Microstructure and Nanoindentation Behavior of Ti<sub>40</sub>Zr<sub>40</sub>Ni<sub>20</sub> Quasicrystal Alloy by Casting and Rapid Solidification

A Ti<sub>40</sub>Zr<sub>40</sub>Ni<sub>20</sub> quasicrystal (QCs) rod and ribbons were prepared by conventional casting and rapid solidification. The X-ray diffractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junli Hou, Zhong Yang, Hongbo Duan, Yiyi Feng, Yongchun Guo, Jianping Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Metals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/11/10/1563
Description
Summary:A Ti<sub>40</sub>Zr<sub>40</sub>Ni<sub>20</sub> quasicrystal (QCs) rod and ribbons were prepared by conventional casting and rapid solidification. The X-ray diffractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) techniques were used to investigate the microtissue, phase composition, and solidification features of the samples; the nano-indentation test was carried out at room temperature. The results show that a mixture of the α-Ti(Zr) phase and the icosahedral quasicrystal (I-phase) was formed in the Ti<sub>40</sub>Zr<sub>40</sub>Ni<sub>20</sub> rod; the microstructure of Ti<sub>40</sub>Zr<sub>40</sub>Ni<sub>20</sub> ribbons mainly consisted of the I-phase. The solidification mechanism of the I-phase was different in the two alloys. The I-phase in the quasicrystalline rod was formed by packet reaction while in the ribbons it was generated directly from the liquid. At room temperature, both samples had relatively high hardness and elastic modulus; the elastic modulus of the ribbons is 76 GPa, higher than the 45 GPa of the rod. The hardness of the ribbons was more than twice that of the rod.
ISSN:2075-4701