Matching Biomedical Ontologies through Adaptive Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm

To integrate massive amounts of heterogeneous biomedical data in biomedical ontologies and to provide more options for clinical diagnosis, this work proposes an adaptive Multi-modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (aMMOEA) to match two heterogeneous biomedical ontologies by finding the semant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xingsi Xue, Pei-Wei Tsai, Yucheng Zhuang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/12/1287
_version_ 1797506505211117568
author Xingsi Xue
Pei-Wei Tsai
Yucheng Zhuang
author_facet Xingsi Xue
Pei-Wei Tsai
Yucheng Zhuang
author_sort Xingsi Xue
collection DOAJ
description To integrate massive amounts of heterogeneous biomedical data in biomedical ontologies and to provide more options for clinical diagnosis, this work proposes an adaptive Multi-modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (aMMOEA) to match two heterogeneous biomedical ontologies by finding the semantically identical concepts. In particular, we first propose two evaluation metrics on the alignment’s quality, which calculate the alignment’s statistical and its logical features, i.e., its f-measure and its conservativity. On this basis, we build a novel multi-objective optimization model for the biomedical ontology matching problem. By analyzing the essence of this problem, we point out that it is a large-scale Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization Problem (MMOP) with sparse Pareto optimal solutions. Then, we propose a problem-specific aMMOEA to solve this problem, which uses the Guiding Matrix (GM) to adaptively guide the algorithm’s convergence and diversity in both objective and decision spaces. The experiment uses Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI)’s biomedical tracks to test aMMOEA’s performance, and comparisons with two state-of-the-art MOEA-based matching techniques and OAEI’s participants show that aMMOEA is able to effectively determine diverse solutions for decision makers.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:34:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4ef56b428300436188970b343d06788b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-7737
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:34:37Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biology
spelling doaj.art-4ef56b428300436188970b343d06788b2023-11-23T03:53:44ZengMDPI AGBiology2079-77372021-12-011012128710.3390/biology10121287Matching Biomedical Ontologies through Adaptive Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary AlgorithmXingsi Xue0Pei-Wei Tsai1Yucheng Zhuang2Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Applications, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, ChinaDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, AustraliaIntelligent Information Processing Research Center, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, ChinaTo integrate massive amounts of heterogeneous biomedical data in biomedical ontologies and to provide more options for clinical diagnosis, this work proposes an adaptive Multi-modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (aMMOEA) to match two heterogeneous biomedical ontologies by finding the semantically identical concepts. In particular, we first propose two evaluation metrics on the alignment’s quality, which calculate the alignment’s statistical and its logical features, i.e., its f-measure and its conservativity. On this basis, we build a novel multi-objective optimization model for the biomedical ontology matching problem. By analyzing the essence of this problem, we point out that it is a large-scale Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization Problem (MMOP) with sparse Pareto optimal solutions. Then, we propose a problem-specific aMMOEA to solve this problem, which uses the Guiding Matrix (GM) to adaptively guide the algorithm’s convergence and diversity in both objective and decision spaces. The experiment uses Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI)’s biomedical tracks to test aMMOEA’s performance, and comparisons with two state-of-the-art MOEA-based matching techniques and OAEI’s participants show that aMMOEA is able to effectively determine diverse solutions for decision makers.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/12/1287biomedical ontology matchingmulti-modal multi-objective evolutionary algorithmguiding matrix
spellingShingle Xingsi Xue
Pei-Wei Tsai
Yucheng Zhuang
Matching Biomedical Ontologies through Adaptive Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm
Biology
biomedical ontology matching
multi-modal multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
guiding matrix
title Matching Biomedical Ontologies through Adaptive Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm
title_full Matching Biomedical Ontologies through Adaptive Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm
title_fullStr Matching Biomedical Ontologies through Adaptive Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Matching Biomedical Ontologies through Adaptive Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm
title_short Matching Biomedical Ontologies through Adaptive Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm
title_sort matching biomedical ontologies through adaptive multi modal multi objective evolutionary algorithm
topic biomedical ontology matching
multi-modal multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
guiding matrix
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/12/1287
work_keys_str_mv AT xingsixue matchingbiomedicalontologiesthroughadaptivemultimodalmultiobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT peiweitsai matchingbiomedicalontologiesthroughadaptivemultimodalmultiobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm
AT yuchengzhuang matchingbiomedicalontologiesthroughadaptivemultimodalmultiobjectiveevolutionaryalgorithm