Deposits’ Morphology of the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu Earthquake Mass Movements from LiDAR & Aerial Photographs

On 6 September at 03:08 a.m. local time, a 33 km deep earthquake underneath the Iburi mountains triggered more than 7000 co-seismic mass movements within 25 km of the epicenter. Most of the mass movements occurred in complex terrain and became coalescent. However, a total of 59 mass movements occurr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Gomez, Norifumi Hotta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/17/3421
_version_ 1797520877027328000
author Christopher Gomez
Norifumi Hotta
author_facet Christopher Gomez
Norifumi Hotta
author_sort Christopher Gomez
collection DOAJ
description On 6 September at 03:08 a.m. local time, a 33 km deep earthquake underneath the Iburi mountains triggered more than 7000 co-seismic mass movements within 25 km of the epicenter. Most of the mass movements occurred in complex terrain and became coalescent. However, a total of 59 mass movements occurred as discrete events and stopped on the semi-horizontal valley floor. Using this case study, the authors aimed to define planar and vertical parameters to (1) compare the geometrical parameters with rain-triggered mass movements and (2) to extend existing datasets used for hazards and disaster risk purposes. To reach these objectives, the methodology relies on LiDAR data flown in the aftermath of the earthquake as well as aerial photographs. Using a Geographical Information System (GIS), planform and vertical parameters were extracted from the DEM in order to calculate the relationship between areas and volume, between the Fahrböschung and the volume of the deposits, and to discuss the relationship between the deposit slope surface and the effective stress of the deposit. Results have shown that the relation <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>S</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>k</mi><msup><mrow><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><msub><mi>V</mi><mi>d</mi></msub></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (where <i>S</i> is the surface area of a deposit and V<sub>d</sub> the volume, and <i>k</i> a scalar that is function of S) is <i>k</i> = 2.1842ln(S) − 10.167 with a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.52, with less variability in deposits left by valley-confined processes compared to open-slope processes. The Fahrböschung for events that started as valley-confined mass-movements was Fc = −0.043ln(D) + 0.7082, with a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.5, while for open-slope mass-movements, the Fo = −0.046ln(D) + 0.7088 with a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.52. The “T-values”, as defined by Takahashi (2014), are displaying values as high as nine times that of the values for experimental rainfall debris-flow, signifying that the effective stress is higher than in rain-triggered counterparts, which have an increased pore pressure due to the need for further water in the material to be moving. For co-seismic debris-flows and other co-seismic mass movements it is the ground acceleration that “fluidizes” the material. The maxima found in this study are as high as 3.75.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:04:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f2fa5f1fbeb4cfcb834bdb86b1afd05
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:04:49Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-4f2fa5f1fbeb4cfcb834bdb86b1afd052023-11-22T11:08:38ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-08-011317342110.3390/rs13173421Deposits’ Morphology of the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu Earthquake Mass Movements from LiDAR & Aerial PhotographsChristopher Gomez0Norifumi Hotta1Laboratory of Sediment Hazards and Disaster Risk, Kobe University, Kobe 658-0022, JapanDepartment of Forest Science, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, JapanOn 6 September at 03:08 a.m. local time, a 33 km deep earthquake underneath the Iburi mountains triggered more than 7000 co-seismic mass movements within 25 km of the epicenter. Most of the mass movements occurred in complex terrain and became coalescent. However, a total of 59 mass movements occurred as discrete events and stopped on the semi-horizontal valley floor. Using this case study, the authors aimed to define planar and vertical parameters to (1) compare the geometrical parameters with rain-triggered mass movements and (2) to extend existing datasets used for hazards and disaster risk purposes. To reach these objectives, the methodology relies on LiDAR data flown in the aftermath of the earthquake as well as aerial photographs. Using a Geographical Information System (GIS), planform and vertical parameters were extracted from the DEM in order to calculate the relationship between areas and volume, between the Fahrböschung and the volume of the deposits, and to discuss the relationship between the deposit slope surface and the effective stress of the deposit. Results have shown that the relation <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>S</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>k</mi><msup><mrow><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><msub><mi>V</mi><mi>d</mi></msub></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (where <i>S</i> is the surface area of a deposit and V<sub>d</sub> the volume, and <i>k</i> a scalar that is function of S) is <i>k</i> = 2.1842ln(S) − 10.167 with a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.52, with less variability in deposits left by valley-confined processes compared to open-slope processes. The Fahrböschung for events that started as valley-confined mass-movements was Fc = −0.043ln(D) + 0.7082, with a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.5, while for open-slope mass-movements, the Fo = −0.046ln(D) + 0.7088 with a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.52. The “T-values”, as defined by Takahashi (2014), are displaying values as high as nine times that of the values for experimental rainfall debris-flow, signifying that the effective stress is higher than in rain-triggered counterparts, which have an increased pore pressure due to the need for further water in the material to be moving. For co-seismic debris-flows and other co-seismic mass movements it is the ground acceleration that “fluidizes” the material. The maxima found in this study are as high as 3.75.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/17/3421co-seismic mass movementsdebris-flowLiDARdeposit morphology
spellingShingle Christopher Gomez
Norifumi Hotta
Deposits’ Morphology of the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu Earthquake Mass Movements from LiDAR & Aerial Photographs
Remote Sensing
co-seismic mass movements
debris-flow
LiDAR
deposit morphology
title Deposits’ Morphology of the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu Earthquake Mass Movements from LiDAR & Aerial Photographs
title_full Deposits’ Morphology of the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu Earthquake Mass Movements from LiDAR & Aerial Photographs
title_fullStr Deposits’ Morphology of the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu Earthquake Mass Movements from LiDAR & Aerial Photographs
title_full_unstemmed Deposits’ Morphology of the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu Earthquake Mass Movements from LiDAR & Aerial Photographs
title_short Deposits’ Morphology of the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu Earthquake Mass Movements from LiDAR & Aerial Photographs
title_sort deposits morphology of the 2018 hokkaido iburi tobu earthquake mass movements from lidar aerial photographs
topic co-seismic mass movements
debris-flow
LiDAR
deposit morphology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/17/3421
work_keys_str_mv AT christophergomez depositsmorphologyofthe2018hokkaidoiburitobuearthquakemassmovementsfromlidaraerialphotographs
AT norifumihotta depositsmorphologyofthe2018hokkaidoiburitobuearthquakemassmovementsfromlidaraerialphotographs