The Built Environment Plan 2.0

Around the mid 1980’s, the appealing perspective of the plan for built environment came out of the debate on the themes of building restoration. Since then different changes of cultural and normative context occurred. The contribution explores such dynamics, enucleating and deepening three matters -...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Massimo Lauria
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2016-11-01
Series:Techne
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/techne/article/view/4581
_version_ 1811278168701534208
author Massimo Lauria
author_facet Massimo Lauria
author_sort Massimo Lauria
collection DOAJ
description Around the mid 1980’s, the appealing perspective of the plan for built environment came out of the debate on the themes of building restoration. Since then different changes of cultural and normative context occurred. The contribution explores such dynamics, enucleating and deepening three matters - knowledge, responsibility, service life - that, in their trend, have contributed and still contribute to redraw scientific, technical and operational frontiers of relationship between maintenance and transformation. Thereby the paper faces some of the crux that allow a critical observation of the development dynamics of the idea, and of its meaning, concerns what is still today decodable as plan for built environment.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:30:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4e8e31ca7c7a4965bd3d9578b0fa4c20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2239-0243
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:30:55Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Firenze University Press
record_format Article
series Techne
spelling doaj.art-4e8e31ca7c7a4965bd3d9578b0fa4c202022-12-22T03:10:28ZengFirenze University PressTechne2239-02432016-11-011210.13128/Techne-1933816160The Built Environment Plan 2.0Massimo LauriaAround the mid 1980’s, the appealing perspective of the plan for built environment came out of the debate on the themes of building restoration. Since then different changes of cultural and normative context occurred. The contribution explores such dynamics, enucleating and deepening three matters - knowledge, responsibility, service life - that, in their trend, have contributed and still contribute to redraw scientific, technical and operational frontiers of relationship between maintenance and transformation. Thereby the paper faces some of the crux that allow a critical observation of the development dynamics of the idea, and of its meaning, concerns what is still today decodable as plan for built environment.https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/techne/article/view/4581Plan for built environmentKnowledgeResponsibility
spellingShingle Massimo Lauria
The Built Environment Plan 2.0
Techne
Plan for built environment
Knowledge
Responsibility
title The Built Environment Plan 2.0
title_full The Built Environment Plan 2.0
title_fullStr The Built Environment Plan 2.0
title_full_unstemmed The Built Environment Plan 2.0
title_short The Built Environment Plan 2.0
title_sort built environment plan 2 0
topic Plan for built environment
Knowledge
Responsibility
url https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/techne/article/view/4581
work_keys_str_mv AT massimolauria thebuiltenvironmentplan20
AT massimolauria builtenvironmentplan20