“It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
Objective: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-D...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-04-01
|
Series: | Gynecologic Oncology Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922000285 |
_version_ | 1818275145975857152 |
---|---|
author | Caroline Gellman Charlotte Ezratty Julia Schwarz Valentin Kolev Stephanie V. Blank |
author_facet | Caroline Gellman Charlotte Ezratty Julia Schwarz Valentin Kolev Stephanie V. Blank |
author_sort | Caroline Gellman |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-DO as a risk reduction strategy. Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with previvors and transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti® software, two primary investigators interpreted data through thematic analysis. After coding four interviews, the investigators discussed discrepancies between codes with a moderator and resolved and refined code. The investigators applied the universal codebook to all interviews and revised the codebook using an iterative approach. Examining codes within and across interviews allowed for major themes and patterns to emerge. Results: Interviews were conducted with seventeen previvors (ages 31–46). 6 (25%) previvors had a BRCA1 mutation, 7 (41%), a BRCA2 mutation, 3 (13%), a Lynch-related mutation, and 1 (6%), other (MUTYH mutation). At the time of interview, 12 previvors (71%) were planning (6) or had undergone (6) RRS-DO, 4 (23%) were planning (1) or had undergone (3) risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and 1 (6%) was undecided. Three major themes emerged: motivating factors for selecting surgical risk reduction option, barriers complicating surgical decision-making, and facilitating factors for surgical decision-making. RRS-DO-focused previvors prioritized avoiding menopause, and they also emphasized that self-advocacy and building rapport with providers facilitated their decision-making. Conclusion: By understanding previvors’ priorities and experiences, physicians can better partner with previvors as they navigate their ovarian cancer risk reduction journey. This will ultimately optimize shared decision-making. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T22:25:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4ee009e9109641eca0bed4b2a83f3f01 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2352-5789 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T22:25:06Z |
publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Gynecologic Oncology Reports |
spelling | doaj.art-4ee009e9109641eca0bed4b2a83f3f012022-12-22T00:09:48ZengElsevierGynecologic Oncology Reports2352-57892022-04-0140100948“It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomyCaroline Gellman0Charlotte Ezratty1Julia Schwarz2Valentin Kolev3Stephanie V. Blank4Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1176 Fifth Avenue, 9/F, New York, NY 10029, United States.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecologic and Reproductive Science, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecologic and Reproductive Science, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Blavatnik Family Women’s Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesObjective: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-DO as a risk reduction strategy. Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with previvors and transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti® software, two primary investigators interpreted data through thematic analysis. After coding four interviews, the investigators discussed discrepancies between codes with a moderator and resolved and refined code. The investigators applied the universal codebook to all interviews and revised the codebook using an iterative approach. Examining codes within and across interviews allowed for major themes and patterns to emerge. Results: Interviews were conducted with seventeen previvors (ages 31–46). 6 (25%) previvors had a BRCA1 mutation, 7 (41%), a BRCA2 mutation, 3 (13%), a Lynch-related mutation, and 1 (6%), other (MUTYH mutation). At the time of interview, 12 previvors (71%) were planning (6) or had undergone (6) RRS-DO, 4 (23%) were planning (1) or had undergone (3) risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and 1 (6%) was undecided. Three major themes emerged: motivating factors for selecting surgical risk reduction option, barriers complicating surgical decision-making, and facilitating factors for surgical decision-making. RRS-DO-focused previvors prioritized avoiding menopause, and they also emphasized that self-advocacy and building rapport with providers facilitated their decision-making. Conclusion: By understanding previvors’ priorities and experiences, physicians can better partner with previvors as they navigate their ovarian cancer risk reduction journey. This will ultimately optimize shared decision-making.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922000285BRCALynch syndromeRisk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomyOvarian cancer risk reductionQualitative research |
spellingShingle | Caroline Gellman Charlotte Ezratty Julia Schwarz Valentin Kolev Stephanie V. Blank “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy Gynecologic Oncology Reports BRCA Lynch syndrome Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy Ovarian cancer risk reduction Qualitative research |
title | “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy |
title_full | “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy |
title_fullStr | “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy |
title_short | “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy |
title_sort | it was a no brainer a qualitative study of factors driving previvors decision making when considering risk reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy |
topic | BRCA Lynch syndrome Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy Ovarian cancer risk reduction Qualitative research |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922000285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carolinegellman itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy AT charlotteezratty itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy AT juliaschwarz itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy AT valentinkolev itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy AT stephanievblank itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy |