Spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment. A systematic review

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global major health concern. Spatial analysis is considered an invaluable method in health studies. Therefore, we explored the usage of spatial analysis in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in studies on AMR in the environment. This systematic review is based...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Spets, Karin Ebert, Patrik Dinnétz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2023-05-01
Series:Geospatial Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://geospatialhealth.net/index.php/gh/article/view/1168
_version_ 1797820092322414592
author Patrick Spets
Karin Ebert
Patrik Dinnétz
author_facet Patrick Spets
Karin Ebert
Patrik Dinnétz
author_sort Patrick Spets
collection DOAJ
description Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global major health concern. Spatial analysis is considered an invaluable method in health studies. Therefore, we explored the usage of spatial analysis in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in studies on AMR in the environment. This systematic review is based on database searches, a content analysis, ranking of the included studies according to the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) and estimation of data points per km2. Initial database searches resulted in 524 records after removal of duplicates. After the last stage of full text screening, 13 greatly heterogeneous articles with diverse study origins, methods and design remained. In the majority of studies, the data density was considerably less than one sampling site per km2 but exceeded 1,000 sites per km2 in one study. The results of the content analysis and ranking showed a variation between studies that primarily used spatial analysis and those that used spatial analysis as a sec ondary method. We identified two distinct groups of GIS methods. The first was focused on sample collection and laboratory testing, with GIS as supporting method. The second group used overlay analysis as the primary method to combine datasets in a map. In one case, both methods were combined. The low number of articles that met our inclusion criteria highlights a research gap. Based on the findings of this study we encourage application of GIS to its full potential in studies of AMR in the environment.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:33:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f5357fae8774ad5b39104aea47bf79e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1827-1987
1970-7096
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:33:18Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format Article
series Geospatial Health
spelling doaj.art-4f5357fae8774ad5b39104aea47bf79e2023-05-25T18:21:15ZengPAGEPress PublicationsGeospatial Health1827-19871970-70962023-05-0118110.4081/gh.2023.1168Spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment. A systematic reviewPatrick Spets0Karin Ebert1Patrik Dinnétz2Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Södertörn University, HuddingeNatural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Södertörn University, HuddingeNatural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Södertörn University, Huddinge Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global major health concern. Spatial analysis is considered an invaluable method in health studies. Therefore, we explored the usage of spatial analysis in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in studies on AMR in the environment. This systematic review is based on database searches, a content analysis, ranking of the included studies according to the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) and estimation of data points per km2. Initial database searches resulted in 524 records after removal of duplicates. After the last stage of full text screening, 13 greatly heterogeneous articles with diverse study origins, methods and design remained. In the majority of studies, the data density was considerably less than one sampling site per km2 but exceeded 1,000 sites per km2 in one study. The results of the content analysis and ranking showed a variation between studies that primarily used spatial analysis and those that used spatial analysis as a sec ondary method. We identified two distinct groups of GIS methods. The first was focused on sample collection and laboratory testing, with GIS as supporting method. The second group used overlay analysis as the primary method to combine datasets in a map. In one case, both methods were combined. The low number of articles that met our inclusion criteria highlights a research gap. Based on the findings of this study we encourage application of GIS to its full potential in studies of AMR in the environment. https://geospatialhealth.net/index.php/gh/article/view/1168antibiotic resistancespatial methodsGISland usenatural environment
spellingShingle Patrick Spets
Karin Ebert
Patrik Dinnétz
Spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment. A systematic review
Geospatial Health
antibiotic resistance
spatial methods
GIS
land use
natural environment
title Spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment. A systematic review
title_full Spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment. A systematic review
title_fullStr Spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment. A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment. A systematic review
title_short Spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment. A systematic review
title_sort spatial analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the environment a systematic review
topic antibiotic resistance
spatial methods
GIS
land use
natural environment
url https://geospatialhealth.net/index.php/gh/article/view/1168
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickspets spatialanalysisofantimicrobialresistanceintheenvironmentasystematicreview
AT karinebert spatialanalysisofantimicrobialresistanceintheenvironmentasystematicreview
AT patrikdinnetz spatialanalysisofantimicrobialresistanceintheenvironmentasystematicreview