Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines
This paper describes the relative frequency of reports of oil and hydraulic fluid fumes in the ventilation supply air (“fume events”) compared to other types of fumes and smoke reported by U.S. airlines over 10 years. The author reviewed and categorized 12,417 fume/smoke reports submitted to the avi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
| Series: | Aerospace |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/5/122 |
| _version_ | 1797536644215078912 |
|---|---|
| author | Judith Anderson |
| author_facet | Judith Anderson |
| author_sort | Judith Anderson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper describes the relative frequency of reports of oil and hydraulic fluid fumes in the ventilation supply air (“fume events”) compared to other types of fumes and smoke reported by U.S. airlines over 10 years. The author reviewed and categorized 12,417 fume/smoke reports submitted to the aviation regulator to comply with the primary maintenance reporting regulation (14 CFR § 121.703) from 2002–2011. The most commonly documented category of onboard fumes/smoke was electrical (37%). Combining the categories of “bleed-sourced”, “oil”, and “hydraulic fluid” created the second most prevalent category (26%). The remaining sources of onboard fumes/smoke are also reported. To put the data in context, the fume event reporting regulations are described, along with examples of ways in which certain events are underreported. These data were reported by U.S. airlines, but aviation regulations are harmonized globally, so the data likely also reflect onboard sources of fumes and smoke reported in other countries with equivalent aviation systems. The data provide insight into the relative frequency of the types of reported fumes and smoke on aircraft, which should drive design, operational, and maintenance actions to mitigate onboard exposure. The data also provide insight into how to improve current fume event reporting rules. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T12:03:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4f0782f3c5d84b15b99995dd4d6afcbc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2226-4310 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T12:03:42Z |
| publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Aerospace |
| spelling | doaj.art-4f0782f3c5d84b15b99995dd4d6afcbc2023-11-21T16:44:09ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102021-04-018512210.3390/aerospace8050122Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. AirlinesJudith Anderson0Department of Air Safety, Health, & Security, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA AFL-CIO, 501 3rd St. N.W., Washington, DC 20001, USAThis paper describes the relative frequency of reports of oil and hydraulic fluid fumes in the ventilation supply air (“fume events”) compared to other types of fumes and smoke reported by U.S. airlines over 10 years. The author reviewed and categorized 12,417 fume/smoke reports submitted to the aviation regulator to comply with the primary maintenance reporting regulation (14 CFR § 121.703) from 2002–2011. The most commonly documented category of onboard fumes/smoke was electrical (37%). Combining the categories of “bleed-sourced”, “oil”, and “hydraulic fluid” created the second most prevalent category (26%). The remaining sources of onboard fumes/smoke are also reported. To put the data in context, the fume event reporting regulations are described, along with examples of ways in which certain events are underreported. These data were reported by U.S. airlines, but aviation regulations are harmonized globally, so the data likely also reflect onboard sources of fumes and smoke reported in other countries with equivalent aviation systems. The data provide insight into the relative frequency of the types of reported fumes and smoke on aircraft, which should drive design, operational, and maintenance actions to mitigate onboard exposure. The data also provide insight into how to improve current fume event reporting rules.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/5/122aircraftfume eventreportingengine oilhydraulic fluidelectrical |
| spellingShingle | Judith Anderson Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines Aerospace aircraft fume event reporting engine oil hydraulic fluid electrical |
| title | Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines |
| title_full | Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines |
| title_fullStr | Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines |
| title_short | Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines |
| title_sort | sources of onboard fumes and smoke reported by u s airlines |
| topic | aircraft fume event reporting engine oil hydraulic fluid electrical |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/5/122 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT judithanderson sourcesofonboardfumesandsmokereportedbyusairlines |