A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study

BackgroundNumerous studies have identified risk factors for physical restraint (PR) use in older adults in long-term care facilities. Nevertheless, there is a lack of predictive tools to identify high-risk individuals. ObjectiveWe aimed to develop machine learning...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Wang, Hongmei Chen, Houwei Wang, Weichu Liu, Daomei Peng, Qinghua Zhao, Mingzhao Xiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2023-04-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e43815
_version_ 1827857416975286272
author Jun Wang
Hongmei Chen
Houwei Wang
Weichu Liu
Daomei Peng
Qinghua Zhao
Mingzhao Xiao
author_facet Jun Wang
Hongmei Chen
Houwei Wang
Weichu Liu
Daomei Peng
Qinghua Zhao
Mingzhao Xiao
author_sort Jun Wang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundNumerous studies have identified risk factors for physical restraint (PR) use in older adults in long-term care facilities. Nevertheless, there is a lack of predictive tools to identify high-risk individuals. ObjectiveWe aimed to develop machine learning (ML)–based models to predict the risk of PR in older adults. MethodsThis study conducted a cross-sectional secondary data analysis based on 1026 older adults from 6 long-term care facilities in Chongqing, China, from July 2019 to November 2019. The primary outcome was the use of PR (yes or no), identified by 2 collectors’ direct observation. A total of 15 candidate predictors (older adults’ demographic and clinical factors) that could be commonly and easily collected from clinical practice were used to build 9 independent ML models: Gaussian Naïve Bayesian (GNB), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree (DT), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (Lightgbm), as well as stacking ensemble ML. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, an F score, a comprehensive evaluation indicator (CEI) weighed by the above indicators, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A net benefit approach using the decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of the best model. Models were tested via 10-fold cross-validation. Feature importance was interpreted using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). ResultsA total of 1026 older adults (mean 83.5, SD 7.6 years; n=586, 57.1% male older adults) and 265 restrained older adults were included in the study. All ML models performed well, with an AUC above 0.905 and an F score above 0.900. The 2 best independent models are RF (AUC 0.938, 95% CI 0.914-0.947) and SVM (AUC 0.949, 95% CI 0.911-0.953). The DCA demonstrated that the RF model displayed better clinical utility than other models. The stacking model combined with SVM, RF, and MLP performed best with AUC (0.950) and CEI (0.943) values, as well as the DCA curve indicated the best clinical utility. The SHAP plots demonstrated that the significant contributors to model performance were related to cognitive impairment, care dependency, mobility decline, physical agitation, and an indwelling tube. ConclusionsThe RF and stacking models had high performance and clinical utility. ML prediction models for predicting the probability of PR in older adults could offer clinical screening and decision support, which could help medical staff in the early identification and PR management of older adults.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:40:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4e8676f1ce584955af8bc2f4c965424f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1438-8871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:40:13Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
spelling doaj.art-4e8676f1ce584955af8bc2f4c965424f2023-08-28T23:51:28ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712023-04-0125e4381510.2196/43815A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning StudyJun Wanghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-7135Hongmei Chenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2302-2117Houwei Wanghttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-8255-9640Weichu Liuhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-6204-8758Daomei Penghttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-7411-4207Qinghua Zhaohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-3128Mingzhao Xiaohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-5971 BackgroundNumerous studies have identified risk factors for physical restraint (PR) use in older adults in long-term care facilities. Nevertheless, there is a lack of predictive tools to identify high-risk individuals. ObjectiveWe aimed to develop machine learning (ML)–based models to predict the risk of PR in older adults. MethodsThis study conducted a cross-sectional secondary data analysis based on 1026 older adults from 6 long-term care facilities in Chongqing, China, from July 2019 to November 2019. The primary outcome was the use of PR (yes or no), identified by 2 collectors’ direct observation. A total of 15 candidate predictors (older adults’ demographic and clinical factors) that could be commonly and easily collected from clinical practice were used to build 9 independent ML models: Gaussian Naïve Bayesian (GNB), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree (DT), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (Lightgbm), as well as stacking ensemble ML. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, an F score, a comprehensive evaluation indicator (CEI) weighed by the above indicators, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A net benefit approach using the decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of the best model. Models were tested via 10-fold cross-validation. Feature importance was interpreted using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). ResultsA total of 1026 older adults (mean 83.5, SD 7.6 years; n=586, 57.1% male older adults) and 265 restrained older adults were included in the study. All ML models performed well, with an AUC above 0.905 and an F score above 0.900. The 2 best independent models are RF (AUC 0.938, 95% CI 0.914-0.947) and SVM (AUC 0.949, 95% CI 0.911-0.953). The DCA demonstrated that the RF model displayed better clinical utility than other models. The stacking model combined with SVM, RF, and MLP performed best with AUC (0.950) and CEI (0.943) values, as well as the DCA curve indicated the best clinical utility. The SHAP plots demonstrated that the significant contributors to model performance were related to cognitive impairment, care dependency, mobility decline, physical agitation, and an indwelling tube. ConclusionsThe RF and stacking models had high performance and clinical utility. ML prediction models for predicting the probability of PR in older adults could offer clinical screening and decision support, which could help medical staff in the early identification and PR management of older adults.https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e43815
spellingShingle Jun Wang
Hongmei Chen
Houwei Wang
Weichu Liu
Daomei Peng
Qinghua Zhao
Mingzhao Xiao
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study
Journal of Medical Internet Research
title A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study
title_full A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study
title_fullStr A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study
title_full_unstemmed A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study
title_short A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study
title_sort risk prediction model for physical restraints among older chinese adults in long term care facilities machine learning study
url https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e43815
work_keys_str_mv AT junwang ariskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT hongmeichen ariskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT houweiwang ariskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT weichuliu ariskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT daomeipeng ariskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT qinghuazhao ariskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT mingzhaoxiao ariskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT junwang riskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT hongmeichen riskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT houweiwang riskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT weichuliu riskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT daomeipeng riskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT qinghuazhao riskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy
AT mingzhaoxiao riskpredictionmodelforphysicalrestraintsamongolderchineseadultsinlongtermcarefacilitiesmachinelearningstudy