<i>Contempt for the Whos?</i> or: How to Read Nietzsche Autobiographically after the Death of the <i>Bios</i>

This paper examines French philosopher Sarah Kofman’s fractured relationships to her identities as Jew and woman. Active participant in postwar debates surrounding deconstruction and psychoanalysis, acclaimed reader of Freud and Nietzsche, and interlocutor of Derrida, Kofman is today most widely rem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joel Swanson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/205
_version_ 1797442835303104512
author Joel Swanson
author_facet Joel Swanson
author_sort Joel Swanson
collection DOAJ
description This paper examines French philosopher Sarah Kofman’s fractured relationships to her identities as Jew and woman. Active participant in postwar debates surrounding deconstruction and psychoanalysis, acclaimed reader of Freud and Nietzsche, and interlocutor of Derrida, Kofman is today most widely remembered for her autobiographical writings about her childhood as a young Orthodox Jewish girl during the Nazi occupation of Paris. Kofman’s mother sent her to pretend to be the daughter of a Christian woman, which both ensured Kofman’s physical survival and led to an uncanny Freudian doubling of the maternal figure, such that both “Jew” and “Christian” became unstable, mimetic identity categories which Kofman could never again fully inhabit. The paper examines Kofman’s writings on Nietzsche, suggesting that her attempt to absolve the German philosopher of the charges of antisemitism oft leveled against him functioned as a similarly failed and incomplete means of asserting control over her personal identity. If Kofman could demonstrate that Nietzsche was not in fact an antisemite, then she could write herself into the lineage of Continental philosophy and reclaim the stable ancestry she lost during the war. Yet the paper concludes that a counter-narrative running throughout Kofman’s writings suggests an awareness that she could never fully absolve Nietzsche, and therefore that her attempt to claim Nietzsche as a father figure would always fail. The paper thus suggests that the illusion of control and stability epitomized by Kofman’s reading of Nietzsche provides an interpretive thematic to understand the unstable figure of the post-Holocaust Jewish philosopher.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:47:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f30d850abb448e9882ad48aac6b2ba2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:47:55Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-4f30d850abb448e9882ad48aac6b2ba22023-11-30T22:09:45ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442022-02-0113320510.3390/rel13030205<i>Contempt for the Whos?</i> or: How to Read Nietzsche Autobiographically after the Death of the <i>Bios</i>Joel Swanson0The University of Chicago Divinity School, Swift Hall, 1025 E. 58th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USAThis paper examines French philosopher Sarah Kofman’s fractured relationships to her identities as Jew and woman. Active participant in postwar debates surrounding deconstruction and psychoanalysis, acclaimed reader of Freud and Nietzsche, and interlocutor of Derrida, Kofman is today most widely remembered for her autobiographical writings about her childhood as a young Orthodox Jewish girl during the Nazi occupation of Paris. Kofman’s mother sent her to pretend to be the daughter of a Christian woman, which both ensured Kofman’s physical survival and led to an uncanny Freudian doubling of the maternal figure, such that both “Jew” and “Christian” became unstable, mimetic identity categories which Kofman could never again fully inhabit. The paper examines Kofman’s writings on Nietzsche, suggesting that her attempt to absolve the German philosopher of the charges of antisemitism oft leveled against him functioned as a similarly failed and incomplete means of asserting control over her personal identity. If Kofman could demonstrate that Nietzsche was not in fact an antisemite, then she could write herself into the lineage of Continental philosophy and reclaim the stable ancestry she lost during the war. Yet the paper concludes that a counter-narrative running throughout Kofman’s writings suggests an awareness that she could never fully absolve Nietzsche, and therefore that her attempt to claim Nietzsche as a father figure would always fail. The paper thus suggests that the illusion of control and stability epitomized by Kofman’s reading of Nietzsche provides an interpretive thematic to understand the unstable figure of the post-Holocaust Jewish philosopher.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/205HolocaustNietzscheFreudpsychoanalysismodern Jewish thoughtFrance
spellingShingle Joel Swanson
<i>Contempt for the Whos?</i> or: How to Read Nietzsche Autobiographically after the Death of the <i>Bios</i>
Religions
Holocaust
Nietzsche
Freud
psychoanalysis
modern Jewish thought
France
title <i>Contempt for the Whos?</i> or: How to Read Nietzsche Autobiographically after the Death of the <i>Bios</i>
title_full <i>Contempt for the Whos?</i> or: How to Read Nietzsche Autobiographically after the Death of the <i>Bios</i>
title_fullStr <i>Contempt for the Whos?</i> or: How to Read Nietzsche Autobiographically after the Death of the <i>Bios</i>
title_full_unstemmed <i>Contempt for the Whos?</i> or: How to Read Nietzsche Autobiographically after the Death of the <i>Bios</i>
title_short <i>Contempt for the Whos?</i> or: How to Read Nietzsche Autobiographically after the Death of the <i>Bios</i>
title_sort i contempt for the whos i or how to read nietzsche autobiographically after the death of the i bios i
topic Holocaust
Nietzsche
Freud
psychoanalysis
modern Jewish thought
France
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/205
work_keys_str_mv AT joelswanson icontemptforthewhosiorhowtoreadnietzscheautobiographicallyafterthedeathoftheibiosi