Comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomy
Background: There is increasing interest in minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes as alternative surgical interference to conventional sternotomy. Minimally invasive coronary surgery was preferred due to its lower morbidity and less hospital stay. Objectives: Th...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
South Valley University, Faculty of Medicine
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | SVU - International Journal of Medical Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://svuijm.journals.ekb.eg/article_223324.html |
| _version_ | 1818474713018531840 |
|---|---|
| author | Hani Mahmoud Soliman Albatrek* Ashraf Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Hassan Ahmed Talaat Ahmed Ramadan |
| author_facet | Hani Mahmoud Soliman Albatrek* Ashraf Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Hassan Ahmed Talaat Ahmed Ramadan |
| author_sort | Hani Mahmoud Soliman Albatrek* |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: There is increasing interest in minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes as alternative surgical interference to conventional sternotomy. Minimally invasive coronary surgery was preferred due to its lower morbidity and less hospital stay.
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery versus conventional surgery via sternotomy.
Patients and Methods: This study included one hundred patients presented with diagnostic indications for the coronary artery bypass grafting coronary according to coronary angiography results. Patients operated either by minimally invasive or conventional techniques via sternotomy. All patients followed up using Echocardiography parameters that was compared preoperatively and postoperatively within 3 months.
Results: Included patients had mean age (50.6 ±11.5). There was female predominance (66 %). Most of included patients known to be hypertensive as 92% of cases in group A, and 86% of cases in group B. Postoperative echocardiography showed significant difference between both groups as compared with preoperativee values for each group separately.
Conclusion: Comparing open coronary artery bypass surgery and minimally invasive coronary artery bypass approaches, there are similar accepted perioperative outcomes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:39:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4f9e79b26f7a4e92b476fbbb06f4c19c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2735-427X 2636-3402 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:39:49Z |
| publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
| publisher | South Valley University, Faculty of Medicine |
| record_format | Article |
| series | SVU - International Journal of Medical Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-4f9e79b26f7a4e92b476fbbb06f4c19c2022-12-22T02:11:42ZengSouth Valley University, Faculty of MedicineSVU - International Journal of Medical Sciences2735-427X2636-34022022-07-0152 385393 https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/svuijm.2022.121258.1274Comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomyHani Mahmoud Soliman Albatrek*0Ashraf Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Hassan1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8973-5123 Ahmed Talaat Ahmed Ramadan2Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, National Heart Institute, Cairo, Egypt.Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, National Heart Institute, Cairo, Egypt.Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, National Heart Institute, Cairo, Egypt.Background: There is increasing interest in minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes as alternative surgical interference to conventional sternotomy. Minimally invasive coronary surgery was preferred due to its lower morbidity and less hospital stay. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery versus conventional surgery via sternotomy. Patients and Methods: This study included one hundred patients presented with diagnostic indications for the coronary artery bypass grafting coronary according to coronary angiography results. Patients operated either by minimally invasive or conventional techniques via sternotomy. All patients followed up using Echocardiography parameters that was compared preoperatively and postoperatively within 3 months. Results: Included patients had mean age (50.6 ±11.5). There was female predominance (66 %). Most of included patients known to be hypertensive as 92% of cases in group A, and 86% of cases in group B. Postoperative echocardiography showed significant difference between both groups as compared with preoperativee values for each group separately. Conclusion: Comparing open coronary artery bypass surgery and minimally invasive coronary artery bypass approaches, there are similar accepted perioperative outcomes.https://svuijm.journals.ekb.eg/article_223324.htmlcoronary artery bypass; echocardiography; sternotomy |
| spellingShingle | Hani Mahmoud Soliman Albatrek* Ashraf Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Hassan Ahmed Talaat Ahmed Ramadan Comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomy SVU - International Journal of Medical Sciences coronary artery bypass; echocardiography; sternotomy |
| title | Comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomy |
| title_full | Comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomy |
| title_fullStr | Comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomy |
| title_short | Comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomy |
| title_sort | comparative study between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft and traditional coronary surgery via sternotomy |
| topic | coronary artery bypass; echocardiography; sternotomy |
| url | https://svuijm.journals.ekb.eg/article_223324.html |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hanimahmoudsolimanalbatrek comparativestudybetweenminimallyinvasivedirectcoronaryarterybypassgraftandtraditionalcoronarysurgeryviasternotomy AT ashrafmohamedabdelazizhassan comparativestudybetweenminimallyinvasivedirectcoronaryarterybypassgraftandtraditionalcoronarysurgeryviasternotomy AT ahmedtalaatahmedramadan comparativestudybetweenminimallyinvasivedirectcoronaryarterybypassgraftandtraditionalcoronarysurgeryviasternotomy |