constructionist claims are surprising and interesting when they entail that presumably natural kinds are in fact socially constructed. The claims are interesting because of their theoretical and political importance. Authors like Díaz-León argue that constitutive social construction is more relevant for achieving social justice than causal social construction. This paper challenges this claim. Assuming there are socially salient groups that are discriminated against, the paper presents a dilemma: if there were no constitutively constructed social kinds, the causes of the discrimination of existing social groups would have to be addressed, and understanding causal social construction would be relevant to achieve social justice. On the other hand, not all possible constitutively socially constructed kinds are actual social kinds. If an existing social group is constitutively constructed as a social kind K, the fact that it actually exists as a K has social causes. Again, causal social construction is relevant. The paper argues that (i) for any actual social kind X, if X is constitutively socially constructed as K, then it is also causally socially constructed; and (ii) causal social construction is at least as relevant as constitutive social construction for concerns of social justice. For illustration, I draw upon two phenomena that are presumed to contribute towards the discrimination of women: (i) the poor performance effects of stereotype threat, and (ii) the silencing effects of gendered language use.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:05:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4e6d80e60855407dbc76545cf3929974
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-9663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:05:41Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher University of Vienna
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Ontology
spelling doaj.art-4e6d80e60855407dbc76545cf39299742023-05-28T07:32:22ZengUniversity of ViennaJournal of Social Ontology2196-96632016-10-0131The Relevance of Causal Social ConstructionTeresa Marques0Universitat Pompeu Fabra Social constructionist claims are surprising and interesting when they entail that presumably natural kinds are in fact socially constructed. The claims are interesting because of their theoretical and political importance. Authors like Díaz-León argue that constitutive social construction is more relevant for achieving social justice than causal social construction. This paper challenges this claim. Assuming there are socially salient groups that are discriminated against, the paper presents a dilemma: if there were no constitutively constructed social kinds, the causes of the discrimination of existing social groups would have to be addressed, and understanding causal social construction would be relevant to achieve social justice. On the other hand, not all possible constitutively socially constructed kinds are actual social kinds. If an existing social group is constitutively constructed as a social kind K, the fact that it actually exists as a K has social causes. Again, causal social construction is relevant. The paper argues that (i) for any actual social kind X, if X is constitutively socially constructed as K, then it is also causally socially constructed; and (ii) causal social construction is at least as relevant as constitutive social construction for concerns of social justice. For illustration, I draw upon two phenomena that are presumed to contribute towards the discrimination of women: (i) the poor performance effects of stereotype threat, and (ii) the silencing effects of gendered language use. https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6822social constructioncausal constructionismconstitutive constructionismsilencingstereotype threat
spellingShingle Teresa Marques
The Relevance of Causal Social Construction
Journal of Social Ontology
social construction
causal constructionism
constitutive constructionism
silencing
stereotype threat
title The Relevance of Causal Social Construction
title_full The Relevance of Causal Social Construction
title_fullStr The Relevance of Causal Social Construction
title_full_unstemmed The Relevance of Causal Social Construction
title_short The Relevance of Causal Social Construction
title_sort relevance of causal social construction
topic social construction
causal constructionism
constitutive constructionism
silencing
stereotype threat
url https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6822
work_keys_str_mv AT teresamarques therelevanceofcausalsocialconstruction
AT teresamarques relevanceofcausalsocialconstruction