Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India

ABSTRACTIntegrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. K. Nayak, Rahul Tripathi, B. Dhal, A. D. Nayak, S. Vijayakumar, B. Satpathy, D. Chatterjee, C. K. Swain, K. C. Moharana, P. K. Nayak, Annie Poonam, Sangita Mohanty, M. Shahid, Anjani Kumar, B. Mondal, B. B. Panda, A. K. Patra, S. K. Swain, H. Pathak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250
_version_ 1797648019973210112
author A. K. Nayak
Rahul Tripathi
B. Dhal
A. D. Nayak
S. Vijayakumar
B. Satpathy
D. Chatterjee
C. K. Swain
K. C. Moharana
P. K. Nayak
Annie Poonam
Sangita Mohanty
M. Shahid
Anjani Kumar
B. Mondal
B. B. Panda
A. K. Patra
S. K. Swain
H. Pathak
author_facet A. K. Nayak
Rahul Tripathi
B. Dhal
A. D. Nayak
S. Vijayakumar
B. Satpathy
D. Chatterjee
C. K. Swain
K. C. Moharana
P. K. Nayak
Annie Poonam
Sangita Mohanty
M. Shahid
Anjani Kumar
B. Mondal
B. B. Panda
A. K. Patra
S. K. Swain
H. Pathak
author_sort A. K. Nayak
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTIntegrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their environment impact, eco-efficiency and technical efficiency (TE). The households, which own these IFS, were grouped into four major categories based on farm size viz., marginal (<0.8 ha), small (0.8–1.2 ha), medium (1.2–2.0 ha) and large (>2.0 ha). Among the farm size category, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded for marginal farms, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed for small farms. The highest eco-efficiency was recorded for farm having five enterprises (INR195 kg CO2eq. ha−1) followed by four enterprises (INR190 kg CO2eq.ha−1). Among the enterprises, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded in fruits, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed in dairy. The TE scores estimated using stochastic frontier analysis decreased with increasing farm size and the highest TE score was recorded for marginal farms, whereas medium and large farms recorded the lowest TE scores. The findings indicated the necessity for imparting training and demonstrations and funding support as well as subsidy for larger adoption of IFS to reap higher returns.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:25:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f73183c9bdd4faf9b122c4472125cdc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1473-5903
1747-762X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:25:04Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
spelling doaj.art-4f73183c9bdd4faf9b122c4472125cdc2023-10-27T19:30:36ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability1473-59031747-762X2023-12-0121110.1080/14735903.2023.2270250Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern IndiaA. K. Nayak0Rahul Tripathi1B. Dhal2A. D. Nayak3S. Vijayakumar4B. Satpathy5D. Chatterjee6C. K. Swain7K. C. Moharana8P. K. Nayak9Annie Poonam10Sangita Mohanty11M. Shahid12Anjani Kumar13B. Mondal14B. B. Panda15A. K. Patra16S. K. Swain17H. Pathak18Crop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaOrissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, IndiaOrissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaABSTRACTIntegrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their environment impact, eco-efficiency and technical efficiency (TE). The households, which own these IFS, were grouped into four major categories based on farm size viz., marginal (<0.8 ha), small (0.8–1.2 ha), medium (1.2–2.0 ha) and large (>2.0 ha). Among the farm size category, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded for marginal farms, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed for small farms. The highest eco-efficiency was recorded for farm having five enterprises (INR195 kg CO2eq. ha−1) followed by four enterprises (INR190 kg CO2eq.ha−1). Among the enterprises, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded in fruits, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed in dairy. The TE scores estimated using stochastic frontier analysis decreased with increasing farm size and the highest TE score was recorded for marginal farms, whereas medium and large farms recorded the lowest TE scores. The findings indicated the necessity for imparting training and demonstrations and funding support as well as subsidy for larger adoption of IFS to reap higher returns.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250Acidificationeco-efficiencyeutrophicationfarming systemglobal warming potentialintegrated life cycle analysis
spellingShingle A. K. Nayak
Rahul Tripathi
B. Dhal
A. D. Nayak
S. Vijayakumar
B. Satpathy
D. Chatterjee
C. K. Swain
K. C. Moharana
P. K. Nayak
Annie Poonam
Sangita Mohanty
M. Shahid
Anjani Kumar
B. Mondal
B. B. Panda
A. K. Patra
S. K. Swain
H. Pathak
Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Acidification
eco-efficiency
eutrophication
farming system
global warming potential
integrated life cycle analysis
title Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India
title_full Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India
title_fullStr Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India
title_full_unstemmed Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India
title_short Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India
title_sort eco efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern india
topic Acidification
eco-efficiency
eutrophication
farming system
global warming potential
integrated life cycle analysis
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250
work_keys_str_mv AT aknayak ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT rahultripathi ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT bdhal ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT adnayak ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT svijayakumar ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT bsatpathy ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT dchatterjee ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT ckswain ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT kcmoharana ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT pknayak ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT anniepoonam ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT sangitamohanty ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT mshahid ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT anjanikumar ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT bmondal ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT bbpanda ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT akpatra ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT skswain ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia
AT hpathak ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia