ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN PRODUCING WHEAT CROP

This research aimed to study the economical impacts of using different types of irrigation water to produce wheat crop, through economic analysis of crop production and its costs, in order to maximize the income of each unit of water. The sample of study was choosed from wheat farmers in El.Sharkia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Seham, A.A. Hashem
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: The Union of Arab Universities 2014-09-01
Series:Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ajs.journals.ekb.eg/article_14733_a9d720c68d6e3de3caae008ec8bf77ca.pdf
_version_ 1827323450198327296
author Seham, A.A. Hashem
author_facet Seham, A.A. Hashem
author_sort Seham, A.A. Hashem
collection DOAJ
description This research aimed to study the economical impacts of using different types of irrigation water to produce wheat crop, through economic analysis of crop production and its costs, in order to maximize the income of each unit of water. The sample of study was choosed from wheat farmers in El.Sharkia Governorate. The results indicated that the productivity of one feddan irrigated with fresh water and groundwater was 18.09 and 18.08 ardab/fed respectively. It was 17.72 and 17.11 ardab/fed. for land irrigated with mixed water and drainage water respectively. The feddan irrigated with fresh water consumed 2672 m3 compared with 2922, 2841 and 3263 m3 for groundwater, mixed water and drainage water respectively. The feddan of wheat irrigated with groundwater gave the high- est return of income changed costs that was 1.233 pounds. The farmers in the study sample used quantities of irrigation water greater than the amount that achieve efficiency in the case of irrigation with groundwater rate of 6.23%, while the farmers in the stud[1]y sample used quantities less than the amounts that achieve efficiency by 1.27%, 10.9%, 7.9% for wheat irrigated with fresh water, mixed water and drainage water, respectively. The research recommended using these different qualities of water in irrigation, but in the context of a set of parameters with not of focusing on the use of agricultural drainage water directly due to the Low productivity per feddan and the low average of water unit production and the share of water unit of the net return, certain attention should be paid to mixing drainage water with Nile water, and also to treating drainage water before mixing with fresh water of River Nile.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:51:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fb5255c6326446082d5bba23572a9c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-2675
2636-3585
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:51:52Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher The Union of Arab Universities
record_format Article
series Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences
spelling doaj.art-4fb5255c6326446082d5bba23572a9c32024-03-07T17:44:00ZaraThe Union of Arab UniversitiesArab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences1110-26752636-35852014-09-0122222323810.21608/ajs.2014.1473314733ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN PRODUCING WHEAT CROPSeham, A.A. Hashem0Institute of Environmental Studies and Research, Ain Shams University, Cairo, EgyptThis research aimed to study the economical impacts of using different types of irrigation water to produce wheat crop, through economic analysis of crop production and its costs, in order to maximize the income of each unit of water. The sample of study was choosed from wheat farmers in El.Sharkia Governorate. The results indicated that the productivity of one feddan irrigated with fresh water and groundwater was 18.09 and 18.08 ardab/fed respectively. It was 17.72 and 17.11 ardab/fed. for land irrigated with mixed water and drainage water respectively. The feddan irrigated with fresh water consumed 2672 m3 compared with 2922, 2841 and 3263 m3 for groundwater, mixed water and drainage water respectively. The feddan of wheat irrigated with groundwater gave the high- est return of income changed costs that was 1.233 pounds. The farmers in the study sample used quantities of irrigation water greater than the amount that achieve efficiency in the case of irrigation with groundwater rate of 6.23%, while the farmers in the stud[1]y sample used quantities less than the amounts that achieve efficiency by 1.27%, 10.9%, 7.9% for wheat irrigated with fresh water, mixed water and drainage water, respectively. The research recommended using these different qualities of water in irrigation, but in the context of a set of parameters with not of focusing on the use of agricultural drainage water directly due to the Low productivity per feddan and the low average of water unit production and the share of water unit of the net return, certain attention should be paid to mixing drainage water with Nile water, and also to treating drainage water before mixing with fresh water of River Nile.https://ajs.journals.ekb.eg/article_14733_a9d720c68d6e3de3caae008ec8bf77ca.pdfwheatproduction functioncost function
spellingShingle Seham, A.A. Hashem
ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN PRODUCING WHEAT CROP
Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences
wheat
production function
cost function
title ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN PRODUCING WHEAT CROP
title_full ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN PRODUCING WHEAT CROP
title_fullStr ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN PRODUCING WHEAT CROP
title_full_unstemmed ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN PRODUCING WHEAT CROP
title_short ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN PRODUCING WHEAT CROP
title_sort economical evaluation of using different types of irrigation water in producing wheat crop
topic wheat
production function
cost function
url https://ajs.journals.ekb.eg/article_14733_a9d720c68d6e3de3caae008ec8bf77ca.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sehamaahashem economicalevaluationofusingdifferenttypesofirrigationwaterinproducingwheatcrop