The Dilemma of Communicative Action and Rational Strategy in Water Governance; Qualitative Research of the Communicative Process of Water Stakeholders in Rafsenjan Plain

The government has not succeeded in governing the common pool resources. As a result, some groups are searching for their answers in privatization management and others believe in participatory management. This research compares the communicative approaches of stakeholders regarding the groundwater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SeyedehBahar ‌‌Zandrazavi, Hadi Khaniki, Daryoush Boostani, Akbar Nasrolahi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2019-09-01
Series:Dānishhā-yi būmī-i Īrān
Subjects:
Online Access:https://qjik.atu.ac.ir/article_11678_a248419ce06c539870ce8fe212cdf32d.pdf
_version_ 1827283670223814656
author SeyedehBahar ‌‌Zandrazavi
Hadi Khaniki
Daryoush Boostani
Akbar Nasrolahi
author_facet SeyedehBahar ‌‌Zandrazavi
Hadi Khaniki
Daryoush Boostani
Akbar Nasrolahi
author_sort SeyedehBahar ‌‌Zandrazavi
collection DOAJ
description The government has not succeeded in governing the common pool resources. As a result, some groups are searching for their answers in privatization management and others believe in participatory management. This research compares the communicative approaches of stakeholders regarding the groundwater sustainability in Rafsenjan plain. The research methodology was grounded theory (GT). Participants were chosen through snowball sampling and theoretical saturation to maximize variation sampling. Focus group discussions were conductedamong a total of 115 people in ten stakeholders’ groups. Each sub-group consisted of 10 to 15 members. The researchers learned about two different approaches among water stakeholders. Those groups being interested in communicative action have seen the reasons for the water instability as "lack of civil society in water law regulation", "water-based employment policies". They insisted on strategies like "participation", "fairness" and "accountability"for a way out. In contrast, the other group found the reasons for the water instability in "energy subsidy", "farmers' lack of technical awareness" and " vague water rules" and their proposal is the "water's market" and "extension". These two different approaches derive from two different perceptions’ "participatory" and "rational strategy". As a result,they had a different attitude toward groundwater management and sustainability
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:40:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fd6442be27343299ef62d2a54759830
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-6019
2538-2543
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:40:49Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Dānishhā-yi būmī-i Īrān
spelling doaj.art-4fd6442be27343299ef62d2a547598302024-04-15T06:31:37ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressDānishhā-yi būmī-i Īrān2345-60192538-25432019-09-0161225127810.22054/qjik.2020.49865.118711678The Dilemma of Communicative Action and Rational Strategy in Water Governance; Qualitative Research of the Communicative Process of Water Stakeholders in Rafsenjan PlainSeyedehBahar ‌‌Zandrazavi0Hadi Khaniki1Daryoush Boostani2Akbar Nasrolahi3Student of PhD in Communication Sciences Azad University - North Tehran BranchFaculty Member of Allameh Tabatabaei UniversityMember of faculty member of social sciences department of Shahid Bahonar UniversityFaculty Member of Communication, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran BranchThe government has not succeeded in governing the common pool resources. As a result, some groups are searching for their answers in privatization management and others believe in participatory management. This research compares the communicative approaches of stakeholders regarding the groundwater sustainability in Rafsenjan plain. The research methodology was grounded theory (GT). Participants were chosen through snowball sampling and theoretical saturation to maximize variation sampling. Focus group discussions were conductedamong a total of 115 people in ten stakeholders’ groups. Each sub-group consisted of 10 to 15 members. The researchers learned about two different approaches among water stakeholders. Those groups being interested in communicative action have seen the reasons for the water instability as "lack of civil society in water law regulation", "water-based employment policies". They insisted on strategies like "participation", "fairness" and "accountability"for a way out. In contrast, the other group found the reasons for the water instability in "energy subsidy", "farmers' lack of technical awareness" and " vague water rules" and their proposal is the "water's market" and "extension". These two different approaches derive from two different perceptions’ "participatory" and "rational strategy". As a result,they had a different attitude toward groundwater management and sustainabilityhttps://qjik.atu.ac.ir/article_11678_a248419ce06c539870ce8fe212cdf32d.pdfnatural resources governancecommunicative actiongroundwater resource instabilitygrounded theoryrafsenjan
spellingShingle SeyedehBahar ‌‌Zandrazavi
Hadi Khaniki
Daryoush Boostani
Akbar Nasrolahi
The Dilemma of Communicative Action and Rational Strategy in Water Governance; Qualitative Research of the Communicative Process of Water Stakeholders in Rafsenjan Plain
Dānishhā-yi būmī-i Īrān
natural resources governance
communicative action
groundwater resource instability
grounded theory
rafsenjan
title The Dilemma of Communicative Action and Rational Strategy in Water Governance; Qualitative Research of the Communicative Process of Water Stakeholders in Rafsenjan Plain
title_full The Dilemma of Communicative Action and Rational Strategy in Water Governance; Qualitative Research of the Communicative Process of Water Stakeholders in Rafsenjan Plain
title_fullStr The Dilemma of Communicative Action and Rational Strategy in Water Governance; Qualitative Research of the Communicative Process of Water Stakeholders in Rafsenjan Plain
title_full_unstemmed The Dilemma of Communicative Action and Rational Strategy in Water Governance; Qualitative Research of the Communicative Process of Water Stakeholders in Rafsenjan Plain
title_short The Dilemma of Communicative Action and Rational Strategy in Water Governance; Qualitative Research of the Communicative Process of Water Stakeholders in Rafsenjan Plain
title_sort dilemma of communicative action and rational strategy in water governance qualitative research of the communicative process of water stakeholders in rafsenjan plain
topic natural resources governance
communicative action
groundwater resource instability
grounded theory
rafsenjan
url https://qjik.atu.ac.ir/article_11678_a248419ce06c539870ce8fe212cdf32d.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedehbaharzandrazavi thedilemmaofcommunicativeactionandrationalstrategyinwatergovernancequalitativeresearchofthecommunicativeprocessofwaterstakeholdersinrafsenjanplain
AT hadikhaniki thedilemmaofcommunicativeactionandrationalstrategyinwatergovernancequalitativeresearchofthecommunicativeprocessofwaterstakeholdersinrafsenjanplain
AT daryoushboostani thedilemmaofcommunicativeactionandrationalstrategyinwatergovernancequalitativeresearchofthecommunicativeprocessofwaterstakeholdersinrafsenjanplain
AT akbarnasrolahi thedilemmaofcommunicativeactionandrationalstrategyinwatergovernancequalitativeresearchofthecommunicativeprocessofwaterstakeholdersinrafsenjanplain
AT seyedehbaharzandrazavi dilemmaofcommunicativeactionandrationalstrategyinwatergovernancequalitativeresearchofthecommunicativeprocessofwaterstakeholdersinrafsenjanplain
AT hadikhaniki dilemmaofcommunicativeactionandrationalstrategyinwatergovernancequalitativeresearchofthecommunicativeprocessofwaterstakeholdersinrafsenjanplain
AT daryoushboostani dilemmaofcommunicativeactionandrationalstrategyinwatergovernancequalitativeresearchofthecommunicativeprocessofwaterstakeholdersinrafsenjanplain
AT akbarnasrolahi dilemmaofcommunicativeactionandrationalstrategyinwatergovernancequalitativeresearchofthecommunicativeprocessofwaterstakeholdersinrafsenjanplain