Comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty

Pankaj Jogi, Tom Overend, John Kramer School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada Background: Information available in the literature on clinically based and laboratory-based outcome measures of balance is limited. How much information is provided...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jogi P, Overend TJ, Kramer J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-04-01
Series:Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/comparisons-of-clinically-based-outcome-measures-and-laboratory-based--peer-reviewed-article-ORR
_version_ 1818538098178392064
author Jogi P
Overend TJ
Kramer J
author_facet Jogi P
Overend TJ
Kramer J
author_sort Jogi P
collection DOAJ
description Pankaj Jogi, Tom Overend, John Kramer School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada Background: Information available in the literature on clinically based and laboratory-based outcome measures of balance is limited. How much information is provided by clinically based outcome measures compared to laboratory-based measure in patients with total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not known. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between selected clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based force platform measure in patients following THA and TKA. Methods: Patients who underwent THA (n = 26) and TKA (n = 28) were evaluated at about 5–7 weeks following surgery. Participants were assessed using four clinically based outcome measures – 1) the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 2) the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), 3) the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), and 4) the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index-function subscale (WOMAC-function) – and one laboratory-based force plate measure (95% ellipse area). Results: Moderate correlations were observed between the BBS and the 95% ellipse area of force plate (r = 0.46–0.51) for the two-legged stance, the anterior lean stance, and the posterior lean stance. Fair correlations were observed between TUG and the 95% ellipse area of force plate (r = 0.31–0.37) for all the three test conditions. Low correlations were observed for the ABC and the WOMAC-function with the 95% ellipse area of force plate (r = 0.11–0.25) for all the three test conditions. Conclusion: The BBS demonstrated the greatest correlations with the 95% ellipse area of the force plate measure and should be preferred by physical therapists over the TUG, the ABC, and the WOMAC-function to assess balance in patients with THA and TKA. Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, force plate, clinical measures, balance
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:24:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f7325201c8f46798f6781b3610d67ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-1462
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:24:38Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Orthopedic Research and Reviews
spelling doaj.art-4f7325201c8f46798f6781b3610d67ec2022-12-22T00:50:21ZengDove Medical PressOrthopedic Research and Reviews1179-14622017-04-01Volume 9233332305Comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplastyJogi POverend TJKramer JPankaj Jogi, Tom Overend, John Kramer School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada Background: Information available in the literature on clinically based and laboratory-based outcome measures of balance is limited. How much information is provided by clinically based outcome measures compared to laboratory-based measure in patients with total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not known. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between selected clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based force platform measure in patients following THA and TKA. Methods: Patients who underwent THA (n = 26) and TKA (n = 28) were evaluated at about 5–7 weeks following surgery. Participants were assessed using four clinically based outcome measures – 1) the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 2) the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), 3) the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), and 4) the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index-function subscale (WOMAC-function) – and one laboratory-based force plate measure (95% ellipse area). Results: Moderate correlations were observed between the BBS and the 95% ellipse area of force plate (r = 0.46–0.51) for the two-legged stance, the anterior lean stance, and the posterior lean stance. Fair correlations were observed between TUG and the 95% ellipse area of force plate (r = 0.31–0.37) for all the three test conditions. Low correlations were observed for the ABC and the WOMAC-function with the 95% ellipse area of force plate (r = 0.11–0.25) for all the three test conditions. Conclusion: The BBS demonstrated the greatest correlations with the 95% ellipse area of the force plate measure and should be preferred by physical therapists over the TUG, the ABC, and the WOMAC-function to assess balance in patients with THA and TKA. Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, force plate, clinical measures, balancehttps://www.dovepress.com/comparisons-of-clinically-based-outcome-measures-and-laboratory-based--peer-reviewed-article-ORRtotal knee arthroplastytotal hip arthroplastyforce plateclinical measuresbalance
spellingShingle Jogi P
Overend TJ
Kramer J
Comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
total knee arthroplasty
total hip arthroplasty
force plate
clinical measures
balance
title Comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty
title_full Comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty
title_short Comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory-based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty
title_sort comparisons of clinically based outcome measures and laboratory based outcome measure for balance in patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty
topic total knee arthroplasty
total hip arthroplasty
force plate
clinical measures
balance
url https://www.dovepress.com/comparisons-of-clinically-based-outcome-measures-and-laboratory-based--peer-reviewed-article-ORR
work_keys_str_mv AT jogip comparisonsofclinicallybasedoutcomemeasuresandlaboratorybasedoutcomemeasureforbalanceinpatientsfollowingtotalhipandkneearthroplasty
AT overendtj comparisonsofclinicallybasedoutcomemeasuresandlaboratorybasedoutcomemeasureforbalanceinpatientsfollowingtotalhipandkneearthroplasty
AT kramerj comparisonsofclinicallybasedoutcomemeasuresandlaboratorybasedoutcomemeasureforbalanceinpatientsfollowingtotalhipandkneearthroplasty