Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimation of the Detection Limit of Quantitative NMR

Limit of detection (LOD), which indicates the detection ability of an analytical method, is an important parameter used in validating quantitative 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method. Different approaches to evaluate LOD have been reported in literature, including the calibration curve approa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei CHEN, Hong-bing LIU, Hui-li LIU
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Science Press 2022-06-01
Series:Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Subjects:
Online Access:http://121.43.60.238/bpxzz/article/2022/1000-4556/20220211.shtml
_version_ 1811206498448048128
author Lei CHEN
Hong-bing LIU
Hui-li LIU
author_facet Lei CHEN
Hong-bing LIU
Hui-li LIU
author_sort Lei CHEN
collection DOAJ
description Limit of detection (LOD), which indicates the detection ability of an analytical method, is an important parameter used in validating quantitative 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method. Different approaches to evaluate LOD have been reported in literature, including the calibration curve approach, regression parameters-based approach, ASTM approach (proposed by American Society of Testing Materials), EPA approach (established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency) and the signal-to-noise ratio approach. In this study, systemic analyses and summaries of all mentioned approaches were given together with their principles, equations and characteristics. A novel approach based on signal-to-ratio regression curve for determining the detection limit was proposed, which can overcome weaknesses of the signal-to-noise ratio approach. The LOD of liquid-state 1H NMR method in the determination of sodium formate in aqueous solution was calculated using 5 different approaches. The influence of the number of scans on LOD was discussed. The results showed that the LOD was in the range of 10.4~14.4 μmol/L when the number of scans was 64 with 700 MHz NMR spectrometer. In conclusion, the study can provide a reference for determining the LOD of 1H quantitative NMR.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:48:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ef15409aa1e4f618e0ef9429ab05ace
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1000-4556
language zho
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:48:28Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Science Press
record_format Article
series Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance
spelling doaj.art-4ef15409aa1e4f618e0ef9429ab05ace2022-12-22T03:49:03ZzhoScience PressChinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance1000-45562022-06-01390223024210.11938/cjmr20212944Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimation of the Detection Limit of Quantitative NMRLei CHEN0Hong-bing LIU1Hui-li LIU2State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, ChinaLimit of detection (LOD), which indicates the detection ability of an analytical method, is an important parameter used in validating quantitative 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method. Different approaches to evaluate LOD have been reported in literature, including the calibration curve approach, regression parameters-based approach, ASTM approach (proposed by American Society of Testing Materials), EPA approach (established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency) and the signal-to-noise ratio approach. In this study, systemic analyses and summaries of all mentioned approaches were given together with their principles, equations and characteristics. A novel approach based on signal-to-ratio regression curve for determining the detection limit was proposed, which can overcome weaknesses of the signal-to-noise ratio approach. The LOD of liquid-state 1H NMR method in the determination of sodium formate in aqueous solution was calculated using 5 different approaches. The influence of the number of scans on LOD was discussed. The results showed that the LOD was in the range of 10.4~14.4 μmol/L when the number of scans was 64 with 700 MHz NMR spectrometer. In conclusion, the study can provide a reference for determining the LOD of 1H quantitative NMR.http://121.43.60.238/bpxzz/article/2022/1000-4556/20220211.shtmlliquid-state nuclear magnetic resonancequantitative detectionlimit of detection (lod)signal-to-noise regression approach
spellingShingle Lei CHEN
Hong-bing LIU
Hui-li LIU
Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimation of the Detection Limit of Quantitative NMR
Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance
liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance
quantitative detection
limit of detection (lod)
signal-to-noise regression approach
title Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimation of the Detection Limit of Quantitative NMR
title_full Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimation of the Detection Limit of Quantitative NMR
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimation of the Detection Limit of Quantitative NMR
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimation of the Detection Limit of Quantitative NMR
title_short Comparison of Different Approaches for Estimation of the Detection Limit of Quantitative NMR
title_sort comparison of different approaches for estimation of the detection limit of quantitative nmr
topic liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance
quantitative detection
limit of detection (lod)
signal-to-noise regression approach
url http://121.43.60.238/bpxzz/article/2022/1000-4556/20220211.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT leichen comparisonofdifferentapproachesforestimationofthedetectionlimitofquantitativenmr
AT hongbingliu comparisonofdifferentapproachesforestimationofthedetectionlimitofquantitativenmr
AT huililiu comparisonofdifferentapproachesforestimationofthedetectionlimitofquantitativenmr