Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China

Land use change has significant impacts on the regional and global environment; thus, in-depth research on the associated ecological risks is necessary for promoting ecological restoration and sustainable development. Xinjiang, China, is characterized by a fragile ecological environment, and this st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yaqi Cheng, Wei Song, Hao Yu, Xi Wei, Shuangqing Sheng, Bo Liu, He Gao, Junfang Li, Congjie Cao, Dazhi Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/895
_version_ 1827744708974084096
author Yaqi Cheng
Wei Song
Hao Yu
Xi Wei
Shuangqing Sheng
Bo Liu
He Gao
Junfang Li
Congjie Cao
Dazhi Yang
author_facet Yaqi Cheng
Wei Song
Hao Yu
Xi Wei
Shuangqing Sheng
Bo Liu
He Gao
Junfang Li
Congjie Cao
Dazhi Yang
author_sort Yaqi Cheng
collection DOAJ
description Land use change has significant impacts on the regional and global environment; thus, in-depth research on the associated ecological risks is necessary for promoting ecological restoration and sustainable development. Xinjiang, China, is characterized by a fragile ecological environment, and this study aimed to predict the land use change in the region in 2030 under different scenarios, including natural development, ecological conservation, and urban development, by using the PLUS model based on land use data from 2000, 2010, and 2020. Based on the landscape structure of regional ecosystems, we developed a comprehensive ecological risk assessment framework by utilizing a combination of landscape disturbance index, vulnerability index, and loss index. This framework allowed us to evaluate the spatiotemporal patterns and variations of landscape ecological risks under different scenarios in 2030. The study results indicate the following: (1) During the period from 2000 to 2020, the primary landscape type in Xinjiang was unused land. However, significant changes were observed in the area of cultivated land, mainly due to the conversion of grassland and construction land. The expansion of construction land during the urbanization process resulted in a decline in ecological landscapes, such as grassland, thereby weakening the ecosystem’s stability. (2) Under different simulation scenarios, the urban development scenario primarily led to the conversion of unused land into construction land, which is beneficial for economic development. On the other hand, the ecological conservation scenario resulted in a modest increase in construction land and a transformation of unused land into forest and grassland, which aligns with the principles of sustainable development. (3) Different scenarios in 2030 result in varying degrees of changes in each landscape type in Xinjiang, with the spatial distribution characteristics of landscape ecological risks remaining similar to those observed in 2020. Notably, under the urban development scenario, the area of lowest and medium risk areas decreases significantly while the area of higher and highest risk areas increases substantially. Conversely, under the ecological conservation scenario, the area of the lowest risk areas experiences a more significant increase. (4) Overall, the spatial differences in the ecological risk of Xinjiang’s landscape are significant, with HH and LL clustering types predominating and presenting a polarization pattern. The distribution pattern is low in the north and high in the central and southern parts of the study area.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:49:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fdeb0da6175462d8bfb650b32f93b71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:49:55Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-4fdeb0da6175462d8bfb650b32f93b712023-11-17T20:03:46ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2023-04-0112489510.3390/land12040895Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, ChinaYaqi Cheng0Wei Song1Hao Yu2Xi Wei3Shuangqing Sheng4Bo Liu5He Gao6Junfang Li7Congjie Cao8Dazhi Yang9School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaLand use change has significant impacts on the regional and global environment; thus, in-depth research on the associated ecological risks is necessary for promoting ecological restoration and sustainable development. Xinjiang, China, is characterized by a fragile ecological environment, and this study aimed to predict the land use change in the region in 2030 under different scenarios, including natural development, ecological conservation, and urban development, by using the PLUS model based on land use data from 2000, 2010, and 2020. Based on the landscape structure of regional ecosystems, we developed a comprehensive ecological risk assessment framework by utilizing a combination of landscape disturbance index, vulnerability index, and loss index. This framework allowed us to evaluate the spatiotemporal patterns and variations of landscape ecological risks under different scenarios in 2030. The study results indicate the following: (1) During the period from 2000 to 2020, the primary landscape type in Xinjiang was unused land. However, significant changes were observed in the area of cultivated land, mainly due to the conversion of grassland and construction land. The expansion of construction land during the urbanization process resulted in a decline in ecological landscapes, such as grassland, thereby weakening the ecosystem’s stability. (2) Under different simulation scenarios, the urban development scenario primarily led to the conversion of unused land into construction land, which is beneficial for economic development. On the other hand, the ecological conservation scenario resulted in a modest increase in construction land and a transformation of unused land into forest and grassland, which aligns with the principles of sustainable development. (3) Different scenarios in 2030 result in varying degrees of changes in each landscape type in Xinjiang, with the spatial distribution characteristics of landscape ecological risks remaining similar to those observed in 2020. Notably, under the urban development scenario, the area of lowest and medium risk areas decreases significantly while the area of higher and highest risk areas increases substantially. Conversely, under the ecological conservation scenario, the area of the lowest risk areas experiences a more significant increase. (4) Overall, the spatial differences in the ecological risk of Xinjiang’s landscape are significant, with HH and LL clustering types predominating and presenting a polarization pattern. The distribution pattern is low in the north and high in the central and southern parts of the study area.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/895landscape ecological riskland use changePLUS modelscenario simulationXinjiang
spellingShingle Yaqi Cheng
Wei Song
Hao Yu
Xi Wei
Shuangqing Sheng
Bo Liu
He Gao
Junfang Li
Congjie Cao
Dazhi Yang
Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China
Land
landscape ecological risk
land use change
PLUS model
scenario simulation
Xinjiang
title Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China
title_full Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China
title_fullStr Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China
title_short Assessment and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risk from Land Use Change in Xinjiang, China
title_sort assessment and prediction of landscape ecological risk from land use change in xinjiang china
topic landscape ecological risk
land use change
PLUS model
scenario simulation
Xinjiang
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/895
work_keys_str_mv AT yaqicheng assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT weisong assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT haoyu assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT xiwei assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT shuangqingsheng assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT boliu assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT hegao assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT junfangli assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT congjiecao assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina
AT dazhiyang assessmentandpredictionoflandscapeecologicalriskfromlandusechangeinxinjiangchina