Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene

ABSTRACTAlthough A-to-I RNA editing leads to similar effects to A-to-G DNA mutation, nonsynonymous RNA editing (recoding) is believed to confer its adaptiveness by ‘epigenetically’ regulating proteomic diversity in a temporospatial manner, avoiding the pleiotropic effect of genomic mutations. Recent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caiqing Zheng, Ling Ma, Fan Song, Li Tian, Wanzhi Cai, Hu Li, Yuange Duan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Epigenetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15592294.2024.2333665
_version_ 1797246515849199616
author Caiqing Zheng
Ling Ma
Fan Song
Li Tian
Wanzhi Cai
Hu Li
Yuange Duan
author_facet Caiqing Zheng
Ling Ma
Fan Song
Li Tian
Wanzhi Cai
Hu Li
Yuange Duan
author_sort Caiqing Zheng
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTAlthough A-to-I RNA editing leads to similar effects to A-to-G DNA mutation, nonsynonymous RNA editing (recoding) is believed to confer its adaptiveness by ‘epigenetically’ regulating proteomic diversity in a temporospatial manner, avoiding the pleiotropic effect of genomic mutations. Recent discoveries on the evolutionary trajectory of Ser>Gly auto-editing site in insect Adar gene demonstrated a selective advantage to having an editable codon compared to uneditable ones. However, apart from pure observations, quantitative approaches for justifying the adaptiveness of individual RNA editing sites are still lacking. We performed a comparative genomic analysis on 113 Diptera species, focusing on the Adar Ser>Gly auto-recoding site in Drosophila. We only found one species having a derived Gly at the corresponding site, and this occurrence was significantly lower than genome-wide random expectation. This suggests that the Adar Ser>Gly site is unlikely to be genomically replaced with G during evolution, and thus indicating the advantage of editable status over hardwired genomic alleles. Similar trends were observed for the conserved Ile>Met recoding in gene Syt1. In the light of evolution, we established a comparative genomic approach for quantitatively justifying the adaptiveness of individual editing sites. Priority should be given to such adaptive editing sites in future functional studies.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:44:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f62541ee74746aca6b2c23f44fab110
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1559-2294
1559-2308
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:44:02Z
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Epigenetics
spelling doaj.art-4f62541ee74746aca6b2c23f44fab1102024-03-25T09:54:20ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEpigenetics1559-22941559-23082024-12-0119110.1080/15592294.2024.2333665Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar geneCaiqing Zheng0Ling Ma1Fan Song2Li Tian3Wanzhi Cai4Hu Li5Yuange Duan6Department of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaABSTRACTAlthough A-to-I RNA editing leads to similar effects to A-to-G DNA mutation, nonsynonymous RNA editing (recoding) is believed to confer its adaptiveness by ‘epigenetically’ regulating proteomic diversity in a temporospatial manner, avoiding the pleiotropic effect of genomic mutations. Recent discoveries on the evolutionary trajectory of Ser>Gly auto-editing site in insect Adar gene demonstrated a selective advantage to having an editable codon compared to uneditable ones. However, apart from pure observations, quantitative approaches for justifying the adaptiveness of individual RNA editing sites are still lacking. We performed a comparative genomic analysis on 113 Diptera species, focusing on the Adar Ser>Gly auto-recoding site in Drosophila. We only found one species having a derived Gly at the corresponding site, and this occurrence was significantly lower than genome-wide random expectation. This suggests that the Adar Ser>Gly site is unlikely to be genomically replaced with G during evolution, and thus indicating the advantage of editable status over hardwired genomic alleles. Similar trends were observed for the conserved Ile>Met recoding in gene Syt1. In the light of evolution, we established a comparative genomic approach for quantitatively justifying the adaptiveness of individual editing sites. Priority should be given to such adaptive editing sites in future functional studies.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15592294.2024.2333665A-to-I RNA editingAdarSer>Gly auto-recodinginsectDrosophilaadaptive
spellingShingle Caiqing Zheng
Ling Ma
Fan Song
Li Tian
Wanzhi Cai
Hu Li
Yuange Duan
Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene
Epigenetics
A-to-I RNA editing
Adar
Ser>Gly auto-recoding
insect
Drosophila
adaptive
title Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene
title_full Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene
title_fullStr Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene
title_full_unstemmed Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene
title_short Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene
title_sort comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive a to i rna editing in insect adar gene
topic A-to-I RNA editing
Adar
Ser>Gly auto-recoding
insect
Drosophila
adaptive
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15592294.2024.2333665
work_keys_str_mv AT caiqingzheng comparativegenomicanalysesrevealevidenceforadaptiveatoirnaeditingininsectadargene
AT lingma comparativegenomicanalysesrevealevidenceforadaptiveatoirnaeditingininsectadargene
AT fansong comparativegenomicanalysesrevealevidenceforadaptiveatoirnaeditingininsectadargene
AT litian comparativegenomicanalysesrevealevidenceforadaptiveatoirnaeditingininsectadargene
AT wanzhicai comparativegenomicanalysesrevealevidenceforadaptiveatoirnaeditingininsectadargene
AT huli comparativegenomicanalysesrevealevidenceforadaptiveatoirnaeditingininsectadargene
AT yuangeduan comparativegenomicanalysesrevealevidenceforadaptiveatoirnaeditingininsectadargene