“It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy

Objective: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline Gellman, Charlotte Ezratty, Julia Schwarz, Valentin Kolev, Stephanie V. Blank
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-04-01
Series:Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922000285
_version_ 1818275145975857152
author Caroline Gellman
Charlotte Ezratty
Julia Schwarz
Valentin Kolev
Stephanie V. Blank
author_facet Caroline Gellman
Charlotte Ezratty
Julia Schwarz
Valentin Kolev
Stephanie V. Blank
author_sort Caroline Gellman
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-DO as a risk reduction strategy. Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with previvors and transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti® software, two primary investigators interpreted data through thematic analysis. After coding four interviews, the investigators discussed discrepancies between codes with a moderator and resolved and refined code. The investigators applied the universal codebook to all interviews and revised the codebook using an iterative approach. Examining codes within and across interviews allowed for major themes and patterns to emerge. Results: Interviews were conducted with seventeen previvors (ages 31–46). 6 (25%) previvors had a BRCA1 mutation, 7 (41%), a BRCA2 mutation, 3 (13%), a Lynch-related mutation, and 1 (6%), other (MUTYH mutation). At the time of interview, 12 previvors (71%) were planning (6) or had undergone (6) RRS-DO, 4 (23%) were planning (1) or had undergone (3) risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and 1 (6%) was undecided. Three major themes emerged: motivating factors for selecting surgical risk reduction option, barriers complicating surgical decision-making, and facilitating factors for surgical decision-making. RRS-DO-focused previvors prioritized avoiding menopause, and they also emphasized that self-advocacy and building rapport with providers facilitated their decision-making. Conclusion: By understanding previvors’ priorities and experiences, physicians can better partner with previvors as they navigate their ovarian cancer risk reduction journey. This will ultimately optimize shared decision-making.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:25:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ee009e9109641eca0bed4b2a83f3f01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-5789
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:25:06Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Gynecologic Oncology Reports
spelling doaj.art-4ee009e9109641eca0bed4b2a83f3f012022-12-22T00:09:48ZengElsevierGynecologic Oncology Reports2352-57892022-04-0140100948“It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomyCaroline Gellman0Charlotte Ezratty1Julia Schwarz2Valentin Kolev3Stephanie V. Blank4Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1176 Fifth Avenue, 9/F, New York, NY 10029, United States.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecologic and Reproductive Science, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecologic and Reproductive Science, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Blavatnik Family Women’s Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesObjective: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-DO as a risk reduction strategy. Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with previvors and transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti® software, two primary investigators interpreted data through thematic analysis. After coding four interviews, the investigators discussed discrepancies between codes with a moderator and resolved and refined code. The investigators applied the universal codebook to all interviews and revised the codebook using an iterative approach. Examining codes within and across interviews allowed for major themes and patterns to emerge. Results: Interviews were conducted with seventeen previvors (ages 31–46). 6 (25%) previvors had a BRCA1 mutation, 7 (41%), a BRCA2 mutation, 3 (13%), a Lynch-related mutation, and 1 (6%), other (MUTYH mutation). At the time of interview, 12 previvors (71%) were planning (6) or had undergone (6) RRS-DO, 4 (23%) were planning (1) or had undergone (3) risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and 1 (6%) was undecided. Three major themes emerged: motivating factors for selecting surgical risk reduction option, barriers complicating surgical decision-making, and facilitating factors for surgical decision-making. RRS-DO-focused previvors prioritized avoiding menopause, and they also emphasized that self-advocacy and building rapport with providers facilitated their decision-making. Conclusion: By understanding previvors’ priorities and experiences, physicians can better partner with previvors as they navigate their ovarian cancer risk reduction journey. This will ultimately optimize shared decision-making.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922000285BRCALynch syndromeRisk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomyOvarian cancer risk reductionQualitative research
spellingShingle Caroline Gellman
Charlotte Ezratty
Julia Schwarz
Valentin Kolev
Stephanie V. Blank
“It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
BRCA
Lynch syndrome
Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
Ovarian cancer risk reduction
Qualitative research
title “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_full “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_fullStr “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_full_unstemmed “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_short “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_sort it was a no brainer a qualitative study of factors driving previvors decision making when considering risk reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
topic BRCA
Lynch syndrome
Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
Ovarian cancer risk reduction
Qualitative research
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578922000285
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinegellman itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy
AT charlotteezratty itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy
AT juliaschwarz itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy
AT valentinkolev itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy
AT stephanievblank itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy