Light response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Light is one of the most critical stimuli in the majority of living organisms. In the last two decades, blue light (BL) has become a major subject of attention because of developments in light-emitting diodes (LED). The effects of BL on eukaryotic organisms and phototrophic prokaryotes have been wel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunato Kuroyanagi, Jiro Tsuchiya, Chunqi Jiang, Sayaka Mino, Hisae Kasai, Daisuke Motooka, Tetsuya Iida, Masataka Satomi, Tomoo Sawabe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1037594/full
_version_ 1828134750623105024
author Yunato Kuroyanagi
Jiro Tsuchiya
Chunqi Jiang
Sayaka Mino
Hisae Kasai
Daisuke Motooka
Tetsuya Iida
Tetsuya Iida
Tetsuya Iida
Masataka Satomi
Tomoo Sawabe
author_facet Yunato Kuroyanagi
Jiro Tsuchiya
Chunqi Jiang
Sayaka Mino
Hisae Kasai
Daisuke Motooka
Tetsuya Iida
Tetsuya Iida
Tetsuya Iida
Masataka Satomi
Tomoo Sawabe
author_sort Yunato Kuroyanagi
collection DOAJ
description Light is one of the most critical stimuli in the majority of living organisms. In the last two decades, blue light (BL) has become a major subject of attention because of developments in light-emitting diodes (LED). The effects of BL on eukaryotic organisms and phototrophic prokaryotes have been well studied, but the knowledge of its effects on non-phototrophic prokaryotes remains unclear. Since BL can penetrate seawater, it is expected that most prokaryotes living in the ocean possess molecular mechanisms which protect against BL. The aim of this study is to assess the molecular mechanisms of Vibrio parahaemolyticus cells against BL as a marine bacterial model compared to other wavelength light exposures. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses of BL-exposed cells compared to other light treated cells revealed the highest ROS fold change, the highest number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and up-regulation in the gene responsible to not only compatible solute such as glycine betaine and ectoine but also iron-sulfur biosynthesis related to ROS formation. Furthermore, red light (RL) up-regulated the expression of cryptochrome DASH, a protein known to be excited by BL, and orange light (OL) decreased the expression of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH), suggesting that OL attenuates the virulence of V. parahaemolyticus. In addition, the expression of VtrA (V. parahaemolyticus type III secretion system 2 (T3SS2) regulator A) but not VtrB (V. parahaemolyticus T3SS2 regulator B) increased under both light treatments, indicating that light exposure is unlikely to be involved in T3SS2-mediated pathogenicity. These results expand our knowledge on unique light responses in non-phototrophic marine prokaryotes.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:39:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f2a2e285cf5466ebae29818a85caa17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:39:43Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-4f2a2e285cf5466ebae29818a85caa172022-12-22T04:11:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452022-11-01910.3389/fmars.2022.10375941037594Light response of Vibrio parahaemolyticusYunato Kuroyanagi0Jiro Tsuchiya1Chunqi Jiang2Sayaka Mino3Hisae Kasai4Daisuke Motooka5Tetsuya Iida6Tetsuya Iida7Tetsuya Iida8Masataka Satomi9Tomoo Sawabe10Laboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, JapanLaboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, JapanLaboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, JapanLaboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, JapanLaboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, JapanDepartment of Infection Metagenomics, Genome Information Research Center, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, JapanDepartment of Infection Metagenomics, Genome Information Research Center, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, JapanDepartment of Bacterial Infections, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, JapanCenter for Infectious Disease Education and Research (CiDER), Osaka University, Osaka, JapanJapan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, Fisheries Technology Institute, Shizuoka, JapanLaboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, JapanLight is one of the most critical stimuli in the majority of living organisms. In the last two decades, blue light (BL) has become a major subject of attention because of developments in light-emitting diodes (LED). The effects of BL on eukaryotic organisms and phototrophic prokaryotes have been well studied, but the knowledge of its effects on non-phototrophic prokaryotes remains unclear. Since BL can penetrate seawater, it is expected that most prokaryotes living in the ocean possess molecular mechanisms which protect against BL. The aim of this study is to assess the molecular mechanisms of Vibrio parahaemolyticus cells against BL as a marine bacterial model compared to other wavelength light exposures. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses of BL-exposed cells compared to other light treated cells revealed the highest ROS fold change, the highest number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and up-regulation in the gene responsible to not only compatible solute such as glycine betaine and ectoine but also iron-sulfur biosynthesis related to ROS formation. Furthermore, red light (RL) up-regulated the expression of cryptochrome DASH, a protein known to be excited by BL, and orange light (OL) decreased the expression of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH), suggesting that OL attenuates the virulence of V. parahaemolyticus. In addition, the expression of VtrA (V. parahaemolyticus type III secretion system 2 (T3SS2) regulator A) but not VtrB (V. parahaemolyticus T3SS2 regulator B) increased under both light treatments, indicating that light exposure is unlikely to be involved in T3SS2-mediated pathogenicity. These results expand our knowledge on unique light responses in non-phototrophic marine prokaryotes.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1037594/fullblue lightvibrio parahaemolyticusROSRNA-Seqlight response
spellingShingle Yunato Kuroyanagi
Jiro Tsuchiya
Chunqi Jiang
Sayaka Mino
Hisae Kasai
Daisuke Motooka
Tetsuya Iida
Tetsuya Iida
Tetsuya Iida
Masataka Satomi
Tomoo Sawabe
Light response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Frontiers in Marine Science
blue light
vibrio parahaemolyticus
ROS
RNA-Seq
light response
title Light response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_full Light response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_fullStr Light response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_full_unstemmed Light response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_short Light response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_sort light response of vibrio parahaemolyticus
topic blue light
vibrio parahaemolyticus
ROS
RNA-Seq
light response
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1037594/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yunatokuroyanagi lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT jirotsuchiya lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT chunqijiang lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT sayakamino lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT hisaekasai lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT daisukemotooka lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT tetsuyaiida lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT tetsuyaiida lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT tetsuyaiida lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT masatakasatomi lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT tomoosawabe lightresponseofvibrioparahaemolyticus