Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study

Considering that forests are crucial in the ecosystem of our planet and that forests provide timber products as well as several ecosystem services, it is evident that the application of sustainable forest operations (SFOs) is of substantial importance to achieve sustainable forest management (SFM)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachele Venanzi, Francesco Latterini, Walter Stefanoni, Damiano Tocci, Rodolfo Picchio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/388
_version_ 1797446140842475520
author Rachele Venanzi
Francesco Latterini
Walter Stefanoni
Damiano Tocci
Rodolfo Picchio
author_facet Rachele Venanzi
Francesco Latterini
Walter Stefanoni
Damiano Tocci
Rodolfo Picchio
author_sort Rachele Venanzi
collection DOAJ
description Considering that forests are crucial in the ecosystem of our planet and that forests provide timber products as well as several ecosystem services, it is evident that the application of sustainable forest operations (SFOs) is of substantial importance to achieve sustainable forest management (SFM). One of the most important issues to be evaluated when dealing with SFOs is limiting the disturbance and impacts related to logging. Harvesting activities can indeed alter the conditions of soil through compaction and litter removal which can also lead to modifications from the biological point of view, for example, diminishing the presence of soil microarthropods. While keeping these objectives in focus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate physico-chemical and biological impacts on forest soil in Mediterranean beech forests after forest logging with two different extraction systems, which are forestry-fitted farm tractors equipped with winch and forwarder. Specifically, authors aimed to investigate: (i) soil disturbance levels of ground-based extraction methods; (ii) soil disturbance levels of the applied forestry intervention; (iii) soil disturbance levels between winching-skidding and forwarding. Findings showed that the physical, chemical, and biological soil features were slightly disturbed by the forestry itself. In addition, forest operations and machine traffic showed clear soil disturbance, resulting in a substantial alteration of the characteristics. Between the two extraction techniques tested, winching caused less disturbance while forwarding had stronger impacts. However, it should be noted that these impact levels are found only on approximately 28% of the surface where operations were carried out. From the evidence gathered in this study, winching seems a less impactful extraction method in the studied context. On the other hand, to decrease the impact of forwarding, some technical adjustments such as bogie-tracks, as well as improved operator training, should be applied.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T13:36:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f2c691ae35f4f7187f95eba8027b0aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T13:36:57Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-4f2c691ae35f4f7187f95eba8027b0aa2023-11-30T21:11:11ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2022-03-0111338810.3390/land11030388Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case StudyRachele Venanzi0Francesco Latterini1Walter Stefanoni2Damiano Tocci3Rodolfo Picchio4Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, ItalyConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, ItalyConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, ItalyConsidering that forests are crucial in the ecosystem of our planet and that forests provide timber products as well as several ecosystem services, it is evident that the application of sustainable forest operations (SFOs) is of substantial importance to achieve sustainable forest management (SFM). One of the most important issues to be evaluated when dealing with SFOs is limiting the disturbance and impacts related to logging. Harvesting activities can indeed alter the conditions of soil through compaction and litter removal which can also lead to modifications from the biological point of view, for example, diminishing the presence of soil microarthropods. While keeping these objectives in focus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate physico-chemical and biological impacts on forest soil in Mediterranean beech forests after forest logging with two different extraction systems, which are forestry-fitted farm tractors equipped with winch and forwarder. Specifically, authors aimed to investigate: (i) soil disturbance levels of ground-based extraction methods; (ii) soil disturbance levels of the applied forestry intervention; (iii) soil disturbance levels between winching-skidding and forwarding. Findings showed that the physical, chemical, and biological soil features were slightly disturbed by the forestry itself. In addition, forest operations and machine traffic showed clear soil disturbance, resulting in a substantial alteration of the characteristics. Between the two extraction techniques tested, winching caused less disturbance while forwarding had stronger impacts. However, it should be noted that these impact levels are found only on approximately 28% of the surface where operations were carried out. From the evidence gathered in this study, winching seems a less impactful extraction method in the studied context. On the other hand, to decrease the impact of forwarding, some technical adjustments such as bogie-tracks, as well as improved operator training, should be applied.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/388sustainable forest operationssustainable forest managementQBS-ar indexwinchingforwarder
spellingShingle Rachele Venanzi
Francesco Latterini
Walter Stefanoni
Damiano Tocci
Rodolfo Picchio
Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study
Land
sustainable forest operations
sustainable forest management
QBS-ar index
winching
forwarder
title Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study
title_full Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study
title_fullStr Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study
title_short Variations of Soil Physico-Chemical and Biological Features after Logging Using Two Different Ground-Based Extraction Methods in a Beech High Forest—A Case Study
title_sort variations of soil physico chemical and biological features after logging using two different ground based extraction methods in a beech high forest a case study
topic sustainable forest operations
sustainable forest management
QBS-ar index
winching
forwarder
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/388
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelevenanzi variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy
AT francescolatterini variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy
AT walterstefanoni variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy
AT damianotocci variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy
AT rodolfopicchio variationsofsoilphysicochemicalandbiologicalfeaturesafterloggingusingtwodifferentgroundbasedextractionmethodsinabeechhighforestacasestudy