Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single‐blinded trial

Abstract Background and Aims Bowel preparation affects the quality of colonoscopy. Reaching the optimal preparation has been a challenge for years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the sole FDA‐approved substance for this purpose. However, patients find it unpleasant and often complain about its adverse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Sadeghi, Khaled Rahmani, Pardis Ketabi Moghadam, Saeed Abdi, Ali Jahanian, Mobin Fathy, Mahsa Mohammadi, Mehran Mahdavi Roshan, Meysam Olfatifar, Mohammad Reza Zali, Mohammad Reza Hatamnejad, Mohsen Rajabnia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-09-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.829
_version_ 1797772383725027328
author Amir Sadeghi
Khaled Rahmani
Pardis Ketabi Moghadam
Saeed Abdi
Ali Jahanian
Mobin Fathy
Mahsa Mohammadi
Mehran Mahdavi Roshan
Meysam Olfatifar
Mohammad Reza Zali
Mohammad Reza Hatamnejad
Mohsen Rajabnia
author_facet Amir Sadeghi
Khaled Rahmani
Pardis Ketabi Moghadam
Saeed Abdi
Ali Jahanian
Mobin Fathy
Mahsa Mohammadi
Mehran Mahdavi Roshan
Meysam Olfatifar
Mohammad Reza Zali
Mohammad Reza Hatamnejad
Mohsen Rajabnia
author_sort Amir Sadeghi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and Aims Bowel preparation affects the quality of colonoscopy. Reaching the optimal preparation has been a challenge for years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the sole FDA‐approved substance for this purpose. However, patients find it unpleasant and often complain about its adverse effects. In this study, we aimed to reduce these complaints by lowering the amount of PEG and adding senna which is an herbal stimulant laxative. Methods Four hundred and eighty‐six patients were admitted for colonoscopy. Finally, 382 patients were enrolled in the study and we divided them into two groups; 186 patients were placed in which conventional high volume PEG‐alone regimen was consumed and 196 patients in which low volume PEG plus senna regimen was offered. The quality of colon preparation was compared between the two groups by independent two samples t‐test (or its corresponding nonparametric test), Fisher's exact, or χ2 test in SPSS software version 22. Results The colon preparation quality was equally efficient in the two groups as 69.36% in the high volume PEG group and 71.94% in PEG plus senna group had adequate bowel preparation (p = 0.58). Adverse effects, like nausea, bloating, headache, and sleeplessness were significantly less in the low volume PEG plus senna group. Conclusion Besides the fact that bowel preparation by low volume PEG plus senna combination was noninferior to the conventional high volume PEG‐alone regimen, the side effects were much less common with the low volume PEG plus senna regimen.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:50:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ee6c6ad6f704c048e36eff4327e2a96
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-8835
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:50:04Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj.art-4ee6c6ad6f704c048e36eff4327e2a962023-07-26T04:11:54ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352022-09-0155n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.829Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single‐blinded trialAmir Sadeghi0Khaled Rahmani1Pardis Ketabi Moghadam2Saeed Abdi3Ali Jahanian4Mobin Fathy5Mahsa Mohammadi6Mehran Mahdavi Roshan7Meysam Olfatifar8Mohammad Reza Zali9Mohammad Reza Hatamnejad10Mohsen Rajabnia11Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranLiver and Digestive Research Center Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences Sanandaj IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranGastroenterology and Hepataology Diseases Research Center Qom University of Medical Sciences Qom IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranResearch Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science Tehran IranAbstract Background and Aims Bowel preparation affects the quality of colonoscopy. Reaching the optimal preparation has been a challenge for years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the sole FDA‐approved substance for this purpose. However, patients find it unpleasant and often complain about its adverse effects. In this study, we aimed to reduce these complaints by lowering the amount of PEG and adding senna which is an herbal stimulant laxative. Methods Four hundred and eighty‐six patients were admitted for colonoscopy. Finally, 382 patients were enrolled in the study and we divided them into two groups; 186 patients were placed in which conventional high volume PEG‐alone regimen was consumed and 196 patients in which low volume PEG plus senna regimen was offered. The quality of colon preparation was compared between the two groups by independent two samples t‐test (or its corresponding nonparametric test), Fisher's exact, or χ2 test in SPSS software version 22. Results The colon preparation quality was equally efficient in the two groups as 69.36% in the high volume PEG group and 71.94% in PEG plus senna group had adequate bowel preparation (p = 0.58). Adverse effects, like nausea, bloating, headache, and sleeplessness were significantly less in the low volume PEG plus senna group. Conclusion Besides the fact that bowel preparation by low volume PEG plus senna combination was noninferior to the conventional high volume PEG‐alone regimen, the side effects were much less common with the low volume PEG plus senna regimen.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.829bowel preparationcolonoscopylaxativespolyethylene glycolsennaside effects
spellingShingle Amir Sadeghi
Khaled Rahmani
Pardis Ketabi Moghadam
Saeed Abdi
Ali Jahanian
Mobin Fathy
Mahsa Mohammadi
Mehran Mahdavi Roshan
Meysam Olfatifar
Mohammad Reza Zali
Mohammad Reza Hatamnejad
Mohsen Rajabnia
Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single‐blinded trial
Health Science Reports
bowel preparation
colonoscopy
laxatives
polyethylene glycol
senna
side effects
title Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single‐blinded trial
title_full Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single‐blinded trial
title_fullStr Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single‐blinded trial
title_full_unstemmed Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single‐blinded trial
title_short Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single‐blinded trial
title_sort low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy a randomized controlled and single blinded trial
topic bowel preparation
colonoscopy
laxatives
polyethylene glycol
senna
side effects
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.829
work_keys_str_mv AT amirsadeghi lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT khaledrahmani lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT pardisketabimoghadam lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT saeedabdi lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT alijahanian lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT mobinfathy lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT mahsamohammadi lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT mehranmahdaviroshan lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT meysamolfatifar lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT mohammadrezazali lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT mohammadrezahatamnejad lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial
AT mohsenrajabnia lowvolumepolyethyleneglycolcombinedwithsennaversushighvolumepolyethyleneglycolwhichregimenisbetterforbowelpreparationforcolonoscopyarandomizedcontrolledandsingleblindedtrial