A New Class of Uracil–DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors Active against Human and Vaccinia Virus Enzyme

Uracil–DNA glycosylases are enzymes that excise uracil bases appearing in DNA as a result of cytosine deamination or accidental dUMP incorporation from the dUTP pool. The activity of Family 1 uracil–DNA glycosylase (UNG) activity limits the efficiency of antimetabolite drugs and is essential for vir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Inga R. Grin, Grigory V. Mechetin, Rustem D. Kasymov, Evgeniia A. Diatlova, Anna V. Yudkina, Sergei N. Shchelkunov, Irina P. Gileva, Alexandra A. Denisova, Grigoriy A. Stepanov, Ghermes G. Chilov, Dmitry O. Zharkov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/21/6668
_version_ 1797511998013964288
author Inga R. Grin
Grigory V. Mechetin
Rustem D. Kasymov
Evgeniia A. Diatlova
Anna V. Yudkina
Sergei N. Shchelkunov
Irina P. Gileva
Alexandra A. Denisova
Grigoriy A. Stepanov
Ghermes G. Chilov
Dmitry O. Zharkov
author_facet Inga R. Grin
Grigory V. Mechetin
Rustem D. Kasymov
Evgeniia A. Diatlova
Anna V. Yudkina
Sergei N. Shchelkunov
Irina P. Gileva
Alexandra A. Denisova
Grigoriy A. Stepanov
Ghermes G. Chilov
Dmitry O. Zharkov
author_sort Inga R. Grin
collection DOAJ
description Uracil–DNA glycosylases are enzymes that excise uracil bases appearing in DNA as a result of cytosine deamination or accidental dUMP incorporation from the dUTP pool. The activity of Family 1 uracil–DNA glycosylase (UNG) activity limits the efficiency of antimetabolite drugs and is essential for virulence in some bacterial and viral infections. Thus, UNG is regarded as a promising target for antitumor, antiviral, antibacterial, and antiprotozoal drugs. Most UNG inhibitors presently developed are based on the uracil base linked to various substituents, yet new pharmacophores are wanted to target a wide range of UNGs. We have conducted virtual screening of a 1,027,767-ligand library and biochemically screened the best hits for the inhibitory activity against human and vaccinia virus UNG enzymes. Although even the best inhibitors had IC<sub>50</sub> ≥ 100 μM, they were highly enriched in a common fragment, tetrahydro-2,4,6-trioxopyrimidinylidene (PyO3). In silico, PyO3 preferably docked into the enzyme’s active site, and in kinetic experiments, the inhibition was better consistent with the competitive mechanism. The toxicity of two best inhibitors for human cells was independent of the presence of methotrexate, which is consistent with the hypothesis that dUMP in genomic DNA is less toxic for the cell than strand breaks arising from the massive removal of uracil. We conclude that PyO3 may be a novel pharmacophore with the potential for development into UNG-targeting agents.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:55:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4eccb9b2add64a62a6373d3ddfe88e90
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1420-3049
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:55:46Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj.art-4eccb9b2add64a62a6373d3ddfe88e902023-11-22T21:24:44ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492021-11-012621666810.3390/molecules26216668A New Class of Uracil–DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors Active against Human and Vaccinia Virus EnzymeInga R. Grin0Grigory V. Mechetin1Rustem D. Kasymov2Evgeniia A. Diatlova3Anna V. Yudkina4Sergei N. Shchelkunov5Irina P. Gileva6Alexandra A. Denisova7Grigoriy A. Stepanov8Ghermes G. Chilov9Dmitry O. Zharkov10SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, RussiaSB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, RussiaSB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, RussiaSB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, RussiaSB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, RussiaDepartment of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogova Street, Novosibirsk 630090, RussiaState Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR, Koltsovo 630559, Novosibirsk Region, RussiaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, RussiaNational Research University Higher School of Economics, 20 Myasnitskaya Street, Moscow 101000, RussiaZelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 47 Leninsky Avenue, Moscow 119334, RussiaSB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, RussiaUracil–DNA glycosylases are enzymes that excise uracil bases appearing in DNA as a result of cytosine deamination or accidental dUMP incorporation from the dUTP pool. The activity of Family 1 uracil–DNA glycosylase (UNG) activity limits the efficiency of antimetabolite drugs and is essential for virulence in some bacterial and viral infections. Thus, UNG is regarded as a promising target for antitumor, antiviral, antibacterial, and antiprotozoal drugs. Most UNG inhibitors presently developed are based on the uracil base linked to various substituents, yet new pharmacophores are wanted to target a wide range of UNGs. We have conducted virtual screening of a 1,027,767-ligand library and biochemically screened the best hits for the inhibitory activity against human and vaccinia virus UNG enzymes. Although even the best inhibitors had IC<sub>50</sub> ≥ 100 μM, they were highly enriched in a common fragment, tetrahydro-2,4,6-trioxopyrimidinylidene (PyO3). In silico, PyO3 preferably docked into the enzyme’s active site, and in kinetic experiments, the inhibition was better consistent with the competitive mechanism. The toxicity of two best inhibitors for human cells was independent of the presence of methotrexate, which is consistent with the hypothesis that dUMP in genomic DNA is less toxic for the cell than strand breaks arising from the massive removal of uracil. We conclude that PyO3 may be a novel pharmacophore with the potential for development into UNG-targeting agents.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/21/6668DNA repairuracil–DNA glycosylaseinhibitorsvirtual screeningpyrimidines
spellingShingle Inga R. Grin
Grigory V. Mechetin
Rustem D. Kasymov
Evgeniia A. Diatlova
Anna V. Yudkina
Sergei N. Shchelkunov
Irina P. Gileva
Alexandra A. Denisova
Grigoriy A. Stepanov
Ghermes G. Chilov
Dmitry O. Zharkov
A New Class of Uracil–DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors Active against Human and Vaccinia Virus Enzyme
Molecules
DNA repair
uracil–DNA glycosylase
inhibitors
virtual screening
pyrimidines
title A New Class of Uracil–DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors Active against Human and Vaccinia Virus Enzyme
title_full A New Class of Uracil–DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors Active against Human and Vaccinia Virus Enzyme
title_fullStr A New Class of Uracil–DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors Active against Human and Vaccinia Virus Enzyme
title_full_unstemmed A New Class of Uracil–DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors Active against Human and Vaccinia Virus Enzyme
title_short A New Class of Uracil–DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors Active against Human and Vaccinia Virus Enzyme
title_sort new class of uracil dna glycosylase inhibitors active against human and vaccinia virus enzyme
topic DNA repair
uracil–DNA glycosylase
inhibitors
virtual screening
pyrimidines
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/21/6668
work_keys_str_mv AT ingargrin anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT grigoryvmechetin anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT rustemdkasymov anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT evgeniiaadiatlova anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT annavyudkina anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT sergeinshchelkunov anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT irinapgileva anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT alexandraadenisova anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT grigoriyastepanov anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT ghermesgchilov anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT dmitryozharkov anewclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT ingargrin newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT grigoryvmechetin newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT rustemdkasymov newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT evgeniiaadiatlova newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT annavyudkina newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT sergeinshchelkunov newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT irinapgileva newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT alexandraadenisova newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT grigoriyastepanov newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT ghermesgchilov newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme
AT dmitryozharkov newclassofuracildnaglycosylaseinhibitorsactiveagainsthumanandvacciniavirusenzyme