Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.

In most habitats, vegetation provides the main structure of the environment. This complexity can facilitate biodiversity and ecosystem services. Therefore, measures of vegetation structure can serve as indicators in ecosystem management. However, many structural measures are laborious and require ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gemma Rutten, Andreas Ensslin, Andreas Hemp, Markus Fischer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4583428?pdf=render
_version_ 1829142668007964672
author Gemma Rutten
Andreas Ensslin
Andreas Hemp
Markus Fischer
author_facet Gemma Rutten
Andreas Ensslin
Andreas Hemp
Markus Fischer
author_sort Gemma Rutten
collection DOAJ
description In most habitats, vegetation provides the main structure of the environment. This complexity can facilitate biodiversity and ecosystem services. Therefore, measures of vegetation structure can serve as indicators in ecosystem management. However, many structural measures are laborious and require expert knowledge. Here, we used consistent and convenient measures to assess vegetation structure over an exceptionally broad elevation gradient of 866-4550 m above sea level at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Additionally, we compared (human)-modified habitats, including maize fields, traditionally managed home gardens, grasslands, commercial coffee farms and logged and burned forests with natural habitats along this elevation gradient. We distinguished vertical and horizontal vegetation structure to account for habitat complexity and heterogeneity. Vertical vegetation structure (assessed as number, width and density of vegetation layers, maximum canopy height, leaf area index and vegetation cover) displayed a unimodal elevation pattern, peaking at intermediate elevations in montane forests, whereas horizontal structure (assessed as coefficient of variation of number, width and density of vegetation layers, maximum canopy height, leaf area index and vegetation cover) was lowest at intermediate altitudes. Overall, vertical structure was consistently lower in modified than in natural habitat types, whereas horizontal structure was inconsistently different in modified than in natural habitat types, depending on the specific structural measure and habitat type. Our study shows how vertical and horizontal vegetation structure can be assessed efficiently in various habitat types in tropical mountain regions, and we suggest to apply this as a tool for informing future biodiversity and ecosystem service studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T20:35:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4e9b0adf13d64270b5d7dfa8f3239fd5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T20:35:23Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-4e9b0adf13d64270b5d7dfa8f3239fd52022-12-21T22:48:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01109e013882210.1371/journal.pone.0138822Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.Gemma RuttenAndreas EnsslinAndreas HempMarkus FischerIn most habitats, vegetation provides the main structure of the environment. This complexity can facilitate biodiversity and ecosystem services. Therefore, measures of vegetation structure can serve as indicators in ecosystem management. However, many structural measures are laborious and require expert knowledge. Here, we used consistent and convenient measures to assess vegetation structure over an exceptionally broad elevation gradient of 866-4550 m above sea level at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Additionally, we compared (human)-modified habitats, including maize fields, traditionally managed home gardens, grasslands, commercial coffee farms and logged and burned forests with natural habitats along this elevation gradient. We distinguished vertical and horizontal vegetation structure to account for habitat complexity and heterogeneity. Vertical vegetation structure (assessed as number, width and density of vegetation layers, maximum canopy height, leaf area index and vegetation cover) displayed a unimodal elevation pattern, peaking at intermediate elevations in montane forests, whereas horizontal structure (assessed as coefficient of variation of number, width and density of vegetation layers, maximum canopy height, leaf area index and vegetation cover) was lowest at intermediate altitudes. Overall, vertical structure was consistently lower in modified than in natural habitat types, whereas horizontal structure was inconsistently different in modified than in natural habitat types, depending on the specific structural measure and habitat type. Our study shows how vertical and horizontal vegetation structure can be assessed efficiently in various habitat types in tropical mountain regions, and we suggest to apply this as a tool for informing future biodiversity and ecosystem service studies.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4583428?pdf=render
spellingShingle Gemma Rutten
Andreas Ensslin
Andreas Hemp
Markus Fischer
Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.
PLoS ONE
title Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.
title_full Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.
title_fullStr Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.
title_full_unstemmed Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.
title_short Vertical and Horizontal Vegetation Structure across Natural and Modified Habitat Types at Mount Kilimanjaro.
title_sort vertical and horizontal vegetation structure across natural and modified habitat types at mount kilimanjaro
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4583428?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT gemmarutten verticalandhorizontalvegetationstructureacrossnaturalandmodifiedhabitattypesatmountkilimanjaro
AT andreasensslin verticalandhorizontalvegetationstructureacrossnaturalandmodifiedhabitattypesatmountkilimanjaro
AT andreashemp verticalandhorizontalvegetationstructureacrossnaturalandmodifiedhabitattypesatmountkilimanjaro
AT markusfischer verticalandhorizontalvegetationstructureacrossnaturalandmodifiedhabitattypesatmountkilimanjaro