Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance

Abstract Background Morgan and Scheiman’s Optometric Extension Program (OEP) expected binocular vision findings have longstanding use in optometry. With technological advances, the demands and standards of binocular function have changed. This study aimed to investigate which binocular visual functi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shyan-Tarng Chen, Kuo-Chen Su, Po-Hsin Wang, Xiang-Yin Zhong, Ching-Ying Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02731-1
_version_ 1811171815109689344
author Shyan-Tarng Chen
Kuo-Chen Su
Po-Hsin Wang
Xiang-Yin Zhong
Ching-Ying Cheng
author_facet Shyan-Tarng Chen
Kuo-Chen Su
Po-Hsin Wang
Xiang-Yin Zhong
Ching-Ying Cheng
author_sort Shyan-Tarng Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Morgan and Scheiman’s Optometric Extension Program (OEP) expected binocular vision findings have longstanding use in optometry. With technological advances, the demands and standards of binocular function have changed. This study aimed to investigate which binocular visual functions can effectively predict visual behavior performance. Methods Participants aged 15–24 years were recruited from two colleges and two universities. After completing the CSMU-Visual Behavioral Performance questionnaire (CSMU-VBP, with four components: near work, visual perception, visual comfort, and whole-body balance), participants were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups based on questionnaire findings (cutoff: < 12 vs. ≥ 12 symptoms). Then a 24-step binocular visual examination was undertaken. Data were analyzed with one-sample, Student’s, and paired t-tests. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the predictors of binocular visual function required for near work, visual perception, visual comfort, and body balance dimensions. Results Among 308 participants, 43 (14%) and 265 (86%) were symptomatic and asymptomatic, respectively. Among the 46 participants with abnormal binocular vision, 36 (78%) reported that they had no obvious symptoms. The commonest dysfunctions were accommodative excess and convergence excess. Most of the binocular visual findings significantly diverged from traditional normal values: amplitude of accommodation, as well as base-in prism to break and recovery points at distance were higher than traditional normal values, whereas others were lower than traditional normal values. Total CSMU-VBP scores indicated that the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups had significant differences in DBO recovery (t = 2.334, p = 0.020) and BAF (t = 1.984, p = 0.048). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded the following binocular visual functional cutoff points: near work (DBO blur < 7, DBO recovery < 5.5), visual perception (MAF < 10.5, BAF < 10.25), visual comfort (DLP <  − 2.25, DBI break > 11.5, NBI blur > 15, NBI break > 17.5, NBI recovery > 13, NPC < 5.75), and body balance (NFD_H >  − 0.5, gradient AC/A [minus] > 2.25, NPC < 4.75). Conclusions The mean values of binocular visual function among young Taiwanese adults were statistically different from traditional normative values. Further research is required to confirm whether these findings reflect impaired binocular vision or stringent criteria. Assessments of binocular visual function, especially binocular accommodation sensitivity, are crucial in routine optometric examination.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:20:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f65749ebe6a4c5a97ffe7aaa69d7cb1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2415
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:20:26Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-4f65749ebe6a4c5a97ffe7aaa69d7cb12023-02-05T12:07:17ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152023-02-0123111310.1186/s12886-022-02731-1Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performanceShyan-Tarng Chen0Kuo-Chen Su1Po-Hsin Wang2Xiang-Yin Zhong3Ching-Ying Cheng4Department of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical UniversityDepartment of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical UniversityDepartment of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical UniversityDepartment of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical UniversityDepartment of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical UniversityAbstract Background Morgan and Scheiman’s Optometric Extension Program (OEP) expected binocular vision findings have longstanding use in optometry. With technological advances, the demands and standards of binocular function have changed. This study aimed to investigate which binocular visual functions can effectively predict visual behavior performance. Methods Participants aged 15–24 years were recruited from two colleges and two universities. After completing the CSMU-Visual Behavioral Performance questionnaire (CSMU-VBP, with four components: near work, visual perception, visual comfort, and whole-body balance), participants were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups based on questionnaire findings (cutoff: < 12 vs. ≥ 12 symptoms). Then a 24-step binocular visual examination was undertaken. Data were analyzed with one-sample, Student’s, and paired t-tests. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the predictors of binocular visual function required for near work, visual perception, visual comfort, and body balance dimensions. Results Among 308 participants, 43 (14%) and 265 (86%) were symptomatic and asymptomatic, respectively. Among the 46 participants with abnormal binocular vision, 36 (78%) reported that they had no obvious symptoms. The commonest dysfunctions were accommodative excess and convergence excess. Most of the binocular visual findings significantly diverged from traditional normal values: amplitude of accommodation, as well as base-in prism to break and recovery points at distance were higher than traditional normal values, whereas others were lower than traditional normal values. Total CSMU-VBP scores indicated that the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups had significant differences in DBO recovery (t = 2.334, p = 0.020) and BAF (t = 1.984, p = 0.048). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded the following binocular visual functional cutoff points: near work (DBO blur < 7, DBO recovery < 5.5), visual perception (MAF < 10.5, BAF < 10.25), visual comfort (DLP <  − 2.25, DBI break > 11.5, NBI blur > 15, NBI break > 17.5, NBI recovery > 13, NPC < 5.75), and body balance (NFD_H >  − 0.5, gradient AC/A [minus] > 2.25, NPC < 4.75). Conclusions The mean values of binocular visual function among young Taiwanese adults were statistically different from traditional normative values. Further research is required to confirm whether these findings reflect impaired binocular vision or stringent criteria. Assessments of binocular visual function, especially binocular accommodation sensitivity, are crucial in routine optometric examination.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02731-1Binocular visual functionBinocular accommodative examinationVisual behavior performance
spellingShingle Shyan-Tarng Chen
Kuo-Chen Su
Po-Hsin Wang
Xiang-Yin Zhong
Ching-Ying Cheng
Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance
BMC Ophthalmology
Binocular visual function
Binocular accommodative examination
Visual behavior performance
title Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance
title_full Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance
title_fullStr Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance
title_full_unstemmed Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance
title_short Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance
title_sort routine binocular examination of young taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance
topic Binocular visual function
Binocular accommodative examination
Visual behavior performance
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02731-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shyantarngchen routinebinocularexaminationofyoungtaiwaneseadultsasapredictorofvisualbehaviorperformance
AT kuochensu routinebinocularexaminationofyoungtaiwaneseadultsasapredictorofvisualbehaviorperformance
AT pohsinwang routinebinocularexaminationofyoungtaiwaneseadultsasapredictorofvisualbehaviorperformance
AT xiangyinzhong routinebinocularexaminationofyoungtaiwaneseadultsasapredictorofvisualbehaviorperformance
AT chingyingcheng routinebinocularexaminationofyoungtaiwaneseadultsasapredictorofvisualbehaviorperformance