Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review

Objective/background This study aimed to review the current evidence on the application of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice and its clinical outcomes over the last 10 years. Methods A systematic review was performed on studies published in English in the decade 2008 to 2017, retri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goris Hung KN, Kenneth NK Fong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-06-01
Series:Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1569186119849119
_version_ 1818341531279425536
author Goris Hung KN
Kenneth NK Fong
author_facet Goris Hung KN
Kenneth NK Fong
author_sort Goris Hung KN
collection DOAJ
description Objective/background This study aimed to review the current evidence on the application of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice and its clinical outcomes over the last 10 years. Methods A systematic review was performed on studies published in English in the decade 2008 to 2017, retrieved from seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, SAGE, Science Direct and EMBASE). Only articles evaluating the use of telerehabilitation to provide occupational therapy services from a distance were included, with no restrictions on pathology, impairment, age, or the nature of occupational therapy intervention. Results Fifteen articles (three randomised controlled trials, eight quasi-experimental studies, one trial with single-group post-intervention and three case studies) were reviewed. Despite various study designs and outcome measures, most studies indicated positive therapeutic effects of using telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice. There is insufficient evidence, however, to confirm that telerehabilitation is more effective than the face-to-face model. Little evidence was shown on the long-term effect and cost efficacy. Only two studies used smartphones in their applications. Conclusion Telerehabilitation offers an alternative service delivery model for occupational therapy, not only bridging distance but also offering user-friendly treatment for patients at home. Further research, particularly on the use of the most cutting-edge mobile technology, is needed to determine effectiveness in occupational therapy practice treating various diseases, conditions and impairments and the characteristics of patients, interventions and therapists that lead to the best fit with this alternative and emerging form of service delivery.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:00:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ed4238eac974b449e4f516b143f747c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1569-1861
1876-4398
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:00:16Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy
spelling doaj.art-4ed4238eac974b449e4f516b143f747c2022-12-21T23:39:11ZengSAGE PublishingHong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy1569-18611876-43982019-06-013210.1177/1569186119849119Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic reviewGoris Hung KNKenneth NK FongObjective/background This study aimed to review the current evidence on the application of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice and its clinical outcomes over the last 10 years. Methods A systematic review was performed on studies published in English in the decade 2008 to 2017, retrieved from seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, SAGE, Science Direct and EMBASE). Only articles evaluating the use of telerehabilitation to provide occupational therapy services from a distance were included, with no restrictions on pathology, impairment, age, or the nature of occupational therapy intervention. Results Fifteen articles (three randomised controlled trials, eight quasi-experimental studies, one trial with single-group post-intervention and three case studies) were reviewed. Despite various study designs and outcome measures, most studies indicated positive therapeutic effects of using telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice. There is insufficient evidence, however, to confirm that telerehabilitation is more effective than the face-to-face model. Little evidence was shown on the long-term effect and cost efficacy. Only two studies used smartphones in their applications. Conclusion Telerehabilitation offers an alternative service delivery model for occupational therapy, not only bridging distance but also offering user-friendly treatment for patients at home. Further research, particularly on the use of the most cutting-edge mobile technology, is needed to determine effectiveness in occupational therapy practice treating various diseases, conditions and impairments and the characteristics of patients, interventions and therapists that lead to the best fit with this alternative and emerging form of service delivery.https://doi.org/10.1177/1569186119849119
spellingShingle Goris Hung KN
Kenneth NK Fong
Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review
Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy
title Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review
title_full Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review
title_fullStr Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review
title_short Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review
title_sort effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice a systematic review
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1569186119849119
work_keys_str_mv AT gorishungkn effectsoftelerehabilitationinoccupationaltherapypracticeasystematicreview
AT kennethnkfong effectsoftelerehabilitationinoccupationaltherapypracticeasystematicreview