MARKETS AND EQUALITY: REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE TERM ‘MARKETS’ AND A CRITIQUE OF DWORKIN’S EQUALITY OF RESOURCES
The article has two goals. Firstly, it tries to discern the meanings in which the word “market” is employed, sometimes as the lack of legal impediments to the freedom of contract, sometimes as relationships susceptible to supply and demand variations, sometimes as lack of coordination and sometimes,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/22398 |
_version_ | 1819225341536763904 |
---|---|
author | Leandro Martins Zanitelli |
author_facet | Leandro Martins Zanitelli |
author_sort | Leandro Martins Zanitelli |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The article has two goals. Firstly, it tries to discern the meanings in which the word “market” is employed, sometimes as the lack of legal impediments to the freedom of contract, sometimes as relationships susceptible to supply and demand variations, sometimes as lack of coordination and sometimes, finally, as a “place” to the fulfillment of preferences. The second goal is to show how a disregard of these several meanings may truncate normative arguments about markets. To this end, the paper assesses Dworkin’s argument on the inescapability of markets for attaining equality of resources. It is argued that this argument is problematic in that, although drawing on the market being understood as a “place” for preferences satisfaction, it assumes, in a general way, that such desideratum could be achieved simply through the abolition of legal constraints to transactional freedom. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T10:08:03Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4f515a42893a42c6a96502abecbfe0a6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1981-3694 1981-3694 |
language | Portuguese |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T10:08:03Z |
publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM |
spelling | doaj.art-4f515a42893a42c6a96502abecbfe0a62022-12-21T17:51:02ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaRevista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM1981-36941981-36942016-12-0111393195110.5902/198136942239812241MARKETS AND EQUALITY: REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE TERM ‘MARKETS’ AND A CRITIQUE OF DWORKIN’S EQUALITY OF RESOURCESLeandro Martins Zanitelli0Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)The article has two goals. Firstly, it tries to discern the meanings in which the word “market” is employed, sometimes as the lack of legal impediments to the freedom of contract, sometimes as relationships susceptible to supply and demand variations, sometimes as lack of coordination and sometimes, finally, as a “place” to the fulfillment of preferences. The second goal is to show how a disregard of these several meanings may truncate normative arguments about markets. To this end, the paper assesses Dworkin’s argument on the inescapability of markets for attaining equality of resources. It is argued that this argument is problematic in that, although drawing on the market being understood as a “place” for preferences satisfaction, it assumes, in a general way, that such desideratum could be achieved simply through the abolition of legal constraints to transactional freedom.https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/22398dworkinigualitarismomercado. |
spellingShingle | Leandro Martins Zanitelli MARKETS AND EQUALITY: REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE TERM ‘MARKETS’ AND A CRITIQUE OF DWORKIN’S EQUALITY OF RESOURCES Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM dworkin igualitarismo mercado. |
title | MARKETS AND EQUALITY: REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE TERM ‘MARKETS’ AND A CRITIQUE OF DWORKIN’S EQUALITY OF RESOURCES |
title_full | MARKETS AND EQUALITY: REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE TERM ‘MARKETS’ AND A CRITIQUE OF DWORKIN’S EQUALITY OF RESOURCES |
title_fullStr | MARKETS AND EQUALITY: REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE TERM ‘MARKETS’ AND A CRITIQUE OF DWORKIN’S EQUALITY OF RESOURCES |
title_full_unstemmed | MARKETS AND EQUALITY: REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE TERM ‘MARKETS’ AND A CRITIQUE OF DWORKIN’S EQUALITY OF RESOURCES |
title_short | MARKETS AND EQUALITY: REMARKS ON THE USE OF THE TERM ‘MARKETS’ AND A CRITIQUE OF DWORKIN’S EQUALITY OF RESOURCES |
title_sort | markets and equality remarks on the use of the term markets and a critique of dworkin s equality of resources |
topic | dworkin igualitarismo mercado. |
url | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/22398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leandromartinszanitelli marketsandequalityremarksontheuseofthetermmarketsandacritiqueofdworkinsequalityofresources |