Assessing the completeness and comparability of outcomes in systematic reviews addressing food security: protocol for a methodological study
Abstract Background Systematic reviews should specify all outcomes at the protocol stage. Pre-specification helps prevent outcome choice from being influenced by knowledge of included study results. Completely specified outcomes comprise five elements: (1) domain (title), (2) specific measurement (t...
Main Authors: | Solange Durão, Marianne Visser, Tamara Kredo, Ian J. Saldanha |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1268-1 |
Similar Items
-
The Campbell Collaboration’s systematic review of school-based anti-bullying interventions does not meet mandatory methodological standards
by: Julia H. Littell, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry
by: Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
An investigation of methods to improve recall for the patient-reported outcome measurement in COPD patients: a pilot randomised control trial and feasibility study protocol
by: Sheree M. S. Smith, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Outcome pre-specification requires sufficient detail to guard against outcome switching in clinical trials: a case study
by: Brennan C. Kahan, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
by: Maximilian Siebert, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)