Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and Expectations

Objective To evaluate undergraduate biomedical education student opinions and expectations on mentorship. Methods A survey was administered to students enrolled in the undergraduate biology, neuroscience and nursing programs at a large public research-intensive university. The survey queried demogra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bradley C. Wright, Aric D. Schadler, Hollie I. Swanson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205221096101
_version_ 1818261873905106944
author Bradley C. Wright
Aric D. Schadler
Hollie I. Swanson
author_facet Bradley C. Wright
Aric D. Schadler
Hollie I. Swanson
author_sort Bradley C. Wright
collection DOAJ
description Objective To evaluate undergraduate biomedical education student opinions and expectations on mentorship. Methods A survey was administered to students enrolled in the undergraduate biology, neuroscience and nursing programs at a large public research-intensive university. The survey queried demographics, previous mentorship experiences, ideal qualities of mentors, benefits/value of mentorship and future plans for seeking mentorship. Survey responses were evaluated using either t-test comparisons or one-way ANOVA. Results The majority of the respondents were female and were interested in pursuing professional schools (nursing and medicine). Survey results indicate high student interest in receiving mentoring, but few were active participants in a mentoring relationship. Respondents indicated either lack of knowledge or discomfort in identifying a mentor. While faculty mentors versus peer mentors were preferred, respondents indicated that mentoring by either faculty or peers would be of value. Survey results indicate that desired benefits of mentoring included guidance in future education and career decisions, networking and career advice. Conclusion The major conclusions are that despite high student interest in being mentored, their participation in mentoring is very low. These finding are supportive of the development of structured mentoring programs to facilitate and enhance mentoring of undergraduate STEM students and aid in their academic career progression.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T18:54:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f49c212ced14758a847e8e443bb1d56
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2382-1205
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T18:54:09Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
spelling doaj.art-4f49c212ced14758a847e8e443bb1d562022-12-22T00:15:17ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Medical Education and Curricular Development2382-12052022-04-01910.1177/23821205221096101Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and ExpectationsBradley C. Wright0Aric D. Schadler1Hollie I. Swanson2 Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA Pediatrics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USAObjective To evaluate undergraduate biomedical education student opinions and expectations on mentorship. Methods A survey was administered to students enrolled in the undergraduate biology, neuroscience and nursing programs at a large public research-intensive university. The survey queried demographics, previous mentorship experiences, ideal qualities of mentors, benefits/value of mentorship and future plans for seeking mentorship. Survey responses were evaluated using either t-test comparisons or one-way ANOVA. Results The majority of the respondents were female and were interested in pursuing professional schools (nursing and medicine). Survey results indicate high student interest in receiving mentoring, but few were active participants in a mentoring relationship. Respondents indicated either lack of knowledge or discomfort in identifying a mentor. While faculty mentors versus peer mentors were preferred, respondents indicated that mentoring by either faculty or peers would be of value. Survey results indicate that desired benefits of mentoring included guidance in future education and career decisions, networking and career advice. Conclusion The major conclusions are that despite high student interest in being mentored, their participation in mentoring is very low. These finding are supportive of the development of structured mentoring programs to facilitate and enhance mentoring of undergraduate STEM students and aid in their academic career progression.https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205221096101
spellingShingle Bradley C. Wright
Aric D. Schadler
Hollie I. Swanson
Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and Expectations
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
title Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and Expectations
title_full Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and Expectations
title_fullStr Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and Expectations
title_full_unstemmed Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and Expectations
title_short Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and Expectations
title_sort mentorship in undergraduate biomedical education identifying student opinions and expectations
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205221096101
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleycwright mentorshipinundergraduatebiomedicaleducationidentifyingstudentopinionsandexpectations
AT aricdschadler mentorshipinundergraduatebiomedicaleducationidentifyingstudentopinionsandexpectations
AT hollieiswanson mentorshipinundergraduatebiomedicaleducationidentifyingstudentopinionsandexpectations