Driving Behavior and Decision Mechanisms in Emergency Conditions

In this article we used simulator experiments to explore the intelligent mechanisms of human decision-making. Three types of typical emergency scenarios were used in the experiment, in which Scenario 1 was used to analyze the driver’s choice to protect themselves or to protect pedestrians in emergen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying Lyu, Yiteng Sun, Tianyao Zhang, Debao Kong, Zheng Lv, Yujie Liu, Zhenhai Gao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:World Electric Vehicle Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/13/4/62
_version_ 1797408908946440192
author Ying Lyu
Yiteng Sun
Tianyao Zhang
Debao Kong
Zheng Lv
Yujie Liu
Zhenhai Gao
author_facet Ying Lyu
Yiteng Sun
Tianyao Zhang
Debao Kong
Zheng Lv
Yujie Liu
Zhenhai Gao
author_sort Ying Lyu
collection DOAJ
description In this article we used simulator experiments to explore the intelligent mechanisms of human decision-making. Three types of typical emergency scenarios were used in the experiment, in which Scenario 1 was used to analyze the driver’s choice to protect themselves or to protect pedestrians in emergency situations. Scenario 2 was compared with Scenario 1 to verify whether the driver’s avoidance behavior to protect pedestrians was instinctive or selective. Scenario 3 was to verify whether the driver would follow the principle of damage minimization. The driver’s decisions and actions in emergency situations, from the cumulative frequency of time to collision (TTC) to the maximum steering wheel angle rate during the experiments, were recorded. The results show that the driver was not just instinctively avoiding the immediate obstacle, but more selectively protecting pedestrians. At the same time, the time taken up by the driver’s instinctive avoidance response also had a negative impact on decision-making. The actual decisions of the driver were analyzed to provide a basis for building up the ethical decision-making of autonomous vehicles.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T04:05:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fcd68482ae94fbb843cb683bff1a7db
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2032-6653
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T04:05:23Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series World Electric Vehicle Journal
spelling doaj.art-4fcd68482ae94fbb843cb683bff1a7db2023-12-03T14:06:49ZengMDPI AGWorld Electric Vehicle Journal2032-66532022-04-011346210.3390/wevj13040062Driving Behavior and Decision Mechanisms in Emergency ConditionsYing Lyu0Yiteng Sun1Tianyao Zhang2Debao Kong3Zheng Lv4Yujie Liu5Zhenhai Gao6State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Technology on Automobile Vibration and Noise & Safety Control, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Technology on Automobile Vibration and Noise & Safety Control, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Technology on Automobile Vibration and Noise & Safety Control, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, ChinaIn this article we used simulator experiments to explore the intelligent mechanisms of human decision-making. Three types of typical emergency scenarios were used in the experiment, in which Scenario 1 was used to analyze the driver’s choice to protect themselves or to protect pedestrians in emergency situations. Scenario 2 was compared with Scenario 1 to verify whether the driver’s avoidance behavior to protect pedestrians was instinctive or selective. Scenario 3 was to verify whether the driver would follow the principle of damage minimization. The driver’s decisions and actions in emergency situations, from the cumulative frequency of time to collision (TTC) to the maximum steering wheel angle rate during the experiments, were recorded. The results show that the driver was not just instinctively avoiding the immediate obstacle, but more selectively protecting pedestrians. At the same time, the time taken up by the driver’s instinctive avoidance response also had a negative impact on decision-making. The actual decisions of the driver were analyzed to provide a basis for building up the ethical decision-making of autonomous vehicles.https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/13/4/62driving behaviortime to collisionautonomous vehicledecision making
spellingShingle Ying Lyu
Yiteng Sun
Tianyao Zhang
Debao Kong
Zheng Lv
Yujie Liu
Zhenhai Gao
Driving Behavior and Decision Mechanisms in Emergency Conditions
World Electric Vehicle Journal
driving behavior
time to collision
autonomous vehicle
decision making
title Driving Behavior and Decision Mechanisms in Emergency Conditions
title_full Driving Behavior and Decision Mechanisms in Emergency Conditions
title_fullStr Driving Behavior and Decision Mechanisms in Emergency Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Driving Behavior and Decision Mechanisms in Emergency Conditions
title_short Driving Behavior and Decision Mechanisms in Emergency Conditions
title_sort driving behavior and decision mechanisms in emergency conditions
topic driving behavior
time to collision
autonomous vehicle
decision making
url https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/13/4/62
work_keys_str_mv AT yinglyu drivingbehavioranddecisionmechanismsinemergencyconditions
AT yitengsun drivingbehavioranddecisionmechanismsinemergencyconditions
AT tianyaozhang drivingbehavioranddecisionmechanismsinemergencyconditions
AT debaokong drivingbehavioranddecisionmechanismsinemergencyconditions
AT zhenglv drivingbehavioranddecisionmechanismsinemergencyconditions
AT yujieliu drivingbehavioranddecisionmechanismsinemergencyconditions
AT zhenhaigao drivingbehavioranddecisionmechanismsinemergencyconditions