Perspectives on the Lindman Hypothesis and Cellulose Interactions

In the history of cellulose chemistry, hydrogen bonding has been the predominant explanation when discussing intermolecular interactions between cellulose polymers. This is the general consensus in scholarly textbooks and in many research articles, and it applies to several other biomacromolecules’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Magnus Norgren, Carolina Costa, Luís Alves, Alireza Eivazi, Christina Dahlström, Ida Svanedal, Håkan Edlund, Bruno Medronho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/10/4216
_version_ 1797598835411779584
author Magnus Norgren
Carolina Costa
Luís Alves
Alireza Eivazi
Christina Dahlström
Ida Svanedal
Håkan Edlund
Bruno Medronho
author_facet Magnus Norgren
Carolina Costa
Luís Alves
Alireza Eivazi
Christina Dahlström
Ida Svanedal
Håkan Edlund
Bruno Medronho
author_sort Magnus Norgren
collection DOAJ
description In the history of cellulose chemistry, hydrogen bonding has been the predominant explanation when discussing intermolecular interactions between cellulose polymers. This is the general consensus in scholarly textbooks and in many research articles, and it applies to several other biomacromolecules’ interactions as well. This rather unbalanced description of cellulose has likely impacted the development of materials based on the processing of cellulose—for example, via dissolution in various solvent systems and regeneration into solid materials, such as films and fibers, and even traditional wood fiber handling and papermaking. In this review, we take as a starting point the questioning of the general description of the nature of cellulose and cellulose interactions initiated by Professor Björn Lindman, based on generic physicochemical reasoning about surfactants and polymers. This dispute, which became known as “the Lindman hypothesis”, highlights the importance of hydrophobic interactions in cellulose systems and that cellulose is an amphiphilic polymer. This paper elaborates on Björn Lindman’s contribution to the subject, which has caused the scientific community to revisit cellulose and reconsider certain phenomena from other perspectives.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:26:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fc95f40fa4b45d8ace2751e9e71b483
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1420-3049
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:26:20Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj.art-4fc95f40fa4b45d8ace2751e9e71b4832023-11-18T02:41:01ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492023-05-012810421610.3390/molecules28104216Perspectives on the Lindman Hypothesis and Cellulose InteractionsMagnus Norgren0Carolina Costa1Luís Alves2Alireza Eivazi3Christina Dahlström4Ida Svanedal5Håkan Edlund6Bruno Medronho7Surface and Colloid Engineering, FSCN Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, SwedenSurface and Colloid Engineering, FSCN Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, SwedenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, CIEPQPF—Chemical Processes and Forest Products Engineering Research Centre, University of Coimbra, Pólo II–R. Silvio Lima, 3030-790 Coimbra, PortugalSurface and Colloid Engineering, FSCN Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, SwedenSurface and Colloid Engineering, FSCN Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, SwedenSurface and Colloid Engineering, FSCN Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, SwedenSurface and Colloid Engineering, FSCN Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, SwedenSurface and Colloid Engineering, FSCN Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, SwedenIn the history of cellulose chemistry, hydrogen bonding has been the predominant explanation when discussing intermolecular interactions between cellulose polymers. This is the general consensus in scholarly textbooks and in many research articles, and it applies to several other biomacromolecules’ interactions as well. This rather unbalanced description of cellulose has likely impacted the development of materials based on the processing of cellulose—for example, via dissolution in various solvent systems and regeneration into solid materials, such as films and fibers, and even traditional wood fiber handling and papermaking. In this review, we take as a starting point the questioning of the general description of the nature of cellulose and cellulose interactions initiated by Professor Björn Lindman, based on generic physicochemical reasoning about surfactants and polymers. This dispute, which became known as “the Lindman hypothesis”, highlights the importance of hydrophobic interactions in cellulose systems and that cellulose is an amphiphilic polymer. This paper elaborates on Björn Lindman’s contribution to the subject, which has caused the scientific community to revisit cellulose and reconsider certain phenomena from other perspectives.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/10/4216celluloseamphiphilicityintermolecular interactionsdissolutionregenerationemulsification
spellingShingle Magnus Norgren
Carolina Costa
Luís Alves
Alireza Eivazi
Christina Dahlström
Ida Svanedal
Håkan Edlund
Bruno Medronho
Perspectives on the Lindman Hypothesis and Cellulose Interactions
Molecules
cellulose
amphiphilicity
intermolecular interactions
dissolution
regeneration
emulsification
title Perspectives on the Lindman Hypothesis and Cellulose Interactions
title_full Perspectives on the Lindman Hypothesis and Cellulose Interactions
title_fullStr Perspectives on the Lindman Hypothesis and Cellulose Interactions
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on the Lindman Hypothesis and Cellulose Interactions
title_short Perspectives on the Lindman Hypothesis and Cellulose Interactions
title_sort perspectives on the lindman hypothesis and cellulose interactions
topic cellulose
amphiphilicity
intermolecular interactions
dissolution
regeneration
emulsification
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/10/4216
work_keys_str_mv AT magnusnorgren perspectivesonthelindmanhypothesisandcelluloseinteractions
AT carolinacosta perspectivesonthelindmanhypothesisandcelluloseinteractions
AT luisalves perspectivesonthelindmanhypothesisandcelluloseinteractions
AT alirezaeivazi perspectivesonthelindmanhypothesisandcelluloseinteractions
AT christinadahlstrom perspectivesonthelindmanhypothesisandcelluloseinteractions
AT idasvanedal perspectivesonthelindmanhypothesisandcelluloseinteractions
AT hakanedlund perspectivesonthelindmanhypothesisandcelluloseinteractions
AT brunomedronho perspectivesonthelindmanhypothesisandcelluloseinteractions