Comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial

IntroductionPea protein (PP) concentrate is a plant-based alternative to animal protein sources, such as whey protein (WP). In addition to its valuable amino acid composition, PP has a low environmental impact, making it a sustainable, nutritious, and viable alternative for enhanced sports performan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luiz Lannes Loureiro, Tathiany Jéssica Ferreira, Fábio Luiz Candido Cahuê, Victor Zaban Bittencourt, Ana Paula Valente, Anna Paola Trindade Rocha Pierucci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2023.1210215/full
_version_ 1827809050114392064
author Luiz Lannes Loureiro
Tathiany Jéssica Ferreira
Fábio Luiz Candido Cahuê
Victor Zaban Bittencourt
Ana Paula Valente
Anna Paola Trindade Rocha Pierucci
author_facet Luiz Lannes Loureiro
Tathiany Jéssica Ferreira
Fábio Luiz Candido Cahuê
Victor Zaban Bittencourt
Ana Paula Valente
Anna Paola Trindade Rocha Pierucci
author_sort Luiz Lannes Loureiro
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionPea protein (PP) concentrate is a plant-based alternative to animal protein sources, such as whey protein (WP). In addition to its valuable amino acid composition, PP has a low environmental impact, making it a sustainable, nutritious, and viable alternative for enhanced sports performance, such as in soccer. PP Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of PP and WP supplementation on biochemical and metabolic parameters in soccer players.MethodsTwelve male under-20 soccer players were included in this double-blind, randomized crossover intervention study. For 10 consecutive days, each participant received either 0.5 g/kg of the PP or WP supplementation after training, starting 7 days before the test game, and continuing until 2 days after. After a 4-day washout period, the athletes switched groups and the intervention was restarted. Blood samples were collected before and after the game, as well as 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h intervals thereafter. Creatine kinase (CK), aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase (ALT), lactate (LA), urea, creatinine, and uric acid were analyzed using commercial kits. Exploratory metabolic profiling of the serum samples was performed using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.ResultsA comparison of biochemical markers showed that the PP group had lower CK in the post-game moment, 24 h, and 48 h. Lower LA in the post-game moment, and lower ALT in the post-game moment and at 24 h. Of the 48 metabolites analyzed, 22 showed significant differences between the time points, such as amino acids, ketone bodies, and glucose metabolism. Glutamate and lactate levels significantly increased between the pre- and post-game moments in the WP group. After the game, the WP group exhibited reduced levels of metabolites such as arginine and taurine, whereas no such change was observed in the PP group. There was no difference in metabolites 72 h after the game.ConclusionsDespite the slight advantage of the PP group in specific biochemical markers, these differences are not sufficient to justify the choice of a particular type of protein. However, the results highlight the viability of plant protein as a potential alternative to animal protein without compromising athletic performance or recovery.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T22:36:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fa0405e09ee42ea956f7118a326764d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-861X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T22:36:47Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Nutrition
spelling doaj.art-4fa0405e09ee42ea956f7118a326764d2023-09-22T13:00:35ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2023-09-011010.3389/fnut.2023.12102151210215Comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trialLuiz Lannes Loureiro0Tathiany Jéssica Ferreira1Fábio Luiz Candido Cahuê2Victor Zaban Bittencourt3Ana Paula Valente4Anna Paola Trindade Rocha Pierucci5DAFEE Laboratory, Institute of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilDAFEE Laboratory, Institute of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilDAFEE Laboratory, Institute of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilDAFEE Laboratory, Institute of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilCNRMN, Structural Biology, Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilDAFEE Laboratory, Institute of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilIntroductionPea protein (PP) concentrate is a plant-based alternative to animal protein sources, such as whey protein (WP). In addition to its valuable amino acid composition, PP has a low environmental impact, making it a sustainable, nutritious, and viable alternative for enhanced sports performance, such as in soccer. PP Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of PP and WP supplementation on biochemical and metabolic parameters in soccer players.MethodsTwelve male under-20 soccer players were included in this double-blind, randomized crossover intervention study. For 10 consecutive days, each participant received either 0.5 g/kg of the PP or WP supplementation after training, starting 7 days before the test game, and continuing until 2 days after. After a 4-day washout period, the athletes switched groups and the intervention was restarted. Blood samples were collected before and after the game, as well as 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h intervals thereafter. Creatine kinase (CK), aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase (ALT), lactate (LA), urea, creatinine, and uric acid were analyzed using commercial kits. Exploratory metabolic profiling of the serum samples was performed using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.ResultsA comparison of biochemical markers showed that the PP group had lower CK in the post-game moment, 24 h, and 48 h. Lower LA in the post-game moment, and lower ALT in the post-game moment and at 24 h. Of the 48 metabolites analyzed, 22 showed significant differences between the time points, such as amino acids, ketone bodies, and glucose metabolism. Glutamate and lactate levels significantly increased between the pre- and post-game moments in the WP group. After the game, the WP group exhibited reduced levels of metabolites such as arginine and taurine, whereas no such change was observed in the PP group. There was no difference in metabolites 72 h after the game.ConclusionsDespite the slight advantage of the PP group in specific biochemical markers, these differences are not sufficient to justify the choice of a particular type of protein. However, the results highlight the viability of plant protein as a potential alternative to animal protein without compromising athletic performance or recovery.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2023.1210215/fullNMR spectroscopyplant proteindietary supplementsamino acidsrecovery
spellingShingle Luiz Lannes Loureiro
Tathiany Jéssica Ferreira
Fábio Luiz Candido Cahuê
Victor Zaban Bittencourt
Ana Paula Valente
Anna Paola Trindade Rocha Pierucci
Comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial
Frontiers in Nutrition
NMR spectroscopy
plant protein
dietary supplements
amino acids
recovery
title Comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial
title_full Comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial
title_short Comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial
title_sort comparison of the effects of pea protein and whey protein on the metabolic profile of soccer athletes a randomized double blind crossover trial
topic NMR spectroscopy
plant protein
dietary supplements
amino acids
recovery
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2023.1210215/full
work_keys_str_mv AT luizlannesloureiro comparisonoftheeffectsofpeaproteinandwheyproteinonthemetabolicprofileofsoccerathletesarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrial
AT tathianyjessicaferreira comparisonoftheeffectsofpeaproteinandwheyproteinonthemetabolicprofileofsoccerathletesarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrial
AT fabioluizcandidocahue comparisonoftheeffectsofpeaproteinandwheyproteinonthemetabolicprofileofsoccerathletesarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrial
AT victorzabanbittencourt comparisonoftheeffectsofpeaproteinandwheyproteinonthemetabolicprofileofsoccerathletesarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrial
AT anapaulavalente comparisonoftheeffectsofpeaproteinandwheyproteinonthemetabolicprofileofsoccerathletesarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrial
AT annapaolatrindaderochapierucci comparisonoftheeffectsofpeaproteinandwheyproteinonthemetabolicprofileofsoccerathletesarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrial