Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques

Purpose: Tensioning technique at graft fixation is one of key factors for successful outcomes in ACL reconstruction. The tensioning boot, which had two tensioners and was fixed to the tibia with a bandage, was developed for precise graft tensioning. The purpose was to compare the anterior knee laxit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatsuo Mae, Yukiyoshi Toritsuka, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Ryohei Uchida, Shigeto Nakagawa, Konsei Shino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-04-01
Series:Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687322000048
_version_ 1828280458275717120
author Tatsuo Mae
Yukiyoshi Toritsuka
Hiroyuki Nakamura
Ryohei Uchida
Shigeto Nakagawa
Konsei Shino
author_facet Tatsuo Mae
Yukiyoshi Toritsuka
Hiroyuki Nakamura
Ryohei Uchida
Shigeto Nakagawa
Konsei Shino
author_sort Tatsuo Mae
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Tensioning technique at graft fixation is one of key factors for successful outcomes in ACL reconstruction. The tensioning boot, which had two tensioners and was fixed to the tibia with a bandage, was developed for precise graft tensioning. The purpose was to compare the anterior knee laxity between the manual tensioning and the tensioning boot techniques immediately after ACL reconstruction under anesthesia in order to elucidate the effectiveness of using the tensioning boot. Methods: 33 patients had anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon graft. After grafts were fixed with EndoButton-CL on lateral femoral cortex, grafts were tied to Double Spike Plate (DSP). Each graft was pre-tensioning with 20 N (totally 40 N) at 20 degree of flexion for 3 minutes using manually-held tensioner in 11 patients and using tensioner installed to tensioning boot in the remaining 22 patients before graft fixation, and were then fixed in the same manner. Tibial displacement under 67 and 89 N of tibial anterior load was measured by KT-2000 Knee Arthrometer under anesthesia before and immediately after operation. Results: The anterior knee laxity in the operated knee was 4.5 ± 1.0 mm in the manual tensioning group and 2.9 ± 0.9 mm in the tensioning boot group at 89 N of anterior load, showing a significant difference. (P < .0001) The side-to-side difference in the manual tensioning group was significantly less than that in the tensioning boot group. (P = .002) Conclusions: Anterior laxity of the operated knees as well as KT side-to-side difference immediately after ACL reconstruction was larger in the tensioning boot technique than the manual tensioning technique, when the graft was fixed in the same manner. Thus, the initial tension at graft fixation with the tensioning boot can be smaller than 40 N.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:59:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ea31577838c42ddad05f2d5d901b644
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-6873
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:59:57Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology
spelling doaj.art-4ea31577838c42ddad05f2d5d901b6442022-12-22T02:55:18ZengElsevierAsia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology2214-68732022-04-01282124Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniquesTatsuo Mae0Yukiyoshi Toritsuka1Hiroyuki Nakamura2Ryohei Uchida3Shigeto Nakagawa4Konsei Shino5Department of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, 3-1-69, Inabaso, Amagasaki, Hyogo, 660-0064, Japan; Corresponding author. Dept. of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Osaka Univ. Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.School of Health and Sports Sciences, Mukogawa Women's University, 6-46, Ikebiraki, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8558, Japan; Department of Sports Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, 3-1-69, Inabaso, Amagasaki, Hyogo, 660-0064, JapanSoai Orthopedic Surgery, 2-8, Suehiro-cho, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 665-0031, JapanDepartment of Sports Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, 3-1-69, Inabaso, Amagasaki, Hyogo, 660-0064, JapanDepartment of Sports Orthopaedic Surgery, Yukioka Hospital, 2-2-3, Ukita, Kita-ku, Osaka, 530-0021, JapanSports Orthopaedic Center, Yukioka Hospital, 2-2-3, Ukita, Kita-ku, Osaka, 530-0021, JapanPurpose: Tensioning technique at graft fixation is one of key factors for successful outcomes in ACL reconstruction. The tensioning boot, which had two tensioners and was fixed to the tibia with a bandage, was developed for precise graft tensioning. The purpose was to compare the anterior knee laxity between the manual tensioning and the tensioning boot techniques immediately after ACL reconstruction under anesthesia in order to elucidate the effectiveness of using the tensioning boot. Methods: 33 patients had anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon graft. After grafts were fixed with EndoButton-CL on lateral femoral cortex, grafts were tied to Double Spike Plate (DSP). Each graft was pre-tensioning with 20 N (totally 40 N) at 20 degree of flexion for 3 minutes using manually-held tensioner in 11 patients and using tensioner installed to tensioning boot in the remaining 22 patients before graft fixation, and were then fixed in the same manner. Tibial displacement under 67 and 89 N of tibial anterior load was measured by KT-2000 Knee Arthrometer under anesthesia before and immediately after operation. Results: The anterior knee laxity in the operated knee was 4.5 ± 1.0 mm in the manual tensioning group and 2.9 ± 0.9 mm in the tensioning boot group at 89 N of anterior load, showing a significant difference. (P < .0001) The side-to-side difference in the manual tensioning group was significantly less than that in the tensioning boot group. (P = .002) Conclusions: Anterior laxity of the operated knees as well as KT side-to-side difference immediately after ACL reconstruction was larger in the tensioning boot technique than the manual tensioning technique, when the graft was fixed in the same manner. Thus, the initial tension at graft fixation with the tensioning boot can be smaller than 40 N.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687322000048ACLLaxityTensioningGraftFixationInitial tension
spellingShingle Tatsuo Mae
Yukiyoshi Toritsuka
Hiroyuki Nakamura
Ryohei Uchida
Shigeto Nakagawa
Konsei Shino
Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques
Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology
ACL
Laxity
Tensioning
Graft
Fixation
Initial tension
title Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques
title_full Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques
title_fullStr Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques
title_short Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques
title_sort comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques
topic ACL
Laxity
Tensioning
Graft
Fixation
Initial tension
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687322000048
work_keys_str_mv AT tatsuomae comparisonofanteriorkneelaxityimmediatelyafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmanualtensioningvstensioningboottechniques
AT yukiyoshitoritsuka comparisonofanteriorkneelaxityimmediatelyafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmanualtensioningvstensioningboottechniques
AT hiroyukinakamura comparisonofanteriorkneelaxityimmediatelyafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmanualtensioningvstensioningboottechniques
AT ryoheiuchida comparisonofanteriorkneelaxityimmediatelyafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmanualtensioningvstensioningboottechniques
AT shigetonakagawa comparisonofanteriorkneelaxityimmediatelyafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmanualtensioningvstensioningboottechniques
AT konseishino comparisonofanteriorkneelaxityimmediatelyafteranatomicdoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmanualtensioningvstensioningboottechniques