A Tale of Two Protected Areas: “Value and Nature Conservation” in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and Russia
This study explores how local communities reflect on institutional frameworks and protected area governance in two national parks (NPs) with similar nature values in Estonia and Russia, and aims to understand the role of value systems in these interactions. It is based on 50 in-depth interviews with...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
| Series: | Land |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/274 |
| _version_ | 1797412487434338304 |
|---|---|
| author | Henri Järv Anton Shkaruba Olga Likhacheva Viktar Kireyeu Raymond Ward Kalev Sepp |
| author_facet | Henri Järv Anton Shkaruba Olga Likhacheva Viktar Kireyeu Raymond Ward Kalev Sepp |
| author_sort | Henri Järv |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study explores how local communities reflect on institutional frameworks and protected area governance in two national parks (NPs) with similar nature values in Estonia and Russia, and aims to understand the role of value systems in these interactions. It is based on 50 in-depth interviews with a broad range of stakeholders, and a desktop analysis of relevant regulation and plans. Interview questions reflect on various aspects of well-being (including fairness of governance solutions), awareness of NPs’ function and restrictions, related value aspects, and covered basic personal data needed to interpret the interviews. The study reconfirms the pivotal role of social justice as a driver of wellbeing. In particular, it articulates the significance of value systems playing the role of filters between governance inputs and specific management activities of communities. It underlines the vulnerability of such systems at a community level, most of all to the impacts related to various instances of “centralization”. They are manifested through the choice of restrictive measures and top-down arrangements at the expense of transparency and inclusiveness (in Russia), as well as through the removal of governance autonomy from NPs and transferring monitoring and enforcement functions to local communities without clear mandates or sufficient capacity (in Estonia). |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T05:03:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4ee6d93190df47d4ab274fa15c583e18 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-445X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T05:03:22Z |
| publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Land |
| spelling | doaj.art-4ee6d93190df47d4ab274fa15c583e182023-12-03T12:57:27ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-03-0110327410.3390/land10030274A Tale of Two Protected Areas: “Value and Nature Conservation” in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and RussiaHenri Järv0Anton Shkaruba1Olga Likhacheva2Viktar Kireyeu3Raymond Ward4Kalev Sepp5Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, EstoniaInstitute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, EstoniaDepartment of Botany and Plant Ecology, Pskov State University, Lenin Square, 2, 180000 Pskov, RussiaEcological Safety & Sustainable Development of Regions, Saint Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, RussiaInstitute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, EstoniaInstitute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, EstoniaThis study explores how local communities reflect on institutional frameworks and protected area governance in two national parks (NPs) with similar nature values in Estonia and Russia, and aims to understand the role of value systems in these interactions. It is based on 50 in-depth interviews with a broad range of stakeholders, and a desktop analysis of relevant regulation and plans. Interview questions reflect on various aspects of well-being (including fairness of governance solutions), awareness of NPs’ function and restrictions, related value aspects, and covered basic personal data needed to interpret the interviews. The study reconfirms the pivotal role of social justice as a driver of wellbeing. In particular, it articulates the significance of value systems playing the role of filters between governance inputs and specific management activities of communities. It underlines the vulnerability of such systems at a community level, most of all to the impacts related to various instances of “centralization”. They are manifested through the choice of restrictive measures and top-down arrangements at the expense of transparency and inclusiveness (in Russia), as well as through the removal of governance autonomy from NPs and transferring monitoring and enforcement functions to local communities without clear mandates or sufficient capacity (in Estonia).https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/274national parkswellbeinggovernance of protected areaslocal communitiescultural landscapesmanagement of protected areas |
| spellingShingle | Henri Järv Anton Shkaruba Olga Likhacheva Viktar Kireyeu Raymond Ward Kalev Sepp A Tale of Two Protected Areas: “Value and Nature Conservation” in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and Russia Land national parks wellbeing governance of protected areas local communities cultural landscapes management of protected areas |
| title | A Tale of Two Protected Areas: “Value and Nature Conservation” in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and Russia |
| title_full | A Tale of Two Protected Areas: “Value and Nature Conservation” in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and Russia |
| title_fullStr | A Tale of Two Protected Areas: “Value and Nature Conservation” in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and Russia |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Tale of Two Protected Areas: “Value and Nature Conservation” in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and Russia |
| title_short | A Tale of Two Protected Areas: “Value and Nature Conservation” in Comparable National Parks in Estonia and Russia |
| title_sort | tale of two protected areas value and nature conservation in comparable national parks in estonia and russia |
| topic | national parks wellbeing governance of protected areas local communities cultural landscapes management of protected areas |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/274 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT henrijarv ataleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT antonshkaruba ataleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT olgalikhacheva ataleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT viktarkireyeu ataleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT raymondward ataleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT kalevsepp ataleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT henrijarv taleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT antonshkaruba taleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT olgalikhacheva taleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT viktarkireyeu taleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT raymondward taleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia AT kalevsepp taleoftwoprotectedareasvalueandnatureconservationincomparablenationalparksinestoniaandrussia |