Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure

The effect of microstructure on the efficiency of shielding or shunting of the magnetic flux by permalloy shields was investigated in the present work. For this purpose, the FeNi shielding coatings with different grain structures were obtained using stationary and pulsed electrodeposition. The coati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatiana Zubar, Sergey Grabchikov, Anna Kotelnikova, Egor Kaniukov, Maksim Kutuzau, Karin Leistner, Kornelius Nielsch, Tatiana Vershinina, Daria Tishkevich, Oleg Kanafyev, Artem Kozlovskiy, Maxim Zdorovets, Valery Fedosyuk, Alex Trukhanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Nanomaterials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/3/634
_version_ 1797414651880800256
author Tatiana Zubar
Sergey Grabchikov
Anna Kotelnikova
Egor Kaniukov
Maksim Kutuzau
Karin Leistner
Kornelius Nielsch
Tatiana Vershinina
Daria Tishkevich
Oleg Kanafyev
Artem Kozlovskiy
Maxim Zdorovets
Valery Fedosyuk
Alex Trukhanov
author_facet Tatiana Zubar
Sergey Grabchikov
Anna Kotelnikova
Egor Kaniukov
Maksim Kutuzau
Karin Leistner
Kornelius Nielsch
Tatiana Vershinina
Daria Tishkevich
Oleg Kanafyev
Artem Kozlovskiy
Maxim Zdorovets
Valery Fedosyuk
Alex Trukhanov
author_sort Tatiana Zubar
collection DOAJ
description The effect of microstructure on the efficiency of shielding or shunting of the magnetic flux by permalloy shields was investigated in the present work. For this purpose, the FeNi shielding coatings with different grain structures were obtained using stationary and pulsed electrodeposition. The coatings’ composition, crystal structure, surface microstructure, magnetic domain structure, and shielding efficiency were studied. It has been shown that coatings with 0.2–0.6 µm grains have a disordered domain structure. Consequently, a higher value of the shielding efficiency was achieved, but the working range was too limited. The reason for this is probably the hindered movement of the domain boundaries. Samples with nanosized grains have an ordered two-domain magnetic structure with a permissible partial transition to a superparamagnetic state in regions with a grain size of less than 100 nm. The ordered magnetic structure, the small size of the domain, and the coexistence of ferromagnetic and superparamagnetic regions, although they reduce the maximum value of the shielding efficiency, significantly expand the working range in the nanostructured permalloy shielding coatings. As a result, a dependence between the grain and domain structure and the efficiency of magnetostatic shielding was found.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:36:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ee3e030227c48a0a837226dd8ccfee9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-4991
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:36:35Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nanomaterials
spelling doaj.art-4ee3e030227c48a0a837226dd8ccfee92023-12-03T12:27:55ZengMDPI AGNanomaterials2079-49912021-03-0111363410.3390/nano11030634Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their MicrostructureTatiana Zubar0Sergey Grabchikov1Anna Kotelnikova2Egor Kaniukov3Maksim Kutuzau4Karin Leistner5Kornelius Nielsch6Tatiana Vershinina7Daria Tishkevich8Oleg Kanafyev9Artem Kozlovskiy10Maxim Zdorovets11Valery Fedosyuk12Alex Trukhanov13Laboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, BelarusLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, BelarusLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, BelarusDepartment of Technology of Electronics Materials, National University of Science and Technology MISiS, 119049 Moscow, RussiaLeibniz IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 01069 Dresden, GermanyLeibniz IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 01069 Dresden, GermanyLeibniz IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 01069 Dresden, GermanyJoint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, RussiaLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, BelarusLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, BelarusThe Institute of Nuclear Physics, Almaty 050032, KazakhstanThe Institute of Nuclear Physics, Almaty 050032, KazakhstanLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, BelarusLaboratory of Magnetic Films Physics, Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, BelarusThe effect of microstructure on the efficiency of shielding or shunting of the magnetic flux by permalloy shields was investigated in the present work. For this purpose, the FeNi shielding coatings with different grain structures were obtained using stationary and pulsed electrodeposition. The coatings’ composition, crystal structure, surface microstructure, magnetic domain structure, and shielding efficiency were studied. It has been shown that coatings with 0.2–0.6 µm grains have a disordered domain structure. Consequently, a higher value of the shielding efficiency was achieved, but the working range was too limited. The reason for this is probably the hindered movement of the domain boundaries. Samples with nanosized grains have an ordered two-domain magnetic structure with a permissible partial transition to a superparamagnetic state in regions with a grain size of less than 100 nm. The ordered magnetic structure, the small size of the domain, and the coexistence of ferromagnetic and superparamagnetic regions, although they reduce the maximum value of the shielding efficiency, significantly expand the working range in the nanostructured permalloy shielding coatings. As a result, a dependence between the grain and domain structure and the efficiency of magnetostatic shielding was found.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/3/634permalloypulsed electrodepositionnanostructured coatingmicrostructuremagnetostatic shielding
spellingShingle Tatiana Zubar
Sergey Grabchikov
Anna Kotelnikova
Egor Kaniukov
Maksim Kutuzau
Karin Leistner
Kornelius Nielsch
Tatiana Vershinina
Daria Tishkevich
Oleg Kanafyev
Artem Kozlovskiy
Maxim Zdorovets
Valery Fedosyuk
Alex Trukhanov
Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure
Nanomaterials
permalloy
pulsed electrodeposition
nanostructured coating
microstructure
magnetostatic shielding
title Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure
title_full Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure
title_fullStr Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure
title_short Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure
title_sort efficiency of magnetostatic protection using nanostructured permalloy shielding coatings depending on their microstructure
topic permalloy
pulsed electrodeposition
nanostructured coating
microstructure
magnetostatic shielding
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/3/634
work_keys_str_mv AT tatianazubar efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT sergeygrabchikov efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT annakotelnikova efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT egorkaniukov efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT maksimkutuzau efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT karinleistner efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT korneliusnielsch efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT tatianavershinina efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT dariatishkevich efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT olegkanafyev efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT artemkozlovskiy efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT maximzdorovets efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT valeryfedosyuk efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure
AT alextrukhanov efficiencyofmagnetostaticprotectionusingnanostructuredpermalloyshieldingcoatingsdependingontheirmicrostructure