Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China
Land use change has significant impacts on the regional and global environment; thus, in-depth research on the associated ecological risks is necessary for promoting ecological restoration and sustainable development. Xinjiang, China, is characterized by a fragile ecological environment, and this st...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-04-01
|
Series: | Land |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/895 |
_version_ | 1827744708974084096 |
---|---|
author | Yaqi Cheng Wei Song Hao Yu Xi Wei Shuangqing Sheng Bo Liu He Gao Junfang Li Congjie Cao Dazhi Yang |
author_facet | Yaqi Cheng Wei Song Hao Yu Xi Wei Shuangqing Sheng Bo Liu He Gao Junfang Li Congjie Cao Dazhi Yang |
author_sort | Yaqi Cheng |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Land use change has significant impacts on the regional and global environment; thus, in-depth research on the associated ecological risks is necessary for promoting ecological restoration and sustainable development. Xinjiang, China, is characterized by a fragile ecological environment, and this study aimed to predict the land use change in the region in 2030 under different scenarios, including natural development, ecological conservation, and urban development, by using the PLUS model based on land use data from 2000, 2010, and 2020. Based on the landscape structure of regional ecosystems, we developed a comprehensive ecological risk assessment framework by utilizing a combination of landscape disturbance index, vulnerability index, and loss index. This framework allowed us to evaluate the spatiotemporal patterns and variations of landscape ecological risks under different scenarios in 2030. The study results indicate the following: (1) During the period from 2000 to 2020, the primary landscape type in Xinjiang was unused land. However, significant changes were observed in the area of cultivated land, mainly due to the conversion of grassland and construction land. The expansion of construction land during the urbanization process resulted in a decline in ecological landscapes, such as grassland, thereby weakening the ecosystem’s stability. (2) Under different simulation scenarios, the urban development scenario primarily led to the conversion of unused land into construction land, which is beneficial for economic development. On the other hand, the ecological conservation scenario resulted in a modest increase in construction land and a transformation of unused land into forest and grassland, which aligns with the principles of sustainable development. (3) Different scenarios in 2030 result in varying degrees of changes in each landscape type in Xinjiang, with the spatial distribution characteristics of landscape ecological risks remaining similar to those observed in 2020. Notably, under the urban development scenario, the area of lowest and medium risk areas decreases significantly while the area of higher and highest risk areas increases substantially. Conversely, under the ecological conservation scenario, the area of the lowest risk areas experiences a more significant increase. (4) Overall, the spatial differences in the ecological risk of Xinjiang’s landscape are significant, with HH and LL clustering types predominating and presenting a polarization pattern. The distribution pattern is low in the north and high in the central and southern parts of the study area. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T04:49:55Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4fdeb0da6175462d8bfb650b32f93b71 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-445X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T04:49:55Z |
publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Land |
spelling | doaj.art-4fdeb0da6175462d8bfb650b32f93b712023-11-17T20:03:46ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2023-04-0112489510.3390/land12040895Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, ChinaYaqi Cheng0Wei Song1Hao Yu2Xi Wei3Shuangqing Sheng4Bo Liu5He Gao6Junfang Li7Congjie Cao8Dazhi Yang9School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaLand use change has significant impacts on the regional and global environment; thus, in-depth research on the associated ecological risks is necessary for promoting ecological restoration and sustainable development. Xinjiang, China, is characterized by a fragile ecological environment, and this study aimed to predict the land use change in the region in 2030 under different scenarios, including natural development, ecological conservation, and urban development, by using the PLUS model based on land use data from 2000, 2010, and 2020. Based on the landscape structure of regional ecosystems, we developed a comprehensive ecological risk assessment framework by utilizing a combination of landscape disturbance index, vulnerability index, and loss index. This framework allowed us to evaluate the spatiotemporal patterns and variations of landscape ecological risks under different scenarios in 2030. The study results indicate the following: (1) During the period from 2000 to 2020, the primary landscape type in Xinjiang was unused land. However, significant changes were observed in the area of cultivated land, mainly due to the conversion of grassland and construction land. The expansion of construction land during the urbanization process resulted in a decline in ecological landscapes, such as grassland, thereby weakening the ecosystem’s stability. (2) Under different simulation scenarios, the urban development scenario primarily led to the conversion of unused land into construction land, which is beneficial for economic development. On the other hand, the ecological conservation scenario resulted in a modest increase in construction land and a transformation of unused land into forest and grassland, which aligns with the principles of sustainable development. (3) Different scenarios in 2030 result in varying degrees of changes in each landscape type in Xinjiang, with the spatial distribution characteristics of landscape ecological risks remaining similar to those observed in 2020. Notably, under the urban development scenario, the area of lowest and medium risk areas decreases significantly while the area of higher and highest risk areas increases substantially. Conversely, under the ecological conservation scenario, the area of the lowest risk areas experiences a more significant increase. (4) Overall, the spatial differences in the ecological risk of Xinjiang’s landscape are significant, with HH and LL clustering types predominating and presenting a polarization pattern. The distribution pattern is low in the north and high in the central and southern parts of the study area.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/895landscape ecological riskland use changePLUS modelscenario simulationXinjiang |
spellingShingle | Yaqi Cheng Wei Song Hao Yu Xi Wei Shuangqing Sheng Bo Liu He Gao Junfang Li Congjie Cao Dazhi Yang Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China Land landscape ecological risk land use change PLUS model scenario simulation Xinjiang |
title | Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China |
title_full | Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China |
title_fullStr | Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China |
title_short | Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China |
title_sort | assessment and prediction of landscape ecological risk from land use change in xinjiang china |
topic | landscape ecological risk land use change PLUS model scenario simulation Xinjiang |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaqicheng assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT weisong assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT haoyu assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT xiwei assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT shuangqingsheng assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT boliu assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT hegao assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT junfangli assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT congjiecao assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina AT dazhiyang assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina |