Livelihood options of landless rural households in Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia: evidence from selected districts
Abstract Background The livelihood of rural households in Ethiopia, like in most developing countries, largely depends on land resource. However, nowadays most rural households are denied access to arable land in the highland of Ethiopia due to high population growth and shortage of arable land. Lan...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Agriculture & Food Security |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00413-9 |
| _version_ | 1797849896160591872 |
|---|---|
| author | Teklay Negash Haftu Etsay Metkel Aregay Gidey Kidu Zewil Machine |
| author_facet | Teklay Negash Haftu Etsay Metkel Aregay Gidey Kidu Zewil Machine |
| author_sort | Teklay Negash |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The livelihood of rural households in Ethiopia, like in most developing countries, largely depends on land resource. However, nowadays most rural households are denied access to arable land in the highland of Ethiopia due to high population growth and shortage of arable land. Landlessness is, therefore, becoming a serious social and economic problem in the rural highland areas of Ethiopia in general and Tigrai region in particular. This study, therefore, intends to explore the choice of livelihood strategies of landless rural households and assess the challenges and opportunities of the livelihoods of landless rural households in selected districts of Tigrai region. Methods This study is conducted in three randomly selected districts of Tigrai region, namely, Kilte-Awlaelo, Degua-Tembien, and Hintalo-Wajerat districts. For the purpose of this study, two Tabias were randomly chosen from each districts. Then, afterward, both primary and secondary data sources were consulted to address the specific objectives of this study. The primary data were collected from 258 randomly selected households and six focus group discussions. This study used Multivariate Probit and Negative Binomial Regression to analyze factors influencing the choice of livelihood strategies and the number of livelihood options adopted by the landless rural households, respectively. Results This study finds that the livelihood sources of the landless rural households in the study area include farm (90%), non-farm (72%), and off-farm (41%) economic activities. The result of the Multivariate Probit regression indicates that household head characteristics, human capital, social capital, physical capital, financial capital, and institution-related factors were significantly influencing the choice of livelihood strategies of the landless rural households. The results of the negative binomial regression model, on the other hand, assert that household head-related factors, social capital, and institution-related factors were significantly influencing the number of livelihood options adopted by the landless rural households. This study affirms that stone or sand selling, dairy farming, poultry production, animal fattening, and bee keeping are the major opportunities to improve the livelihood of the landless rural households. Moreover, this study also identifies that shortage of arable land, youth unemployment, lack of access to infrastructure, poor land administration, and lack of access to financial capital were the major challenges facing the landless rural households. Concluding remarks This study concludes that all stakeholders efforts to address the problem of landlessness need to be geared to enhance access of landless rural households to different livelihood capitals, such as human, social, financial, physical, and natural capitals. Moreover, rural township and village enterprises could enhance the access of landless rural households to market and job opportunities. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T18:52:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4f925f3853d4434ea53d934b552185e8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2048-7010 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T18:52:39Z |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Agriculture & Food Security |
| spelling | doaj.art-4f925f3853d4434ea53d934b552185e82023-04-09T11:24:01ZengBMCAgriculture & Food Security2048-70102023-04-0112111610.1186/s40066-023-00413-9Livelihood options of landless rural households in Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia: evidence from selected districtsTeklay Negash0Haftu Etsay1Metkel Aregay2Gidey Kidu3Zewil Machine4Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Mekelle UniversityDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Mekelle UniversityDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Mekelle UniversityDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Mekelle UniversityDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Mekelle UniversityAbstract Background The livelihood of rural households in Ethiopia, like in most developing countries, largely depends on land resource. However, nowadays most rural households are denied access to arable land in the highland of Ethiopia due to high population growth and shortage of arable land. Landlessness is, therefore, becoming a serious social and economic problem in the rural highland areas of Ethiopia in general and Tigrai region in particular. This study, therefore, intends to explore the choice of livelihood strategies of landless rural households and assess the challenges and opportunities of the livelihoods of landless rural households in selected districts of Tigrai region. Methods This study is conducted in three randomly selected districts of Tigrai region, namely, Kilte-Awlaelo, Degua-Tembien, and Hintalo-Wajerat districts. For the purpose of this study, two Tabias were randomly chosen from each districts. Then, afterward, both primary and secondary data sources were consulted to address the specific objectives of this study. The primary data were collected from 258 randomly selected households and six focus group discussions. This study used Multivariate Probit and Negative Binomial Regression to analyze factors influencing the choice of livelihood strategies and the number of livelihood options adopted by the landless rural households, respectively. Results This study finds that the livelihood sources of the landless rural households in the study area include farm (90%), non-farm (72%), and off-farm (41%) economic activities. The result of the Multivariate Probit regression indicates that household head characteristics, human capital, social capital, physical capital, financial capital, and institution-related factors were significantly influencing the choice of livelihood strategies of the landless rural households. The results of the negative binomial regression model, on the other hand, assert that household head-related factors, social capital, and institution-related factors were significantly influencing the number of livelihood options adopted by the landless rural households. This study affirms that stone or sand selling, dairy farming, poultry production, animal fattening, and bee keeping are the major opportunities to improve the livelihood of the landless rural households. Moreover, this study also identifies that shortage of arable land, youth unemployment, lack of access to infrastructure, poor land administration, and lack of access to financial capital were the major challenges facing the landless rural households. Concluding remarks This study concludes that all stakeholders efforts to address the problem of landlessness need to be geared to enhance access of landless rural households to different livelihood capitals, such as human, social, financial, physical, and natural capitals. Moreover, rural township and village enterprises could enhance the access of landless rural households to market and job opportunities.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00413-9Landless rural householdsLivelihood strategiesMultivariate probit modelNegative binomial regressionTigrai region |
| spellingShingle | Teklay Negash Haftu Etsay Metkel Aregay Gidey Kidu Zewil Machine Livelihood options of landless rural households in Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia: evidence from selected districts Agriculture & Food Security Landless rural households Livelihood strategies Multivariate probit model Negative binomial regression Tigrai region |
| title | Livelihood options of landless rural households in Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia: evidence from selected districts |
| title_full | Livelihood options of landless rural households in Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia: evidence from selected districts |
| title_fullStr | Livelihood options of landless rural households in Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia: evidence from selected districts |
| title_full_unstemmed | Livelihood options of landless rural households in Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia: evidence from selected districts |
| title_short | Livelihood options of landless rural households in Tigrai Region, Northern Ethiopia: evidence from selected districts |
| title_sort | livelihood options of landless rural households in tigrai region northern ethiopia evidence from selected districts |
| topic | Landless rural households Livelihood strategies Multivariate probit model Negative binomial regression Tigrai region |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00413-9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT teklaynegash livelihoodoptionsoflandlessruralhouseholdsintigrairegionnorthernethiopiaevidencefromselecteddistricts AT haftuetsay livelihoodoptionsoflandlessruralhouseholdsintigrairegionnorthernethiopiaevidencefromselecteddistricts AT metkelaregay livelihoodoptionsoflandlessruralhouseholdsintigrairegionnorthernethiopiaevidencefromselecteddistricts AT gideykidu livelihoodoptionsoflandlessruralhouseholdsintigrairegionnorthernethiopiaevidencefromselecteddistricts AT zewilmachine livelihoodoptionsoflandlessruralhouseholdsintigrairegionnorthernethiopiaevidencefromselecteddistricts |