Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India
ABSTRACTIntegrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their e...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2023-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250 |
_version_ | 1797648019973210112 |
---|---|
author | A. K. Nayak Rahul Tripathi B. Dhal A. D. Nayak S. Vijayakumar B. Satpathy D. Chatterjee C. K. Swain K. C. Moharana P. K. Nayak Annie Poonam Sangita Mohanty M. Shahid Anjani Kumar B. Mondal B. B. Panda A. K. Patra S. K. Swain H. Pathak |
author_facet | A. K. Nayak Rahul Tripathi B. Dhal A. D. Nayak S. Vijayakumar B. Satpathy D. Chatterjee C. K. Swain K. C. Moharana P. K. Nayak Annie Poonam Sangita Mohanty M. Shahid Anjani Kumar B. Mondal B. B. Panda A. K. Patra S. K. Swain H. Pathak |
author_sort | A. K. Nayak |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACTIntegrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their environment impact, eco-efficiency and technical efficiency (TE). The households, which own these IFS, were grouped into four major categories based on farm size viz., marginal (<0.8 ha), small (0.8–1.2 ha), medium (1.2–2.0 ha) and large (>2.0 ha). Among the farm size category, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded for marginal farms, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed for small farms. The highest eco-efficiency was recorded for farm having five enterprises (INR195 kg CO2eq. ha−1) followed by four enterprises (INR190 kg CO2eq.ha−1). Among the enterprises, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded in fruits, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed in dairy. The TE scores estimated using stochastic frontier analysis decreased with increasing farm size and the highest TE score was recorded for marginal farms, whereas medium and large farms recorded the lowest TE scores. The findings indicated the necessity for imparting training and demonstrations and funding support as well as subsidy for larger adoption of IFS to reap higher returns. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T15:25:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4f73183c9bdd4faf9b122c4472125cdc |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1473-5903 1747-762X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T15:25:04Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability |
spelling | doaj.art-4f73183c9bdd4faf9b122c4472125cdc2023-10-27T19:30:36ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability1473-59031747-762X2023-12-0121110.1080/14735903.2023.2270250Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern IndiaA. K. Nayak0Rahul Tripathi1B. Dhal2A. D. Nayak3S. Vijayakumar4B. Satpathy5D. Chatterjee6C. K. Swain7K. C. Moharana8P. K. Nayak9Annie Poonam10Sangita Mohanty11M. Shahid12Anjani Kumar13B. Mondal14B. B. Panda15A. K. Patra16S. K. Swain17H. Pathak18Crop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaOrissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, IndiaOrissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, IndiaCrop Production Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, IndiaABSTRACTIntegrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their environment impact, eco-efficiency and technical efficiency (TE). The households, which own these IFS, were grouped into four major categories based on farm size viz., marginal (<0.8 ha), small (0.8–1.2 ha), medium (1.2–2.0 ha) and large (>2.0 ha). Among the farm size category, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded for marginal farms, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed for small farms. The highest eco-efficiency was recorded for farm having five enterprises (INR195 kg CO2eq. ha−1) followed by four enterprises (INR190 kg CO2eq.ha−1). Among the enterprises, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded in fruits, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed in dairy. The TE scores estimated using stochastic frontier analysis decreased with increasing farm size and the highest TE score was recorded for marginal farms, whereas medium and large farms recorded the lowest TE scores. The findings indicated the necessity for imparting training and demonstrations and funding support as well as subsidy for larger adoption of IFS to reap higher returns.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250Acidificationeco-efficiencyeutrophicationfarming systemglobal warming potentialintegrated life cycle analysis |
spellingShingle | A. K. Nayak Rahul Tripathi B. Dhal A. D. Nayak S. Vijayakumar B. Satpathy D. Chatterjee C. K. Swain K. C. Moharana P. K. Nayak Annie Poonam Sangita Mohanty M. Shahid Anjani Kumar B. Mondal B. B. Panda A. K. Patra S. K. Swain H. Pathak Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability Acidification eco-efficiency eutrophication farming system global warming potential integrated life cycle analysis |
title | Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India |
title_full | Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India |
title_fullStr | Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India |
title_full_unstemmed | Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India |
title_short | Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India |
title_sort | eco efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern india |
topic | Acidification eco-efficiency eutrophication farming system global warming potential integrated life cycle analysis |
url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aknayak ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT rahultripathi ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT bdhal ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT adnayak ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT svijayakumar ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT bsatpathy ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT dchatterjee ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT ckswain ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT kcmoharana ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT pknayak ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT anniepoonam ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT sangitamohanty ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT mshahid ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT anjanikumar ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT bmondal ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT bbpanda ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT akpatra ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT skswain ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia AT hpathak ecoefficiencyandtechnicalefficiencyofdifferentintegratedfarmingsystemsineasternindia |