Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running Event

This study examined the impact of congestion-related controls on runner density, flow rate, perceived safety, and satisfaction during an Australian running event. Runner congestion was compared between races organized at the Sunshine Coast Marathon and Running Festival in 2019 without controls and i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sean Peckover, Aldo Raineri, Aaron T. Scanlan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/9/132
_version_ 1797482334674485248
author Sean Peckover
Aldo Raineri
Aaron T. Scanlan
author_facet Sean Peckover
Aldo Raineri
Aaron T. Scanlan
author_sort Sean Peckover
collection DOAJ
description This study examined the impact of congestion-related controls on runner density, flow rate, perceived safety, and satisfaction during an Australian running event. Runner congestion was compared between races organized at the Sunshine Coast Marathon and Running Festival in 2019 without controls and in 2021 with added controls, including modifications to the start corral design and use of wave starts. Following a mixed-method design, runner congestion was quantitatively measured via determining runner density and flow rate in the start corrals with video analyses, while post-event surveys were used to gather qualitative evidence regarding the prevalence of congestion and its impact on runner safety and satisfaction. Descriptive analyses for quantitative data showed runner density (1.48–3.01 vs. 0.52–1.20 runners per m<sup>2</sup>) and flow rate (102–152 vs. 36–59 runners per min per m) were reduced across races with controls. Regarding qualitative data, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney rank-sum tests demonstrated a significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.01) lower prevalence of congestion was perceived on course while running, alongside a reduced (<i>p</i> = 0.08) perceived impact of congestion on event satisfaction across races with controls. Furthermore, descriptive analyses for qualitative data showed a reduced proportion of runners indicated the start corrals were “somewhat” to “extremely” (rating of at least 3 on a 5-point scale) congested upon race commencement with controls (64% vs. 75%), and perceived safety (10% vs. 17%) and satisfaction (17% vs. 30%) were “somewhat” to “extremely” impacted by congestion across races with controls. Adopting suitable start corral designs with wave starts may enable race directors to reduce runner congestion to enhance continued participation among the public and viability of their running events.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:30:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f139f21b3464467a8d127867529c719
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:30:49Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj.art-4f139f21b3464467a8d127867529c7192023-11-23T18:57:04ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632022-08-0110913210.3390/sports10090132Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running EventSean Peckover0Aldo Raineri1Aaron T. Scanlan2School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, AustraliaSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD 4000, AustraliaSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, AustraliaThis study examined the impact of congestion-related controls on runner density, flow rate, perceived safety, and satisfaction during an Australian running event. Runner congestion was compared between races organized at the Sunshine Coast Marathon and Running Festival in 2019 without controls and in 2021 with added controls, including modifications to the start corral design and use of wave starts. Following a mixed-method design, runner congestion was quantitatively measured via determining runner density and flow rate in the start corrals with video analyses, while post-event surveys were used to gather qualitative evidence regarding the prevalence of congestion and its impact on runner safety and satisfaction. Descriptive analyses for quantitative data showed runner density (1.48–3.01 vs. 0.52–1.20 runners per m<sup>2</sup>) and flow rate (102–152 vs. 36–59 runners per min per m) were reduced across races with controls. Regarding qualitative data, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney rank-sum tests demonstrated a significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.01) lower prevalence of congestion was perceived on course while running, alongside a reduced (<i>p</i> = 0.08) perceived impact of congestion on event satisfaction across races with controls. Furthermore, descriptive analyses for qualitative data showed a reduced proportion of runners indicated the start corrals were “somewhat” to “extremely” (rating of at least 3 on a 5-point scale) congested upon race commencement with controls (64% vs. 75%), and perceived safety (10% vs. 17%) and satisfaction (17% vs. 30%) were “somewhat” to “extremely” impacted by congestion across races with controls. Adopting suitable start corral designs with wave starts may enable race directors to reduce runner congestion to enhance continued participation among the public and viability of their running events.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/9/132risk managementcrowd dynamicsmass participationmarathoncrowd managementevent tourism
spellingShingle Sean Peckover
Aldo Raineri
Aaron T. Scanlan
Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running Event
Sports
risk management
crowd dynamics
mass participation
marathon
crowd management
event tourism
title Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running Event
title_full Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running Event
title_fullStr Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running Event
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running Event
title_short Implementation of Congestion-Related Controls Improves Runner Density, Flow Rate, Perceived Safety, and Satisfaction during an Australian Running Event
title_sort implementation of congestion related controls improves runner density flow rate perceived safety and satisfaction during an australian running event
topic risk management
crowd dynamics
mass participation
marathon
crowd management
event tourism
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/9/132
work_keys_str_mv AT seanpeckover implementationofcongestionrelatedcontrolsimprovesrunnerdensityflowrateperceivedsafetyandsatisfactionduringanaustralianrunningevent
AT aldoraineri implementationofcongestionrelatedcontrolsimprovesrunnerdensityflowrateperceivedsafetyandsatisfactionduringanaustralianrunningevent
AT aarontscanlan implementationofcongestionrelatedcontrolsimprovesrunnerdensityflowrateperceivedsafetyandsatisfactionduringanaustralianrunningevent