Ephemeral Transparency: Glass as a Reflective Screen and Opaque Veil in the New National Gallery

This article evaluates the dilemma between intentions and outcomes, based on the transparency debate that has recently resurfaced, by undertaking a critical reading of essential architectural history texts. Using the New National Gallery by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, in Berlin, as the central focus,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Deniz Balik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Los Andes 2017-12-01
Series:Dearq
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.18389/dearq21.2017.08
_version_ 1819046568555184128
author Deniz Balik
author_facet Deniz Balik
author_sort Deniz Balik
collection DOAJ
description This article evaluates the dilemma between intentions and outcomes, based on the transparency debate that has recently resurfaced, by undertaking a critical reading of essential architectural history texts. Using the New National Gallery by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, in Berlin, as the central focus, it argues that, in reality, transparent buildings do not always allow clear vision, free flow, circulation, connection, and accessibility. As a result, the building challenges modern notions by presenting glass as an ephemeral and temporal reflective screen and a condensed opaque veil due to its context and content.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T10:46:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fd6c9125f2c46738f37b57582872762
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2011-3188
2215-969X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T10:46:32Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Universidad de Los Andes
record_format Article
series Dearq
spelling doaj.art-4fd6c9125f2c46738f37b575828727622022-12-21T19:06:48ZengUniversidad de Los AndesDearq2011-31882215-969X2017-12-012110.18389/dearq21.2017.08Ephemeral Transparency: Glass as a Reflective Screen and Opaque Veil in the New National GalleryDeniz BalikThis article evaluates the dilemma between intentions and outcomes, based on the transparency debate that has recently resurfaced, by undertaking a critical reading of essential architectural history texts. Using the New National Gallery by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, in Berlin, as the central focus, it argues that, in reality, transparent buildings do not always allow clear vision, free flow, circulation, connection, and accessibility. As a result, the building challenges modern notions by presenting glass as an ephemeral and temporal reflective screen and a condensed opaque veil due to its context and content.https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.18389/dearq21.2017.08transparencyglassclimatereflectionMies van der Rohe
spellingShingle Deniz Balik
Ephemeral Transparency: Glass as a Reflective Screen and Opaque Veil in the New National Gallery
Dearq
transparency
glass
climate
reflection
Mies van der Rohe
title Ephemeral Transparency: Glass as a Reflective Screen and Opaque Veil in the New National Gallery
title_full Ephemeral Transparency: Glass as a Reflective Screen and Opaque Veil in the New National Gallery
title_fullStr Ephemeral Transparency: Glass as a Reflective Screen and Opaque Veil in the New National Gallery
title_full_unstemmed Ephemeral Transparency: Glass as a Reflective Screen and Opaque Veil in the New National Gallery
title_short Ephemeral Transparency: Glass as a Reflective Screen and Opaque Veil in the New National Gallery
title_sort ephemeral transparency glass as a reflective screen and opaque veil in the new national gallery
topic transparency
glass
climate
reflection
Mies van der Rohe
url https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.18389/dearq21.2017.08
work_keys_str_mv AT denizbalik ephemeraltransparencyglassasareflectivescreenandopaqueveilinthenewnationalgallery