Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after heart transplantation (HTx) can cause cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Consequently, monitoring and prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus deoxyribonucleic acid (CMV‐DNAemia) within the first weeks after HTx is recommended. Methods All patients who...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moritz Benjamin Immohr, Daniel Oehler, Freya Sophie Jenkins, Nikolas Kalampokas, Vincent Hendrik Hettlich, Dennis Sigetti, Fabian Voß, Hannan Dalyanoglu, Hug Aubin, Payam Akhyari, Artur Lichtenberg, Udo Boeken
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-11-01
Series:Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1075
_version_ 1797404107549442048
author Moritz Benjamin Immohr
Daniel Oehler
Freya Sophie Jenkins
Nikolas Kalampokas
Vincent Hendrik Hettlich
Dennis Sigetti
Fabian Voß
Hannan Dalyanoglu
Hug Aubin
Payam Akhyari
Artur Lichtenberg
Udo Boeken
author_facet Moritz Benjamin Immohr
Daniel Oehler
Freya Sophie Jenkins
Nikolas Kalampokas
Vincent Hendrik Hettlich
Dennis Sigetti
Fabian Voß
Hannan Dalyanoglu
Hug Aubin
Payam Akhyari
Artur Lichtenberg
Udo Boeken
author_sort Moritz Benjamin Immohr
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after heart transplantation (HTx) can cause cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Consequently, monitoring and prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus deoxyribonucleic acid (CMV‐DNAemia) within the first weeks after HTx is recommended. Methods All patients who underwent HTx between September 2010 and 2021 surviving the first 90 days (n = 196) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided on the prevalence of CMV‐DNAemia during the first postoperative year after the end of the prophylaxis. A total of n = 35 (20.1%) developed CMV‐DNAemia (CMV group) and were compared to patients without CMV‐DNAemia (controls, n = 139). The remaining patients (n = 22) were excluded due to incomplete data. Results Positive donors and negative recipients (D+/R−) and negative donors and positive recipients (D−/R+) serology was significantly increased and D−/R− decreased in the CMV group (p < .01). Furthermore, the mean age was 57.7 ± 8.7 years but only 53.6 ± 10.0 years for controls (p = .03). Additionally, the intensive care unit (p = .02) and total hospital stay (p = .03) after HTx were approximately 50% longer. Interestingly, the incidence of CMV‐DNAemia during prophylaxis was only numerically increased in the CMV group (5.7%, respectively, 0.7%, p = .10), the same effect was also observed for postoperative infections. Multivariate analyses confirmed that D+/R− and D−/R+ CMV immunoglobulin G match were independent risk factors for postprophylaxis CMV‐DNAemia. Conclusion Our data should raise awareness of CMV‐DNAemia after the termination of regular prophylaxis, as this affects one in five HTx patients. Especially old recipients as well as D+/R− and D−/R+ serology share an elevated risk of late CMV‐DNAemia. For these patients, prolongation, or repetition of CMV prophylaxis, including antiviral drugs and CMV immunoglobulins, may be considered.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:50:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4fe287d4b70a484fa16ef2819a6d1472
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-4527
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:50:11Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
spelling doaj.art-4fe287d4b70a484fa16ef2819a6d14722023-12-05T11:18:03ZengWileyImmunity, Inflammation and Disease2050-45272023-11-011111n/an/a10.1002/iid3.1075Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantationMoritz Benjamin Immohr0Daniel Oehler1Freya Sophie Jenkins2Nikolas Kalampokas3Vincent Hendrik Hettlich4Dennis Sigetti5Fabian Voß6Hannan Dalyanoglu7Hug Aubin8Payam Akhyari9Artur Lichtenberg10Udo Boeken11Department of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Angiology  Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Angiology  Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyAbstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after heart transplantation (HTx) can cause cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Consequently, monitoring and prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus deoxyribonucleic acid (CMV‐DNAemia) within the first weeks after HTx is recommended. Methods All patients who underwent HTx between September 2010 and 2021 surviving the first 90 days (n = 196) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided on the prevalence of CMV‐DNAemia during the first postoperative year after the end of the prophylaxis. A total of n = 35 (20.1%) developed CMV‐DNAemia (CMV group) and were compared to patients without CMV‐DNAemia (controls, n = 139). The remaining patients (n = 22) were excluded due to incomplete data. Results Positive donors and negative recipients (D+/R−) and negative donors and positive recipients (D−/R+) serology was significantly increased and D−/R− decreased in the CMV group (p < .01). Furthermore, the mean age was 57.7 ± 8.7 years but only 53.6 ± 10.0 years for controls (p = .03). Additionally, the intensive care unit (p = .02) and total hospital stay (p = .03) after HTx were approximately 50% longer. Interestingly, the incidence of CMV‐DNAemia during prophylaxis was only numerically increased in the CMV group (5.7%, respectively, 0.7%, p = .10), the same effect was also observed for postoperative infections. Multivariate analyses confirmed that D+/R− and D−/R+ CMV immunoglobulin G match were independent risk factors for postprophylaxis CMV‐DNAemia. Conclusion Our data should raise awareness of CMV‐DNAemia after the termination of regular prophylaxis, as this affects one in five HTx patients. Especially old recipients as well as D+/R− and D−/R+ serology share an elevated risk of late CMV‐DNAemia. For these patients, prolongation, or repetition of CMV prophylaxis, including antiviral drugs and CMV immunoglobulins, may be considered.https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1075cardiac allograft vasculopathycytomegalovirusheart transplantationprophylaxis
spellingShingle Moritz Benjamin Immohr
Daniel Oehler
Freya Sophie Jenkins
Nikolas Kalampokas
Vincent Hendrik Hettlich
Dennis Sigetti
Fabian Voß
Hannan Dalyanoglu
Hug Aubin
Payam Akhyari
Artur Lichtenberg
Udo Boeken
Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
cardiac allograft vasculopathy
cytomegalovirus
heart transplantation
prophylaxis
title Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation
title_full Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation
title_fullStr Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation
title_short Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation
title_sort evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus dnaemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation
topic cardiac allograft vasculopathy
cytomegalovirus
heart transplantation
prophylaxis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1075
work_keys_str_mv AT moritzbenjaminimmohr evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT danieloehler evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT freyasophiejenkins evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT nikolaskalampokas evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT vincenthendrikhettlich evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT dennissigetti evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT fabianvoß evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT hannandalyanoglu evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT hugaubin evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT payamakhyari evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT arturlichtenberg evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation
AT udoboeken evaluationofriskfactorsforcytomegalovirusdnaemiaafterendofregularprophylaxisafterhearttransplantation