Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study
Considering that forests are crucial in the ecosystem of our planet and that forests provide timber products as well as several ecosystem services, it is evident that the application of sustainable forest operations (SFOs) is of substantial importance to achieve sustainable forest management (SFM)....
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Land |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/388 |
_version_ | 1797446140842475520 |
---|---|
author | Rachele Venanzi Francesco Latterini Walter Stefanoni Damiano Tocci Rodolfo Picchio |
author_facet | Rachele Venanzi Francesco Latterini Walter Stefanoni Damiano Tocci Rodolfo Picchio |
author_sort | Rachele Venanzi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Considering that forests are crucial in the ecosystem of our planet and that forests provide timber products as well as several ecosystem services, it is evident that the application of sustainable forest operations (SFOs) is of substantial importance to achieve sustainable forest management (SFM). One of the most important issues to be evaluated when dealing with SFOs is limiting the disturbance and impacts related to logging. Harvesting activities can indeed alter the conditions of soil through compaction and litter removal which can also lead to modifications from the biological point of view, for example, diminishing the presence of soil microarthropods. While keeping these objectives in focus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate physico-chemical and biological impacts on forest soil in Mediterranean beech forests after forest logging with two different extraction systems, which are forestry-fitted farm tractors equipped with winch and forwarder. Specifically, authors aimed to investigate: (i) soil disturbance levels of ground-based extraction methods; (ii) soil disturbance levels of the applied forestry intervention; (iii) soil disturbance levels between winching-skidding and forwarding. Findings showed that the physical, chemical, and biological soil features were slightly disturbed by the forestry itself. In addition, forest operations and machine traffic showed clear soil disturbance, resulting in a substantial alteration of the characteristics. Between the two extraction techniques tested, winching caused less disturbance while forwarding had stronger impacts. However, it should be noted that these impact levels are found only on approximately 28% of the surface where operations were carried out. From the evidence gathered in this study, winching seems a less impactful extraction method in the studied context. On the other hand, to decrease the impact of forwarding, some technical adjustments such as bogie-tracks, as well as improved operator training, should be applied. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T13:36:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4f2c691ae35f4f7187f95eba8027b0aa |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-445X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T13:36:57Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Land |
spelling | doaj.art-4f2c691ae35f4f7187f95eba8027b0aa2023-11-30T21:11:11ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2022-03-0111338810.3390/land11030388Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case StudyRachele Venanzi0Francesco Latterini1Walter Stefanoni2Damiano Tocci3Rodolfo Picchio4Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, ItalyConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, ItalyConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, ItalyConsidering that forests are crucial in the ecosystem of our planet and that forests provide timber products as well as several ecosystem services, it is evident that the application of sustainable forest operations (SFOs) is of substantial importance to achieve sustainable forest management (SFM). One of the most important issues to be evaluated when dealing with SFOs is limiting the disturbance and impacts related to logging. Harvesting activities can indeed alter the conditions of soil through compaction and litter removal which can also lead to modifications from the biological point of view, for example, diminishing the presence of soil microarthropods. While keeping these objectives in focus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate physico-chemical and biological impacts on forest soil in Mediterranean beech forests after forest logging with two different extraction systems, which are forestry-fitted farm tractors equipped with winch and forwarder. Specifically, authors aimed to investigate: (i) soil disturbance levels of ground-based extraction methods; (ii) soil disturbance levels of the applied forestry intervention; (iii) soil disturbance levels between winching-skidding and forwarding. Findings showed that the physical, chemical, and biological soil features were slightly disturbed by the forestry itself. In addition, forest operations and machine traffic showed clear soil disturbance, resulting in a substantial alteration of the characteristics. Between the two extraction techniques tested, winching caused less disturbance while forwarding had stronger impacts. However, it should be noted that these impact levels are found only on approximately 28% of the surface where operations were carried out. From the evidence gathered in this study, winching seems a less impactful extraction method in the studied context. On the other hand, to decrease the impact of forwarding, some technical adjustments such as bogie-tracks, as well as improved operator training, should be applied.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/388sustainable forest operationssustainable forest managementQBS-ar indexwinchingforwarder |
spellingShingle | Rachele Venanzi Francesco Latterini Walter Stefanoni Damiano Tocci Rodolfo Picchio Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study Land sustainable forest operations sustainable forest management QBS-ar index winching forwarder |
title | Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study |
title_full | Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study |
title_fullStr | Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study |
title_short | Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study |
title_sort | variations of soil physico chemical and biological features after logging using two different ground based extraction methods in a beech high forest a case study |
topic | sustainable forest operations sustainable forest management QBS-ar index winching forwarder |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rachelevenanzi variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy AT francescolatterini variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy AT walterstefanoni variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy AT damianotocci variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy AT rodolfopicchio variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy |