Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long‐term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta‐analysis

Abstract Objectives We compared the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with those of warfarin in the long‐term (≥6 months) treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Methods We searched electronic databases up to November 2023 to compare the use of DOACs and warfarin in CV...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Redoy Ranjan, Gie Ken‐Dror, Pankaj Sharma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-02-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1869
_version_ 1797221141472870400
author Redoy Ranjan
Gie Ken‐Dror
Pankaj Sharma
author_facet Redoy Ranjan
Gie Ken‐Dror
Pankaj Sharma
author_sort Redoy Ranjan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives We compared the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with those of warfarin in the long‐term (≥6 months) treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Methods We searched electronic databases up to November 2023 to compare the use of DOACs and warfarin in CVT management. Modified Rankin scores (mRS), new intracranial hemorrhage, all‐cause mortality, recurrence and nonrecanalisation events were used to assess outcome. RevMan v5.4 software and the Cochran‐Mantel‐Haenszel method were utilized to analyse data. Results A total of 25 studies involving 2301 patients were identified as having treated CVT with either DOACs or warfarin. Good long‐term mRS scores 0–2 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98–1.03; p = 0.61), new intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.48–2.08; p = 0.99), all‐cause mortality (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.50–1.98; p = 0.99), nonrecanalisation (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.77–1.18; p = 0.65) and recurrence venous thrombosis events (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.33–1.22; p = 0.17) were similar between the two treatment arms. Subgroup analysis found recurrence of venous thrombosis was lower in the rivaroxaban group compared to warfarin (2.2% vs. 8.5%, RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.11–0.98; p = 0.05). Conclusion DOACs and warfarin provide comparable long‐term safety and efficacy profiles. DOACs may be preferred over warfarin due to their ease of clinical management.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T19:01:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4e866d1d715d4d3cb0703171bf802ba2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-8835
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:00:43Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj.art-4e866d1d715d4d3cb0703171bf802ba22024-04-05T11:41:32ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352024-02-0172n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.1869Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long‐term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta‐analysisRedoy Ranjan0Gie Ken‐Dror1Pankaj Sharma2Department of Cardiac Surgery Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka BangladeshInstitute of Cardiovascular Research Royal Holloway University of London (ICR2UL) Greater London UKInstitute of Cardiovascular Research Royal Holloway University of London (ICR2UL) Greater London UKAbstract Objectives We compared the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with those of warfarin in the long‐term (≥6 months) treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Methods We searched electronic databases up to November 2023 to compare the use of DOACs and warfarin in CVT management. Modified Rankin scores (mRS), new intracranial hemorrhage, all‐cause mortality, recurrence and nonrecanalisation events were used to assess outcome. RevMan v5.4 software and the Cochran‐Mantel‐Haenszel method were utilized to analyse data. Results A total of 25 studies involving 2301 patients were identified as having treated CVT with either DOACs or warfarin. Good long‐term mRS scores 0–2 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98–1.03; p = 0.61), new intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.48–2.08; p = 0.99), all‐cause mortality (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.50–1.98; p = 0.99), nonrecanalisation (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.77–1.18; p = 0.65) and recurrence venous thrombosis events (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.33–1.22; p = 0.17) were similar between the two treatment arms. Subgroup analysis found recurrence of venous thrombosis was lower in the rivaroxaban group compared to warfarin (2.2% vs. 8.5%, RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.11–0.98; p = 0.05). Conclusion DOACs and warfarin provide comparable long‐term safety and efficacy profiles. DOACs may be preferred over warfarin due to their ease of clinical management.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1869apixabancerebral venous thrombosisdabigatrandirect oral anticoagulantsedoxabanefficacy
spellingShingle Redoy Ranjan
Gie Ken‐Dror
Pankaj Sharma
Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long‐term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta‐analysis
Health Science Reports
apixaban
cerebral venous thrombosis
dabigatran
direct oral anticoagulants
edoxaban
efficacy
title Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long‐term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta‐analysis
title_full Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long‐term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long‐term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long‐term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta‐analysis
title_short Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long‐term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta‐analysis
title_sort direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long term management of cerebral venous thrombosis a comprehensive meta analysis
topic apixaban
cerebral venous thrombosis
dabigatran
direct oral anticoagulants
edoxaban
efficacy
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1869
work_keys_str_mv AT redoyranjan directoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarininlongtermmanagementofcerebralvenousthrombosisacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT giekendror directoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarininlongtermmanagementofcerebralvenousthrombosisacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT pankajsharma directoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarininlongtermmanagementofcerebralvenousthrombosisacomprehensivemetaanalysis